Action for ME terminates, by mutual agreement with the University of Bristol, contract to fund Crawley study

Just announced on the AfME Facebook page

 

Well that slip is most certainly telling.
(My bold)

 

Come on, don't fund Crawley. She's incompetent and will just delay real help for these children by publishing poor science.

Plus you're making a laughing stock of yourself by funding someone who thinks the illness can be treated by telling it to stop.

 

Maybe AfME have been bottling out, and saying so behind the scenes, provoking the need to find alternative funding? They would hardly announce it that way of course.

 

Presumably the donor would have to be made publicly known at some point?

 

Absolutely. Don't think I'd trust her with a hamster.

 

it is rather scary crawley having list of severely ill children.

 

Agree, except Crawleys idea of severe is not necessarily what is generally considered severe.

"The £6,000 with which Action for M.E. funded this study was contributed by a private corporate donor with a specific interest in seeing the alleviation of childhood suffering."

maybe the donor found out/realised the funds were actually going to contibute to more suffering(?)

 

It's the 'corporate' word that is ominous to me. It should be possible to find out just 'who' they are surely? Plus their vested interests... which can't be to improve life for children with ME as they'd steer as far clear of EC as it's possible to be...

 

As an animal lover... heaven's no!

 

It's £6000, piddling amounts whatever way.

Very useful for them to be able to channel it into the essentially old AyME which folded due to struggling for funds. Helps to separate afme from Crawley with criticism of their connection.

Anything AFME do outside "support" is pretty irrelevant. They don't change anything or want to or if they do want yo they're spectacularly ineffective

 

I've corrected it, yes I meant that.

 

Surely a good sign that they're placing greater distance between themselves and Crawley?

It's a weird statement, but Action for ME aren't really known for clear and insightful communication.

 

That's how I read it as well. Esther Crawley has become a toxic commodity. AYME folded into AfME without bringing her along, AfME stopped verbally supporting her research, and essentially disavowed SMILE when it was published. Now AfME is even withdrawing promised funding.

It's not like money is falling from the sky, even for psychosomatic quacks, and with the amount of garbage Crawley is willing to churn out, she could probably use the funding for it. How often do researchers really say "Thanks, but I don't want or need more funding"? They don't - if they get more funding they expand the project to include more patients or more testing, etc. That would be especially useful in assessing severe patients who can't leave their homes, assuming the researcher is able to acknowledge that such patients exist

 

Agreed!!! also, would be nice, to keep in mind she is just a puppet for the BPS giants, she can be interchangeable, we need to expose the puppeteer also and follow the trail so she cannot be easily replaced while we have the dog by its tail.

 

It just can't be true.

It's not the first time I think I must be doing something wrong. So many people get so much money by offering crap. I just don't get the real dumb ideas...

That was one of my first thoughts, too.