Jonathan Edwards
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
My point was that an average healthy person has a SEL way above their actual activity level,
Exactly, so that is why Andy's 30 level for basal metabolic rate seems not too far off!
My point was that an average healthy person has a SEL way above their actual activity level,
If most of the body's energy production goes toward merely sustaining itself, then even a small decrease in ability to produce energy would mean a large drop in ability to function in daily life.
I feel like I'm going round in circles here and not making myself clear. If Andy's 30 level is acceptable, which I grant may be true as you argue, then his drop in SEL to 90 for ME is way off - I think it should be more like 35 even for mild ME, as I tried (unsuccessfully) to explain using calories.Exactly, so that is why Andy's 30 level for basal metabolic rate seems not too far off!
We crossposted on our last 2 posts.So the decrease in ability to produce energy in ME must be huge.
I think I'd better step away from this thread, I'm just getting everyone confused.
because we can push above our SEL temporarily, but crash after, so it's not 'sustainable'.So I guess the question is why are Day 1 CPET results pretty normal?
Must it be huge? What about for those very mildly affected, who are likely to be undiagnosed. I went for years, feeling awful but still holding down a full-time job that included a 90 min round trip commute at one stage - in requiring a 50% (or whatever large percentage is required) drop in functioning this group will be excluded. I worry the fact that forum members will tend to be more severely affected is strongly influencing many comments on this issue.So the decrease in ability to produce energy in ME must be huge.
Because we have an abnormal reaction to overexertion that tends to have a delayed onset?So I guess the question is why are Day 1 CPET results pretty normal?
Must it be huge? What about for those very mildly affected, who are likely to be undiagnosed. I went for years, feeling awful but still holding down a full-time job that included a 90 min round trip commute at one stage - in requiring a 50% (or whatever large percentage is required) drop in functioning this group will be excluded. I worry the fact that forum members will tend to be more severely affected is strongly influencing many comments on this issue.
because we can push above our SEL temporarily, but crash after, so it's not 'sustainable'.
I don't believe that the average healthy person would be able to do those things and not feel any effect at all, as those are things the average healthy person does. My model would argue that they have a higher tolerance for those ill effects that they will feel (tired, maybe sore and stiff), and that the responsive biological mechanism to over-exertion, that in patients results in PEM, will kick in correctly for that person and if they continue to regularly repeat those additional things will result in higher fitness for them i.e. a higher SEL.But would you say you could still do 90% as well as a healthy person who decides to add a daily 3 mile run on top of their busy work schedule, go dancing on Saturday nights and play a football match on Sundays, and feels no ill effects? In other words, did you have the spare capacity a healthy person has to be more active without ill effect?
The trouble for me is that I cannot see a plausible metabolic model that would work like this. It seems as if once fully 'recuperated' ME muscles can generate the same energy as in normal sedentary people. That would suggest a metabolic problem involving some sort of defect in restocking short term energy stores. If so I would expect the effort of just basic activities for PWME to lead to some depletion of stock pretty much all the time.
Yes. I prefer to make a distinction between the (muscle) fatiguability which is short term and PEM which is more like a payback mechanism over a couple of days.Maybe there are two problems. One is a relatively minor energy production issue that produces short term effects in the timeframe of hours and this makes patients think that they have an energy production problem. Another problem is something that occurs in the timeframe of days and produces PEM.
That would suggest a metabolic problem involving some sort of defect in restocking short term energy stores.
Another point is that is it is a local metabolic problem with depletion of energy stores in used tissues then there should be no problem doing other things, as I mentioned on one of these threads earlier. If you deplete energy in right arm muscles there should be no effect on left leg muscles.