Three months of bed rest induce a residual transcriptomic signature resilient to resistance exercise countermeasures, 2020, Fernandez-Gonzalo et al

Andy

Retired committee member
This study explored the muscle genome‐wide response to long‐term unloading (84‐day bed rest) in 21 men. We hypothesized that a part of the bed rest‐induced gene expression signature would be resilient to a concurrent flywheel resistance exercise (RE) countermeasure.

Using DNA microarray technology analyzing 35 345 gene‐level probe‐sets, we identified 335 annotated probe‐sets that were downregulated, and 315 that were upregulated after bed rest (P < .01). Besides a predictable differential expression of genes and pathways related to mitochondria (downregulation; false‐discovery rates (FDR) <1E‐04), ubiquitin system (upregulation; FDR = 3E‐02), and skeletal muscle energy metabolism and structure (downregulation; FDR ≤ 3E‐03), 84‐day bed rest also altered circadian rhythm regulation (upregulation; FDR = 3E‐02).

While most of the bed rest‐induced changes were counteracted by RE, 209 transcripts were resilient to the exercise countermeasure. Genes upregulated after bed rest were particularly resistant to training (P < .001 vs downregulated, non‐reversed genes). Specifically, “Translation Factors,” “Proteasome Degradation,” “Cell Cycle,” and “Nucleotide Metabolism” pathways were not normalized by RE.

This study provides an unbiased high‐throughput transcriptomic signature of one of the longest unloading periods in humans to date. Classical disuse‐related changes in structural and metabolic genes/pathways were identified, together with a novel upregulation of circadian rhythm transcripts. In the context of previous bed rest campaigns, the latter seemed to be related to the duration of unloading, suggesting the transcriptomic machinery continues to adapt throughout extended disuse periods.

Despite that the RE training offset most of the bed rest‐induced muscle‐phenotypic and transcriptomic alterations, we contend that the human skeletal muscle also displays a residual transcriptomic signature of unloading that is resistant to an established exercise countermeasure.
Open access, https://faseb.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1096/fj.201902976R

From what I've scanned I thought this study was pretty interesting, especially this part.
An intriguing observation was that 84 days of bed rest induced alterations in several genes and transcription factors involved in circadian rhythm regulation. Muscle activity and nutrient intake are known cues for the circadian rhythm regulation in skeletal muscle.50, 51 Given that diet and time of meals were controlled for in the current study, and the observed differences between bed rest with vs without exercise (see below), our results support the idea of a disuse‐sensitive circadian molecular clock in the skeletal muscle.52-54

These findings add information from in vivo human muscle to past reports describing atypical expression of core clock genes/transcription factors after muscle denervation in mice.55 The Bmal1‐CLOCK complex is the central modulator of the circadian rhythm system. In the current study, the antagonistic factors RORA and NR1D2 were both upregulated after long‐term bed rest, which may be related to a myocellular effort to stabilize the regulatory feedback loop controlling Bmal1 expression, and thus, decrease the impact of the lack of mechanical stimuli on circadian rhythms regulation.

The implications of the unloading‐induced circadian rhythm alterations reported here should not be overlooked, since the cell‐autonomous skeletal muscle clocks have been shown to impact important pathways involved in human skeletal muscle remodeling, and to be essential for proper insulin handling, lipic homeostasis, and myokine secretion
Which to my mind provides circumstantial support to the idea that disrupted sleep patterns in PwME could be as a result of understandable adjustment to the effects of ME, not that disrupted sleep patterns drive ME.

@PhysiosforME , this might be of interest?
 
From what I've scanned I thought this study was pretty interesting, especially this part.
Yes, it is a pretty interesting study, but the result in itself is also not a surprise.

In terms of ME I am not sure that this is of any major importance, it could potentially be one predisposition. And I guess, a rather unimportant one. I don´t think that any muscle problem is core, and many parts of the body could do influences, having altered their gene expression.
 
Most ME patients' activity patterns don't resemble bed-rest. For the many who are bed-bound I guess it's just more shit on the pile, if these results mean anything.

Personally, I started to experience sleep disturbances and all sorts of odd things while I was still weightlifting and sprinting intensely. The whole bps deconditioning story has never held any water since few patients go from functioning to totally bed-bound instantly. Some people get KO'd off the bat but it seems like most people are able to struggle on over some period of months-years before capitulating to the degree needed.
 
I slept like a baby for the first 11 years of ME. It was when I started improving and exercising that I went into complete insomnia phase for almost 2 years. I also started experiencing terrible sleep disturbances/wired/tired when I returned to work for a short duration after a 'recovery phase'.

So for me, too much activity induces insomnia and sleep disturbances.
 
My sleep disturbances started on the day I came down with EBV. I certainly wasn't deconditioned or excessively resting at that point.
Unrefreshing sleep was one of my first symptoms, about 9 months before I discovered pacing and started to cut down my physical activity. My sleep is much improved since reducing my physical activity, as are all my symptoms. I'm nowhere near "deconditioned" anyway, whatever that word is supposed to mean. Never have been. A little out of shape perhaps, but no more than the very many inactive people with a sedentary lifestyle who don't have M.E.
 
....
So for me, too much activity induces insomnia and sleep disturbances.

Absolutely.
If I have a “late” night, I.e. to bed after 10pm
have driven any time after 7pm (that doesn’t happen often!)
dare to read beyond 9.30pm
watch tv beyond 9pm

In other words, my brain has been ‘active’ - well, I can guarantee that I will be unlikely to be able to sleep before 11.30pm and probably have some wakefulness for an hour or so in the night too.
 
Difficulty with sleep, or waking feeling worse than I did when I went to bed was part of the initial noticeable symptoms for me.

I was still active and exercising.

I did become bedbound but it was a long slide with me fighting it every inch of the way - if I knew then what I know now. :(

I guess it's just more shit on the pile, if these results mean anything.

Yeah, that's how I would see it.

I live in hope that the more knowledge we have about sleep, the less they'll shove hopelessly simplistic sleep hygiene routines that aren't always appropriate at patients and then shrugging & patient blaming when they don't work. This study might be a step forward on that path.
 
Back
Top Bottom