That's what I was chasing down, but decided it may not be such a big deal. The score of 18 for SHAI is as they describe, just in clinical range. i.e Just out of the no-health-anxiety region. So they took a sample of people with CFS having at least some health anxiety (which I felt would likely be most people with CFS), and they concluded 42% of those had severe health anxiety.So they eliminated people with no anxiety from their cohort, and then said that people in the cohort had unusual levels of anxiety? Am I missing something?
There isn't enough tripe in the world to fill that bag.Half of those who completed therapy no longer met criteria for CFS on a Fukuda checklist.
It is interesting to compare and contrast the present paper with this one from 1991....
It does appear that in 1991 there were alternative routes down which a biopsychosocial approach to psychiatry might have proceeded.
This is the 'real' BPS that Wessley et al co-opted: the idea that social distress is important in medicine, not that psychiatric interventions should effectively replace biomedical ones.
And no, I'm not anxious about it. I'm mad and angry and want Justice with a huge capital J
...to test the acceptability and effectiveness of an adapted CBT intervention for health anxiety (CBT-HA).
Yes. You have to be logged in to view any kind of attachment or photo.So why is the document only visible for members? Can only members download documents on this site?
Sorry for the confusion.