Blog series: "Orthodoxy on trial: the pathogenesis of a diagnosis" by David Black

It would be worth writing to him with those corrections. I noticed them too. I wonder if he's on Twitter.

Haven't read the articles yet but the comments here sound promising, and I agree it would be worthwhile to get the two points found by @Peter Trewhitt corrected.

Didn't search for an account by the author, but if people would like to share and give feedback on Twitter, here's the journal's tweet of his latest article.



Code:
https://twitter.com/ScottishLegal/status/1504381124918878208?cxt=HHwWgIC92bOq0eApAAAA
 
Haven't read the articles yet but the comments here sound promising, and I agree it would be worthwhile to get the two points found by @Peter Trewhitt corrected.

Didn't search for an account by the author, but if people would like to share and give feedback on Twitter, here's the journal's tweet of his latest article.



Code:
https://twitter.com/ScottishLegal/status/1504381124918878208?cxt=HHwWgIC92bOq0eApAAAA

I could not see any contact for the author on the article itself, and I am not on Twitter so I would welcome the two minor errors being pointed out to the author.

The two articles are very important accounts, especially as they hopefully will reach a wider audience than ME stories usually get to, and it would be a shame if trivial points provides critics with an excuse to devalue them.
 
He is on Twitter but not active https://twitter.com/Black_Scape . I think I tried to contact him either via Twitter or maybe via his work email at scottish legal, but got no response. I may have imagined this...but I do think he should write the screenplay for the Hollywood Blockbuster (or west end play) about this as he is a playwright! https://sceptical.scot/author/david-black/
 


Code:
https://twitter.com/keithgeraghty/status/1506913346595000321?cxt=HHwWgsC4sY3t0OkpAAAA

He is on Twitter but not active https://twitter.com/Black_Scape . I think I tried to contact him either via Twitter or maybe via his work email at scottish legal, but got no response.

Did you point him to this thread and Peter Trewhitt's post?

I could not see any contact for the author on the article itself, and I am not on Twitter so I would welcome the two minor errors being pointed out to the author.

The two articles are very important accounts, especially as they hopefully will reach a wider audience than ME stories usually get to, and it would be a shame if trivial points provides critics with an excuse to devalue them.

@Tom Kindlon
@Keith Geraghty


(Edited to fix wording and links --- sorry, brain-fogged.)
 
Some in medicine objected. A 2008 ‘Wake up call for British psychiatry’ had no fewer than 37 signatories, both academic and clinical. ‘Craddock et al’ (British Journal of Psychiatry) has been described as a manifesto which defended the biomedical approach to research and practice, though curiously a leading proponent of the BPS model was listed. The concern was that an over-emphasis on the psychosocial might induce a “creeping devaluation of medicine [which] disadvantages patients and is very damaging to both the standing and understanding of psychiatry in the minds of the public, fellow professionals, and medical students”.
A particularly notable piece of evidence that the guilty were warned long ago about the harm they might be doing.

a Telegraph headline screamed: “It’s safer to insult the prophet Mohammed than to contradict the armed wing of the ME Brigade.”
Observer science editor Robin McKie’s claim that “Chronic fatigue syndrome researchers faced death threats from militants” who were “as dangerous as animal rights activists”.
The BBC was particularly obliging. Today science editor Tom Feilden claimed a “cabal of activists” insisted that “the real cause of ME/CFS was an as yet undiscovered virus, and anyone who demurred was involved in an elaborate conspiracy”. the SMC nominated him for a 2012 Science Journalist of the Year Award, which he duly won.
Coordinated and nasty smear job across the board. From the start.

If this was the biggest medical scandal of the 21st century it was equally a major media scandal.
Yep. And now the guilty are all up to their necks in that cesspit, as Wessely et al made sure, and none of them can come out of it looking good. BPS psychs, media, government, and insurance industry are locked into a mutual protection racket.
 
The headlines reveal the viciousness of these attacks on the sick: A 2013 Times story by climate change denier Mike Hanlon had Simon Wessely battling “a sustained terror campaign of ME activism” while a “specialised unit at the Metropolitan Police dedicated to monitoring the threat” had been established “but no one at Scotland Yard will speak publicly about this” – probably because no such ‘specialised unit’ existed.

David Black’s forthcoming book The Great Psycho Heist. Is the ‘biggest medical scandal of the 21st century’ about to go viral in the wake of Long Covid? is currently in preparation.

Looking forward to reading this.
 
He is on Twitter but not active https://twitter.com/Black_Scape . I think I tried to contact him either via Twitter or maybe via his work email at scottish legal, but got no response. I may have imagined this...but I do think he should write the screenplay for the Hollywood Blockbuster (or west end play) about this as he is a playwright! https://sceptical.scot/author/david-black/


I'm definitely being obscure - but not sure how much in suggesting that when reading this idea I thought of the film of Roald Dahl's 'The Witches' film. Mainly it is the idea of them mingling in society then their masks/wig come off and the relief involved in that for them. Not because we are all the rest (that would be a rather different person's version). But hey I guess you could use that concept for either 'side' (?). That's sort of been the beauty of having a most people 'don't see behind closed doors' illness.

Anyway could make for a fascinating one given the messing with perceptions type angle, I guess there are so many ways to do this one - but maybe that isn't the hard bit?
 
I remember that movie, and understand exactly what you mean. It's for effect, of course, but yeah, it kinda applies, at least with some poetic license.

Even more applicable, we are basically like the kids turned into mice that even the hotel guests try to stomp, unaware of our true nature, but simply because the witches changed the perception other people have and they can't see us as people anymore.

Honestly this is a perfect metaphor.
 
I liked the way it was written. Everything was described the way it actually was from our point of view (the truth!)

I am used to writings about ME being respectful, in the Parliamentary "My learned colleague is an idiot" sort of way, or falsely even handed so it is seen as a a difference of opinion.

We are often put on the defensive too so things are written trying to explain why the allegations against us are wrong.

I get the same feeling seeing ME described like any other illness. It makes me realise how little that is done.
 
seems likely legal action with significant consequences both to accused and for release of information can speed progress. when your colleague gets due-process-legally-nailed, it might make you pause before continuing. or rat out.

A particularly notable piece of evidence that the guilty were warned long ago about the harm they might be doing.




Coordinated and nasty smear job across the board. From the start.


Yep. And now the guilty are all up to their necks in that cesspit, as Wessely et al made sure, and none of them can come out of it looking good. BPS psychs, media, government, and insurance industry are locked into a mutual protection racket.
 
Only in the US, but this is one of the only redeeming features of the US health care system: tort. Elsewhere medicine is above the law.
Yes, its one good feature of the US medicolegal system, though not without restrictions. I forget details, I looked into this like a decade ago. Elsewhere the standard for medical cases is high but with good evidence, clear wrongdoing, and not following established procedures, which usually give an out-clause, its possible to see. You see the problem there. Its George Washington all over again. Orthodoxy gives an out-clause for legal action. When they use established procedure its much harder to win in court.

This out-clause comment is based on reading I did on both Australian and UK medicolegal cases some years ago. There may be many countries that are different.
 
Merged thread

Article: Cherchez la shrink : David J Black


article about Wessely.
It seems odd that a psychiatrist once described in a Times interview with Stephanie Marsh as “the most hated doctor in Britain” should suddenly become the most all-powerful doctor in that very same benighted realm – yet that is precisely what has happened. On January 27th Sir Simon Wessely took up a new role as a member of the board of NHS England, a body with responsibilities for guiding government policymaking and overseeing an NHS budget of some £152.6 billion.

For over quarter of a century Sir Simon had been a tireless advocate of something called “the biopsychosocial (BPS) model” of diagnosis and treatment. This held that sufferers from the debilitating illness ME/CFS (Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome) were not so much experiencing an adverse organic response to post-viral or post bacterial infections, or poisonous neurotoxins, as deluding themselves into believing such things by virtue of their “maladaptive beliefs” and “false cognitions”. The disorder, in other words, was psychosomatic, and so the fault lay with the patient, who should be counselled out of his or her feckless hypochondria.

In 1999 the cultural commentator Ziauddin Sardar asked how it had come about that a man who “denies the existence of Gulf war syndrome – and ME (had) a key position in our socio-medical order – who has chosen and vetted him – and by what criteria and procedures? Where is the debate over the shaping of such research?”

https://www.scottishlegal.com/articles/david-j-black-cherchez-la-shrink
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Good to hear a book on the BPS cabal’s hijacking of ME is on the way:

“David J Black’s forthcoming book The Great Psycho Heist: How the Management and Treatment of a Crippling Illness was Hijacked by a Cabal of Psychiatrists in Britain and America, and Why is currently in preparation.”

A trivial matter, but I suspect the point “The bid to downgrade CBT and GET would ultimately succeed, though NICE held out until 2021, when the emergence of Long Covid was beginning to spook the boffins” is unfair, given this downgrading was established in NICE’s evidence review and in the subsequent draft new guidelines (released November 2020) both well before the start of the pandemic.

There was some ‘shilly-shallying’ over the final publication of the new guidelines in 2021, but we have no evidence that NICE were in anyway trying to protect GET/CBT rather than just giving the BPS cabal enough rope to hang themselves with, which is what they did. That is not to say that there were not direct approaches to NICE through the medical Royal Colleges to try to protect GET/CBT as curative treatments and back channel attempts by an unnamed high profile individual to persuade NICE to retrospectively falsify its own evidence review.
 
At a time when the failure of his beliefs is the most exposed, has been revealed to be harmful junk, no less. Impressive example of failing upward, of being recognized for being successful despite having nothing to show for it other than massive suffering and ruin. Like being promoted in the middle of a disaster he created. Well, not so much "like" as exactly this.

It has exposed the lie of meritocracy in medicine. Although to be fair, this lie is pretty much universal, it's almost never the case. Everything is political, and being controversial in politics is often good for one's career.
 
Back
Top