I wouldn't expect a TRP channel abnormality to produce effects at all similar to potassium channelopathy, if that is what you are referring to. My guess is that they are thinking of sensory sensitivities but it does not seem clear.
They do mean among other things sensory but this would change with the PEM state and they cycle that goes with it. When you are stable the sensory is not too bad but push a person in a PEM state and soon the senses are involved.
I don't understand what you mean here. The bigger the sample the fewer false positives you are likely to get. The number of differences depends on how many things you test for, not the number of people you test, and if you don't test enough false positives will come up.
I would like to think there is an important observation here. But I think to get more funding they need to explain what they have found in a way that a scientist like myself, who gets asked to review grants on ME, can understand. I don't really follow what they think they have found.
I worry when a group say they have found abnormal SNPs in NK cells. Abnormal SNPs will be in every cell so there is no point in looking specifically in NK cells, unless you think you are looking for a mutant tumour line. The normal thing would be just to report the difference in frequency of SNPs, period.
I may be missing something simple and would like to be put right if so.
Sorry you have to come down to my level (which I have to say you are very good at) ... which is quite low. Big samples have fewer false positives but you have to know what you are looking for and I'm not sure they do yet?
All the studies I have seen miss the problem with what happens when the body is put in a deep PEM state, even the CEPT testing only ever goes to 3 days. My observations of PEM is through looking after and seeing other children go through PEM and some adults.
You start of with just a few basic symptoms that stay constant, what they term is a base line but it is a bit more fluid than that due to everything putting you in a PEM state. You then say have a 15 min lesson at home. For the next 2 days you feel OK and although you cannot repeat to the same standard of lesson you are still able to do some light reading. Day 3 and the symptoms get more intense and if you try another 15 min lesson you loose the ability to see and control of your legs. You wait another 3 days and try again fighting the growing symptoms, your sense of smell starts to bother you and you close the curtains and not necessarily for a headache but sensitivity to light. Cognition has deteriorated and holding a conversation to any degree has gone. It this progression most miss.
Now if you increase the size of the group you would never see the cycle, so wont see what happens to any of the systems of the body. The other problem is the understanding of activity and rest. Now when Mark Van Ness spoke about this and although we knew he was right me and a few other mothers were sceptical about what he was saying about resting and then doing a little more (if my memory serves me right it was a lady climbing stairs and sitting at every level) because if it takes 48 hours for the symptoms to come out the continual impact is missed.
Here is Sonya Marshall-Gradisnik talking about the calcium, NK cells and Bright CD56 and Dim CD16 and their function with regards to Liesing (I also think their Systematic Review would be worth a look).
Now they looked at a longitudinal study of
baseline
snapshot
6 months
12 months
18 & 24 months. The differences are striking between controls and Me and severity but they should be looking at what happens in that PEM state and match that up with Mark Van Ness finds in the body. At some point something snaps and if more calcium and ATP is needed for the the NK cells to harpoon it would be good to find out what impact it has 48 hour 3,4,5 and possibly 6 days after. It may not be possible to test that often?
The other thing is does this then mean this is why we find so many infections after a PEM state has been initiated or is that my strange way of thinking?