Sly Saint
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
But this is Crawley........anything is possible (it would seem).I have no idea how the problems could be explained away
But this is Crawley........anything is possible (it would seem).I have no idea how the problems could be explained away
Its a stall tactic, they hope that a small gesture will make the problem go away by placating critics and hopefully we forget about the issue before the end of time.but why would that take time to consider - I have no idea how the problems could be explained away.
An exciting plenary on the “Most Influential Articles That May Change Your Practice” with Lewis First, Editor, Pediatrics; Noni McDonald, Editor, Paediatric &Child Health; Richard Horton, Editor, Lancet; Nick Brown, Global Health Editor, Archives of Diseases of Childhood
Creator
Fulford, Philip
Doherty, Michael
Smith, Jane
Smith, Richard
Godlee, Fiona
Wilmshurst, Peter
Horton, Richard
Farthing, Michael
Creator
Laine, Christine
Horton, Richard
DeAngelis, Catherine D.
Drazen, Jeffrey M.
Frizelle, Frank A.
Godlee, Fiona
Haug, Charlotte
Hébert, Paul C.
Kotzin, Sheldon
Marusic, Ana
Sahni, Peush
Schroeder, Torben V.
Sox, Harold C.
Van Der Weyden, Martin B.
Verheugt, Freek W.A.
Creator
Drazen, Jeffrey M.
Van Der Weyden, Martin B.
Sahni, Peush
Rosenberg, Jacob
Marusic, Ana
Laine, Christine
Kotzin, Sheldon
Horton, Richard
Hébert, Paul C.
Haug, Charlotte
Godlee, Fiona
Frizelle, Frank A.
de Leeuw, Peter W.
Deangelis, Catherine D.
Creator
Godlee, Fiona
Horton, Richard
Smith, Richard
History and context of the COPE guidelines
COPE's first guidelines were developed by Philip Fulford, Michael Doherty, Jane Smith, Richard Smith, Fiona Godlee, Peter Wilmshurst, Richard Horton and Michael Farthing, after discussion at the COPE meeting in April 1999. These were published as Guidelines on Good Publication Practice (Download PDF 112 kb) in the Annual Report of 1999 (Download PDF, 4.4 Mb).
Drazen JM, Van der Weyden MB, Sahni P, Rosenberg J, Marusic A, Laine C, Kotzin S, Horton R, Hébert PC, Haug C, Godlee F, Frizelle FA, de Leeuw PW, DeAngelis CD.
Fiona Godlee, editor in chief, The BMJ
...In 1995, while in the US on a Harkness fellowship, I was shortlisted for the Lancet editorship. The selection process took months and in the end it came down to two of us, me and Richard Horton who was then an assistant editor on the Lancet as I was on The BMJ. Richard was offered the job and I thought my life was over. But one kind mentor told me I would live to be grateful, and she was right. It’s possible that had I got the Lancet job at that early stage in my editing career, both I and the journal would have suffered from my inexperience.
Well thank goodness the job landed in the safe hands of Richard Horton then, otherwise who knows how the Lancet might have disgraced itself.It’s possible that had I got the Lancet job at that early stage in my editing career, both I and the journal would have suffered from my inexperience.
Got a link that he is treating Alzheimers with CBT?the CBT for over 65s project Sharpe is doing to keep them out of hospital might as well be called CBT for Alzheimers its only a couple of steps from that to LP isnt it. And thats how it all happens - incrementally - CBT ifying of everything is opening the door to potential LP ifying of everything
https://oxfordpsychologicalmedicine.org/research/thehomestudy/Got a link that he is treating Alzheimers with CBT?
If he is claiming its a cure i would call attention to it, divide and conquer.
Sounds somewhat ok on the surface. But whats beneath and the actual goings on are far more important.
sorry thought I had posted link to the thread its being discussed on https://www.s4me.info/threads/the-home-study-michael-sharpe-s-cbt-for-the-elderly.2499/#post-45733Sounds somewhat ok on the surface. But whats beneath and the actual goings on are far more important.
Perhaps someone should point out very publicly that he has a history of doctoring results so he can't be trusted to be honest
Maybe the funders of the study should be made aware of this and if he lies again it may cost more money then it saves...?
A thought experiment, would they publish a paper that says you can treat Cancer or Alzheimers with LP?
Why or why not?
I noticed but we can use that against them and for science, lies increase costsAt this point I'm not sure of the answer. UK medicine is entering a bizarre reversal into pseudoscience for the sake of cutting costs everywhere.