They need to think of that motion as binding and if they want to save the reputation of the charity then allow it to happen but take this months grace period to get themselves ahead and ready for it ie say it’s happening and there are plans to have new people in place and be updating the role to not be discriminatory by hours etcThough I am not optimistic, let’s hope the Trustees do not use promised future action as a way of ignoring current concerns.
in order to save us being at risk of it being rushed and opportunists ending up taking on those trusted positions because it has to be done in a rush later in the coming 18months rather than planned starting now
of course within that month then we do need something tgat is binding coming in - there’s no more trust I’m afraid and only something that signs over that fait a compli otherwise any little things that take time will result in rightly people having to sssyme it might be game plsying without something cemented that all are on that same page and agreed endpoint
was it on here or elsewhere where someone talked about their experience of having had the ‘help team in’ from somewhere like the CC to sort their governance issues and it having been actually a really good experience?
Last edited: