Snow Leopard
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Regular vaccine doses are highly likely, but I guess they won't be called "boosters" because they'll be targeted towards whatever the emerging variant is at the time.
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/pre...ong-acting-monoclonal-antibodies-pre-exposure
Announcement of an AZ preexposure treatment for those who don't respond to the vaccine by making antibodies or who are unable to take the vaccine.
"
The Food and Drug Administration on Wednesday authorized the first drug for widespread use in preventing Covid in Americans with weakened immune systems who have not been adequately protected by vaccines.
The antibody treatment, which was developed by AstraZeneca and will be sold under the brand name Evusheld, is engineered to be “long-acting,” meaning the body metabolizes it more slowly so that it can stay active for months. That is expected to offer longer-lasting protection — perhaps for half a year — compared to the monoclonal antibody treatments that are given to high-risk people already sick with Covid." ( New York Times)
What's the feeling on T-cell vaccines? Promising or hype?
https://theconversation.com/covid-why-t-cell-vaccines-could-be-the-key-to-long-term-immunity-174494
It is hype.
How do viral vector vaccines perform on that score?In a way what is being pointed out is that we might do better with old-fashioned types of vaccine that present the entire virus, in live or dead form, to the immune system in such a way that both T and B arms are stimulated to respond both to extracellular and intracellular forms during an infection.
In a way what is being pointed out is that we might do better with old-fashioned types of vaccine that present the entire virus, in live or dead form, to the immune system in such a way that both T and B arms are stimulated to respond both to extracellular and intracellular forms during an infection.
AstraZeneca seems to be doing a better job at sustained T-cell response than the mRNA versions, if I remember correctly.
In rare cases, coronavirus vaccines may cause Long Covid–like symptoms
I'm getting my booster next week but this time I'm getting the Pfizer in the hope that I don't have a long-term adverse reaction like I did with the Moderna vaccines. I'm hoping that having had the two Moderna vaccines will make the Pfizer booster more effective.A new study has found that people who received the Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccine are less likely to experience breakthrough infections compared to those who received the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA shot.
The study, led by researchers out of Cleveland's Case Western Reserve University, also found that people who received the Moderna jab were less likely to be hospitalized following a breakthrough infection than Pfizer vaccine recipients.
https://beta.ctvnews.ca/national/coronavirus/2022/1/21/1_5749160.html
As health-care workers become more exhausted, demoralized, and furious, they might also unconsciously put less effort into treating unvaccinated patients. After all, implicit biases mean that many groups of people already receive poorer care despite the ethical principles that medicine is meant to uphold.
Complex illnesses that disproportionately affect women, such as myalgic encephalomyelitis, dysautonomia, and now long COVID, are often dismissed because of stereotypes of women as hysterical and overly emotional.
Black people are undertreated for pain because of persistent racist beliefs that they are less sensitive to it or have thicker skin.
Disabled people often receive worse care because of ingrained beliefs that their lives are less meaningful.
These biases exist—but they should be resisted. “Stigma and discrimination as a prism for allocating health-care services is already embedded in our society,” Goldberg told me. “The last thing we should do is to celebrate it.”
Have you read the article? Maybe the quote gives the wrong impression out of context, I'm very sorry if that's the case.He is making a false comparison. It is not prejudice against the unvaccinated it is anger that they could have avoided being so sick. Comparing that to the way people with ME have been treated and the disabled and people of colour is disgusting.
People are dying because resources are being used on people who are sick unnecessarily. That should be called out and the people who are feeding lies to push their own agenda need sanctioned in some way.
Omicron is pushing hospitals to their limit, but the medical system still has an ethical responsibility to all patients—no matter the choices they make.
Have you read the article I copied the quote from, or any other articles by Ed Yong, maybe listened to one of his interviews?The problem is that covid patients are the priority and are getting all of the beds at the moment and cancer patients are not getting their life saving surgeries. When people make the choice not to have vaccines, with the exception of people who have valid medical reasons that they can't have one, they should not be given priority over other health conditions, which is exactly what is happening at the moment.
Ed Yong in The Atlantic said:A person’s choices are always constrained by their circumstances. Even now, unvaccinated people are not all refusers. Using recent survey data from the U.S. Census Bureau, the health-policy researcher Julia Raifman and the economist Aaron Sojourner have shown that unvaccinated Americans are disproportionately poor—and within the lowest income brackets, people who want or would consider a vaccine outnumber those who would never get one. That they still haven’t gotten the shots might seem inexplicable to people who can just pop into their local CVS. But people who live in poor neighborhoods might not have a local pharmacy, or public transport that would take them to one, or internet access that would allow them to book an appointment. People who earn hourly wages might not have time for a vaccination appointment, or paid sick leave for weathering any side effects.