Do Medications Actually Help in Patients with Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome?: A Qualitative Study, Uppal et al., 2026

InitialConditions

Senior Member (Voting Rights)

Abstract​

Background​

Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is a chronic autonomic disorder associated with debilitating symptoms. No medications have been approved for treatment, and patients commonly use off-label medications to treat symptoms. The hemodynamic implications of certain medication use have been examined, but patient experiences with taking off-label medications are underreported.

Methods​

A qualitative descriptive study was conducted with 13 patients (all women; aged 38 ± 13 years) diagnosed with POTS who had taken off-label medications for their symptoms. Semistructured video interviews were conducted to explore how they experienced and perceived their medication use. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using conventional content analysis.

Results​

Most patients described medications as being beneficial and life-altering, re-enabling basic activities, work, exercise, and social engagement. All patients intended to continue therapy. Side effects were common but generally manageable. Propranolol frequently was associated with fatigue and hypotension. Ivabradine often caused transient early headaches and visual symptoms that subsided. Dosing frequency was largely acceptable. Major barriers included the following: medication cost, especially for ivabradine when patients were not insured; limited clinician awareness of POTS; diagnostic delays; and uncertainty about long-term safety.

Conclusions​

Medications provide meaningful functional improvement for many patients, but treatment burden, financial barriers, and information gaps persist. Care should prioritize individualized, patient-centred prescribing, and shared decision-making. Additional research should compare common medications to increase exposure and evaluate long-term outcomes and access.

LINK
 

Attachments

Looks like this is a graduate student project, presumably for an MSc or PhD. The sample were patients form the POTS clinic who were already taking prescribed meds for their POTS, and the did 20 minute semi structured interviews. Given that they were already taking the meds, they presumably thought the benefits outweighed the side effects, so it seems like a pretty daft conclusion that many patients find the med helpful.

Kind of 'give us a group of patients who find a treatment helpful', and we will find out that 'many' patients find the treatment helpful. Give me 13 blue socks and I will discover that many socks are blue.
 
Looks like this is a graduate student project, presumably for an MSc or PhD. The sample were patients form the POTS clinic who were already taking prescribed meds for their POTS, and the did 20 minute semi structured interviews. Given that they were already taking the meds, they presumably thought the benefits outweighed the side effects, so it seems like a pretty daft conclusion that many patients find the med helpful.

Kind of 'give us a group of patients who find a treatment helpful', and we will find out that 'many' patients find the treatment helpful. Give me 13 blue socks and I will discover that many socks are blue.
Yep, definitely a graduate project. The Raj group is probably one of the leading PoTS groups in the world so maybe we could have expected more....
 
Back
Top Bottom