Stop Exercising for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Symptoms

Good article, but has some issues. It's definitely improved/been edited since I first read it a few days ago.
  • First off, the use of the term "Chronic Fatigue Syndrome" and not ME/CFS.
  • The "What Is Chronic Fatigue Syndrome" section doesn't say what CFS is.
  • States the CDC dropped GET "this summer", which I guess is technically true as it's not yet summer 2018. But people reading might not realize it was summer 2017.
  • Parts are awkwardly phrased with odd word choice, likely written by someone who doesn't have english as their primary language.
  • Diagnostic criteria section rewritten since I read it a few days ago. It's better, but still says "Chronic fatigue syndrome symptoms need to come and go over at least six months and not be explained by another problem; you also need to have four or more symptoms of the condition.", implying Fukuda.
 
Yeah, it's not too bad, although it suggests most recover at the end. I think it should qualify that younger people have a much better chance of recovery than adults.
Yes, I thought about commenting on that, but the article doesn't technically get it wrong.

The 88% recovered by 12 years only refers to patients who already consider themselves recovered, and not ME patients in general. So among young people who consider themselves recovered, 88% did so within 12 years. As has been mentioned in other threads, patients can consider themselves "recovered", when in fact they still are well below healthy functioning. And as @Invisible Woman mentions, there is no followup study (that I'm aware of) on relapse.

A casual reader might conclude that 88% of young CFS patients recover within 12 years. I know I did the first time I heard about the study.
 
Yes, I thought about commenting on that, but the article doesn't technically get it wrong.

The 88% recovered by 12 years only refers to patients who already consider themselves recovered, and not ME patients in general. So among young people who consider themselves recovered, 88% did so within 12 years. As has been mentioned in other threads, patients can consider themselves "recovered", when in fact they still are well below healthy functioning. And as @Invisible Woman mentions, there is no followup study (that I'm aware of) on relapse.

A casual reader might conclude that 88% of young CFS patients recover within 12 years. I know I did the first time I heard about the study.
I don't think the bold bit is correct:

https://iacfsme.org/portals/0/pdf/Fall2011-AbstractsOttawa-112-200.pdf

What is the Natural History of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome in Young People?

Dr Katherine Rowe, Judith Moon. Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne, Australia.

Objectives:

To follow up consecutive patients referred to the CFS clinic at the Royal Children’s Hospital between 1991 and 2009 regarding their level of functioning, self-reported perception of recovery, duration of illness and the usefulness of management strategies.

Methods:

Seven hundred and eighty eight young people age 6-18 years (mean 15 years) (M:F 1:3), were referred from family doctors or consultant pediatricians for diagnosis and management or secondary consultation. Diagnosis required a defined onset over hours or days of persistent or relapsing, debilitating fatigue, which was exacerbated with exercise and did not resolve with bed rest, duration of illness greater than 6 months, and fulfilling the criteria of Holmes et al (1988) and Fukuda et al., (1994). Standardised historical, symptom and psychological data were obtained from 398 and standardised history only, from an additional 390. 398 were followed up prospectively with questionnaires approximately each 2 years, while the second group were contacted by phone during 2010 and 2011, and a questionnaire sent if consent was obtained. The follow up questionnaire recorded functional outcomes, demographics, duration of illness, use of alternative health practitioners and reported usefulness of management strategies.

Results:

Questionnaire follow up data were obtained on at least one occasion for 342 of the 398 (86%). Six occasions between 1996 and 2008 provided 804 returns allowing more accurate timing of reported recovery with multiple data points. 78% of the additional 390 were able to be traced and provided information. The follow up for both groups ranged from 1.7 years to 21 years. The average duration of illness was reported as 5 years with range 1-15 years. By 5 years 60% reported recovery. By 12 years, 88% reported recovery (n=256), although in approximately 1/3 there was an indication that they were conscious of monitoring their workload. Less than 5% were not either studying or working part or full time, often due to other factors than CFS. Many had married (n=38) and those with children (n=15) reported being well. 90% completed or intended to complete post-secondary training. The only alternative practitioners that were deemed helpful were those that provided some relief for muscle pain with massage, or who provided good dietary advice. Restrictive diets and supplements did not reach placebo levels of response. Symptom management and the strategy of balancing social contact, physical activity, educational input and a commitment to regularly attend at least one activity each week as the most useful assistance. Every young person devised a different balance of activities and program depending on severity of illness, stage of education, family circumstances and life interests. Engagement in education was best predictor of functional outcome.

Conclusion:

The outcomes for young people in Australia are generally positive although prolonged. Ongoing support particularly in navigating the education system was highlighted by them as an essential contributor to the quality of their life and their ability to cope.
 
Last edited:
I think this is an interesting study showing how many people have long-term effects even if they don't consider themselves having CFS any more.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3940158/


J Clin Psychol. 2012 Sep;68(9):1028-35. doi: 10.1002/jclp.21880. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
Understanding long-term outcomes of chronic fatigue syndrome.
Brown MM1, Bell DS, Jason LA, Christos C, Bell DE.
Author information

Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
This study sought to examine long-term health, symptom, and disability outcomes among patients with chronic fatiguesyndrome (CFS) by comparing those diagnosed with CFS 25 years ago with healthy controls.

METHOD:
Of the 25 participants diagnosed with CFS 25 years ago, 5 self-reported that they maintained a diagnosis of CFS, while 20 reported no longer having a diagnosis. These two groups were compared with healthy controls on outcomes related to functioning and symptom severity.

RESULTS:
Those who remitted from CFS showed significantly more impairment on 21 out of 23 outcomes compared with controls. On 17 outcomes, those who remitted had nonsignificant differences in impairment compared to those who maintained a CFS diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS:
Findings from this study suggest that over time many individuals will not maintain a CFS diagnosis but will not return to their premorbid level of functioning.



PMID:

22753044

PMCID:

PMC3940158



The sample was comprised of individuals (n = 25) who, approximately 25 years ago, were adolescents diagnosed with a CFS-like illness.
 
The article quote below seems to say that the study was done only on those who report having "recovered". So, it would be 60% "recovered" by 5 years, 88% by 12 years, and should be 100% by 15 years.

Or am I misreading it still? I'm definitely not an expert on this stuff.

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2017.00121/full
Frontiers in Pediatrics said:
In a follow-up study of nearly 700 young people the average duration of illness of those who report having “recovered” was 4–5 years with a range from 1 to 15 years. By 5 years, 60% reported recovery, and by 12 years, 88% reported recovery.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom