Oh good. Is that only the main study, with the WASF3 finding in a separate paper?Dr. Whittemore of the NINDS said this on 2/13/23 of the ME/CFS Intramural Study (fwiw): “I just checked and they are finalizing the figures and then it will go for final internal review before being submitted. I’m told they are very close!”
Highlighted to me by someone else -
ME/CFS News reports on Twitter that there will be a presentation by Paul Hwang of the NIH during a symposium on molecular and cellular biology.
From the poster:
“Paul Hwang, NHLBI, National Institutes of Health, USA
ER Stress Induction of WASF3 May Underlie Chronic Fatigue Syndrome”
https://tks.keystonesymposia.org/index.cfm?e=Web.Meeting.Flyer&MeetingID=1961
One interesting thing once a breakthrough happens will be to establish when this could have been figured out given the level of technology and the hypotheses at the time. If only there had been some will. Or maybe a better legislative framework that doesn't allow for this negligence.So, Misfolded proteins and ER Stress @Andy @Trish @Hutan @FMMM1 . Email at a number of MECFS researchers in 2015. Add to this bile acids metabolism and choline metabolism dysregulation. 8 years
View attachment 19161
I think that would depend on the size and frequency of upregulation in the cohort.I don’t know whether assessing upregulation reliably requires as many patients as for a GWAS, i.e. at least 10.000 patients.
I was talking about the likelihood of misfolded proteins in ME with Rich van Konyenburg and Martin L Pall in the early 2000s. It seemed so very likely given the absolute requirement for reduced glutathione in folding.Misfolded proteins and ER Stress
Dr. Whittemore of the NINDS said this on 2/13/23 of the ME/CFS Intramural Study (fwiw): “I just checked and they are finalizing the figures and then it will go for final internal review before being submitted. I’m told they are very close!”
Just sharing this note from Dr. Whittemore today on the Intramural Study (not to be a nuisance). Just FYI @B_V
"I just checked and they plan to submit the paper for review within the next month. There have been many people who needed to review the paper at multiple levels at NIH which is what has taken time. They told me they would let me know when it gets submitted for review. It is hard to know how long that review will take – some journals are taking months to review submitted manuscripts, so we can’t predict how long that process will take.Thanks, and hope you are well. Best wishes, Vicky'
Following up from Dr. Whittemore this morning on the NIH ME/CFS Intramural Study:
"The paper has been submitted and is under review! Vicky"
Is it just possible that the NIH funding given to study cancer fatigue reported recently has something to do with this finding linking problems with gene WASF3 in a cancer patient with ME/CFS symptoms and a group of ME patients?
I just posted about the cancer-related fatigue study which doesn't seem to be about cancer after all: USA: NIH National Institutes of Health news