Article - Joe Burns (cricketer) diagnosed with 'fatigue disorder' June 2019

Sly Saint

Sly Saint

Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Joe Burns hopes to be available for cricket "in the near future" after it was revealed he has been battling a form of chronic fatigue syndrome for the past eight months.

Queensland Cricket today revealed the diagnosis of a protracted post-infectious fatigue disorder dating back to a viral infection that first afflicted him in October 2018.
Click to expand...

He has been diagnosed with a complicated and little-understood phenomenon after consulting with specialists. It is described by the US National Library of Medicine as "an all-pervasive complex experience that substantially reduces the ability to function personally or professionally" with a patient's 'functional level' reduced by more than 50 per cent of what it was at pre-illness levels.
Click to expand...

https://www.cricket.com.au/news/joe...nosis-lancashire-ashes-return-home/2019-06-04
 
Ah, so PVFS.

The invention of CFS was probably one of the single most harmful acts of willful medical sabotage in history, one replete with such acts. It's still creating brand new confusion to this day.

And boy would I love some of that 50% reduction from pre-illness levels, aka the mild stage of ME. Those were relatively good days. Perspective changes everything.
 
another similar story in Australia (didn't think it warranted a new thread)
Former midfielder Alec Waterman was midway through his first AFL season when he was struck down with prolonged and crippling fatigue....
Alec was diagnosed with the infectious viral disease glandular fever and post-viral fatigue illness, but says his symptoms were identical to those with chronic fatigue syndrome or myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME).

“While what I experienced was characterised as post-viral fatigue, it was all of the same symptoms,” he explains.
Click to expand...
What the young athlete describes has long been one of the toughest aspects for chronic fatigue sufferers.
Click to expand...
:emoji_face_palm:
It goes on to talk about Ron Davis and the nanoneedle research.
then ends with
For Alec, every step forward is a victory. Now back with his junior club Claremont in the WAFL, the inspirational young footballer says he’s taking it one day at a time.

“Do I stop to think that I might get a chance at AFL again one day? I guess I do,” he says.

“But getting completely well is my first aim and I am concentrating on enjoying each day as it comes.

“If, and when, the time becomes right, I’ll definitely have another crack.”
Click to expand...
so rather mixed messages
https://www.houseofwellness.com.au/health/conditions/chronic-fatigue-syndrome-alec-waterman
 
Glandular Fever (common in youngsters) and PVFS.

My ‘first’ diagnosis was PVFS in 2001. 7 months completely off work (Housebound), then slow improvements, then a graduated return to (only part time) work.

Re-Reading diary from that time, I was surprised to read that I suffered with PEM & many of the typical ME symptoms :thumbsdown:
 
Is there any research which distinguishes PVFS from ME/CFS?

When you search for "Post-Viral Fatigue Syndrome" on Wikipedia you are redirected to the "Chronic Fatigue Syndrome" page, which asserts that Chronic Fatigue Syndrome is the same thing as Myaglic Encephalomyeltits.

Yet, I would assume that PVFS by definition requires a viral infection as an antecedent, whereas (to my knowledge) CFS and ME do not - and in those ME/CFS cases which have apparent triggers, such triggers are not necessarily viral.

I'd be willing to accept that PVFS is a form of ME/CFS with a known viral trigger, but I'm not even sure that's true. What else distinguishes PVFS from ME/CFS? I get the feeling that recovery from PVFS is more common (at least in the first few years), but I don't know if that's just anecdotal - or if it's just a matter of if your ME/CFS improves in the first ~5 years then you might be re-labeled as having PVFS.

I tried looking for a comparison of ME/CFS and PVFS and didn't find anything, at least not at first blush.


FWIW, the doctor who ultimately diagnosed me simply called the condition "post-infectious" because the agent wasn't known - but I'd clearly had a preceding infection. This was before the terms "CFS" or "ME" were in use in the States. I don't know how far back PVFS goes.

I have seen the term PIFS, "Post-Infectious Fatigue Syndrome," used as well - which, at least, doesn't confine the infection to a virus.


Fatigue in adults with post-infectious fatigue syndrome: a qualitative content analysis.
Stormorken E1, Jason LA2, Kirkevold M1.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26617466
 
Last edited:
Didn't the term "post-infectious" chronic fatigue syndrome derive from the Oxford Criteria. It seemed to be particularly unhelpful in that it required laboratory evidence of infection, when a large part of the point of PVFS was that there was clear clinical evidence of infection, but the available tests were negative. The vast majority of those with a PVFS diagnosis would not have been within "post infectious CFS" criteria.
 
chrisb said:
Didn't the term "post-infectious" chronic fatigue syndrome derive from the Oxford Criteria. It seemed to be particularly unhelpful in that it required laboratory evidence of infection, when a large part of the point of PVFS was that there was clear clinical evidence of infection, but the available tests were negative. The vast majority of those with a PVFS diagnosis would not have been within "post infectious CFS" criteria.
Click to expand...

It seems like their motivation for creating PIFS was to keep patients with positive laboratory indications of infection from confounding the result from their supposedly "non-infectious onset" CFS patients.* But that's really not going to work if you don't take into account "probable infectious onset" CFS patients, who simply didn't have lab work done.

How many people race to their doctor to get lab tests done when they come down with the flu? If you have something like a self-reported fever of 102 and/or a sore throat associated with onset, you really should be put in a "probable infectious onset" category, which should also be studied as a separate group to prevent confounding (by their logic).

I was "lucky" in that, even though I didn't get tested when I came down with my initial "severe flu," my immune system was apparently still "turned on" when I was tested three weeks later, just after I got hit with what turned out to be the initial symptoms of ME. Up to that point, though, I thought I had fully recovered from the flu. That's why my condition was labeled "post-infectious."

*In reporting studies it should be clearly stated which of these two syndromes is being studied.
A report--chronic fatigue syndrome: guidelines for research. [i.e. "The Oxford Criteria."]
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
chrisb said:
Didn't the term "post-infectious" chronic fatigue syndrome derive from the Oxford Criteria. It seemed to be particularly unhelpful in that it required laboratory evidence of infection, when a large part of the point of PVFS was that there was clear clinical evidence of infection, but the available tests were negative. The vast majority of those with a PVFS diagnosis would not have been within "post infectious CFS" criteria.
Click to expand...
https://www.s4me.info/threads/oxford-criteria-should-papers-using-it-be-excluded.2218/#post-40204
 
Last edited:
That 1987 Salit paper is interesting

Post-infectious fatigue or post-infectious neuromyasthenia (PIN) is an illness characterized by persisting fatigue and disability after apparent acute infections. In most cases the illness is attributed to a chronic Epstein-Barr virus infection. Symptoms include weakness and fatigue in the absence of physical findings or significant laboratory abnormalities.

It seems to be PVFS in all but name and does not require the lab findings introduced by the Oxford criteria thus neutralising the concept.
 
Growing up in the 60s and then doing microbiology at university in the early 70s it was a given that some infections could leave people debilitated for some time, up to about 2 years in some cases. Flu, in particular, was said to leave people washed out and depressed with the only treatment taking it easy and waiting for it to be over.

I was a member of some bulletin boards (and the MEA) in the 80s pre CFS so I heard about some things but not the way you can get information now. There came a strange time when everything seemed to fall apart which i now know was caused by the CDC and the Incline Village outbreak.

I think it was Mowbray who declared that ME was not caused by a persistent virus - strange because he also used the VP1 test which found actual viral particles - so it should now be called Post Viral Fatigue Syndrome which was the first time I had heard of fatigue as an important part of the illness.

Out of the blue, without any kind of discussion as far as I could see, this became the "official" name for ME. They would not publish Melvin Ramsay's book about ME unless he renamed it PVFS!

Then in what seemed just a few weeks everything became CFS, the name was changed, the definition was changed and it all fell apart. After 17 years of never mentioning fatigue to a doctor every one I came into contact with assumed it was my main symptom and ignored all the things I actually had. The invasion was complete and the war over before we even knew it has started.

There was little science behind any of it; it was all jockeying for research money and advancement. The original ME researchers were no match for these so called scientists who reminded me of the archetypal 80s financial workers.
 
With regard to that paper by Salit on post-infectious fatigue I came across this interesting comment in Byron Hyde's Little Red Book:

Children Fall Ill with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis: Knowing about the Akureyri epidemic and the Cumberland epidemic, it is curious that there should be any debate in the UK or anywhere else that M.E. is also a disease of children. In March 2006 I was in court giving evidence for a M.E. patient and Dr Salit who frequently sees M.E. patients for the insurance industry and who attended against the patient, made the statement that children do not fall ill with M.E. He uses the term CFS since as he stated, no physician of merit uses Myalgic Encephalomyelitis. He obviously does not appear to know the history of this illness.

http://www.investinme.org/Documents...de Little Red Book for www.investinme.org.pdf

The most important part of any definition is, who is paying the bill?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom