MinIreland
Established Member (Voting Rights)
I am asking this question because I don't know where to start reading and I don't have the energy to dig through all the threads.
Yesterday, I posted an abstract from a recently published book on fatigue and forum members explained that this was not very scientific, which I totally accept.
I am quite new to all this and I notice that, when research is discussed here, half the time I cannot process all the information. Partly because of my cognitive problems and partly because the discussions are very 'technical' or 'clinical'. In don't have a medical background and I find it very hard to understand when the discussion is about X, Y, Z cells, genes, bone marrow etc.
So, my question is: Who are currently considered to do the highest quality of ME/CFS research? Perhaps that would give me, and others, a good place to start.
Yesterday, I posted an abstract from a recently published book on fatigue and forum members explained that this was not very scientific, which I totally accept.
I am quite new to all this and I notice that, when research is discussed here, half the time I cannot process all the information. Partly because of my cognitive problems and partly because the discussions are very 'technical' or 'clinical'. In don't have a medical background and I find it very hard to understand when the discussion is about X, Y, Z cells, genes, bone marrow etc.
So, my question is: Who are currently considered to do the highest quality of ME/CFS research? Perhaps that would give me, and others, a good place to start.