1. Sign our petition calling on Cochrane to withdraw their review of Exercise Therapy for CFS here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 18th March 2024 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

Caroline Struthers' letter to Cochrane Governing Board

Discussion in 'Psychosomatic news - ME/CFS and Long Covid' started by Peter Trewhitt, Nov 29, 2018.

  1. inox

    inox Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    539
    Location:
    Norway
    She was also one of the founding members of Cochrane, I think? And yes, it would be very good :)
     
    Simone, Hutan, WillowJ and 7 others like this.
  2. ME/CFS Skeptic

    ME/CFS Skeptic Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,494
    Location:
    Belgium
    Indeed. Her bio on PLOS reads:
    This is nice.
     
    Simone, Hutan, JaneL and 11 others like this.
  3. Peter Trewhitt

    Peter Trewhitt Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,637
    Have only read once David Tovey's response to Caroline Struthers' complaint about the Cochrane Exercise Review, so far, and find it very confusing if not contradictory need to read it again when my brain is functioning better.

    My feeling is that he is trying to keep everyone happy and defend everyone's reputation, which is fundamentally impossible. One wonders if some one else has told him he has to take the complaints seriously, but that he has failed to understand the nature of the complaints.

    I had understood from their previous announcement on the 30th of November that Cochrane had decided that the current review was no longer appropriate and would ultimately completely remove or replace it, whereas Tovey now seems to be saying that the current authors may still be allowed to further rewrite it.

    Does Caroline Struthers' blog post containing Tovey's response on behalf of Cochrane warrant a new thread of its own? https://healthycontrolblog.wordpres...iew-of-exercise-for-chronic-fatigue-syndrome/
     
  4. Sean

    Sean Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    7,041
    Location:
    Australia
    This is what the fight will come down to.

    They are claiming the right to completely dismiss the bedrock of the scientific method, which is how to eliminate or control for the subjective element in our perceptions and reasoning.

    That doesn't mean the subjective is unimportant. It means you have to figure out how to differentiate it from, and how it relates to, objective truth.
     
    Last edited: Jan 8, 2019
    Simone, JaneL, WillowJ and 12 others like this.
  5. large donner

    large donner Guest

    Messages:
    1,214
    I think Tovey is just saying, "everyone does that shit now so its normal so nothing to see here".
     
  6. large donner

    large donner Guest

    Messages:
    1,214
    Ye this is whats called just shutting up shop. Cant pass the buck, cant admit any personal liability, play the legal advice route, protect your own interests and if the buck isn't passed onto someone else be ready to team up and blow with the wind with anyone who will protect their own interests and yours.

    If doing the right thing could have any comebacks on yourself be prepared to shit on the weakest and go into denial mode.
     
  7. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,393
    She does seem to have been defending Cochrane a lot recently. I can't claim to have a good understanding of all the heated politics around Cochrane at the moment, but I do wonder if she might want to avoid being as critical of Cochrane's handling of this case as I think people should be. Maybe it's unfair of me to think that would be an issue, but I increasingly get a sense that researchers' judgements on academic disputes can be heavily influenced by personal connections/alliances/etc.

    edit: Having said that, I think that a lot of what I've read from her on the issue seemed reasonable. It just seems impossible for us outsiders to know what's going on. This has engendered a bit of a 'trust no-one' attitude in me.
     
    Last edited: Jan 8, 2019
    feeb, Simone, JaneL and 14 others like this.
  8. ScottTriGuy

    ScottTriGuy Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    692
    Nope, that's about right.
     
  9. chrisb

    chrisb Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,602
    I am beginning to think that the qualification which would be of most use to scientists would be an A level in English literature, or equivalent.

    The role of the "unreliable narrator" seems almost fundamental to all the issues which we consider.
     
    Hutan, Luther Blissett, JemPD and 7 others like this.
  10. Daisymay

    Daisymay Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    682
    To use the argument it is simply a matter of opinion is appalling.

    If Cochrane wants to be taken seriously, they should be standing for the highest levels of scientific methodology.

    How independent were the methodologists and were they perhaps psychiatric/psychological methodologists for whom such methodological sleight of hand is the norm, is acceptable, is the basis of their careers?
     
  11. Sean

    Sean Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    7,041
    Location:
    Australia
    When they say 'opinion' what they really mean is 'hypothesis', and the way to resolve which hypothesis is the best fit is via careful experiment/observation.

    I am actually quite surprised and disappointed that Tovey played this card. It is unprofessional, unscientific, and completely unacceptable.

    Just another example of how deep this methodological and ethical rot has penetrated into the medical science establishment. Wessely and his shitty little cult have a lot to answer for.
     
    Last edited: Jan 13, 2019
  12. Kalliope

    Kalliope Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,237
    Location:
    Norway
  13. Binkie4

    Binkie4 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,308
  14. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    8,385
  15. JohnTheJack

    JohnTheJack Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    4,350
    Simone, Hutan, Barry and 15 others like this.
  16. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    51,870
    Location:
    UK
    Very good blog article, @Lucibee, thank you.
     
  17. Cheshire

    Cheshire Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    4,675
    Thanks @Lucibee
    Great article!
     
  18. large donner

    large donner Guest

    Messages:
    1,214
    I am struggling to understand now why Tovey has gone through this whole process with Larun and rejected her resubmisssions following complaints and critiques.

    From this recent exchange he seems to be rather confused about why he has taken the current actions.

    Anyone?
     
  19. chrisb

    chrisb Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,602
    Two questions arise from the blog. Is the term "fiddling with ones instrument" a standard euphemistic medical term of abuse? And are psychological researchers prone to this?
     
    Invisible Woman and Pyrrhus like this.
  20. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    12,296
    Location:
    Canada
    This sentiment is already widespread. The problem is that ME lives on the medical blacklist and exceptions are carved out to justify not applying those universal standards. This kind of research would never be considered credible in diseases that aren't discriminated. There are good reasons for the double-blinded placebo-controlled standard. Everyone in medicine understands the need for it, way too many mistakes were made in the past. They just don't think it applies here because they see it as a behavioral problem and thus not their problem.

    The problem isn't an understanding of what good practices are, it's to break the disbelief that makes medical professionals think it doesn't apply here. Our situation is comparable to being declared non-citizens and being shut out of legal protections are a result. Fundamental rights and protections do not apply to non-citizens/patients and the normal concerns over ethics and professionalism don't apply because of those exceptions.

    This is what's behind ME being in the common mental disorders group. Tovey's statement that this shouldn't be interpreted to imply that they consider ME to be a mental disorder is totally absurd. Of course they do. That's literally the point and Tovey understands that. From his responses, it's clear that politics and ideology are the only factor at play here and the science is irrelevant to their decision-making process because the outcome has been predetermined.
     
    Simone, Hutan, Barry and 13 others like this.

Share This Page