Jonathan Edwards
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
includes this leaflet (see attached file) which could be printed at home (obviously if you have a printer).
Thanks Andy, I have printed a few.
includes this leaflet (see attached file) which could be printed at home (obviously if you have a printer).
[EDIT - oops just read your post and realised you mean getting Doctors/GPs to encourage participation in DecodeME - perhaps via Doctors for ME, social media --- I've left the rest of the post in case it is of some use]I was thinking more directly, given that many PwME won't be able to go to a GP surgery and, even if they did, could easily overlook a poster in the waiting room. I was thinking more along the lines of directly talking to their ME patients.
Jonathan pointed out responses, to the great NICE guideline debacle, i.e. from junior Doctors, who were entirely dismissive of the medical establishment's view, and that the establishment's view was based on a few individuals with vested interests.Given the position of most GPs on the subject of ME, their implicit acceptance of a BPS position, why would they encourage what they believe are false illness beliefs by having such information available in their surgeries? Or by telling patients of their surgery that biological research, into what they believe is a psychiatric/behavioral issue, is going on? Let alone encourage them to participate.
[EDIT - oops just read your post and realised you mean getting Doctors/GPs to encourage participation in DecodeME - perhaps via Doctors for ME, social media --- I've left the rest of the post in case it is of some use]
Yes directly asking e.g. those you are in contact with via social media would get a much higher % uptake than relatively remote contact --- poster in a GPs/Doctors surgery.
Not sure --- if you've a good relationship with your GP then yes seems a reasonable idea. Seems to be one folks would have to decide for themselves i.e. based on their own relationship with their Doctor but yes --- anything that generates more people for the study and they'd be "vetted" - Doctor considers they have ME/CFS.Not really this either!I mean, if you're a doctor, asking your ME patients face to face or down the phone in a consultation.
I seem to have totally failed to express my idea!Not sure --- if you've a good relationship with your GP then yes seems a reasonable idea. Seems to be one folks would have to decide for themselves i.e. based on their own relationship with their Doctor but yes --- anything that generates more people for the study and they'd be "vetted" - Doctor considers they have ME/CFS.
What I'm wondering is whether that kind of strategy is feasible or has ever been used.
I seem to have totally failed to express my idea!
What I mean is, that DecodeME could ask doctors to directly approach those particular patients who have ME and tell them about DecodeME and suggest that they might want to take part.
What I'm wondering is whether that kind of strategy is feasible or has ever been used.
That's looking really good.Brief TV segment on the Scottish MillionsMissing protest which includes coverage of DecodeME.
Fantastic, thank you so much!Decode ME posters will be on display tomorrow at the Northern Ireland NHS confederation. About 600 NHS delegates attend. Hope4ME has an information table.
Is this the sort of avenue that DecodeME could pursue more generally?Fantastic, thank you so much!
With enough resources and assuming it doesn't raise any ethical issues, yes, of course.Is this the sort of avenue that DecodeME could pursue more generally?
Not that I'm aware of.Is Chris Ponting presenting on DecodeME at any conferences?
No plans to look beyond the UK at the moment I'm afraid.I remember reading earlier that the plan was to try to get samples from people in the UK but if this doesn't work to expand to a larger geographical area. Is this still the plan or is DecodeME now pretty confident that there will be enough UK participants?
Asking as I'd love to send a bit of spit from Canada!