Hip
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
I found this study interesting. They demonstrated a safe low concentration of 0.03 ppm chlorine dioxide gas in the air was effective at inactivating floating influenzavirus aerosols, thus preventing airborne transmission, or greatly reducing viral loads in the lungs (I am not too clear on whether the chlorine dioxide prevented viral transmission or just greatly inhibited viral replication in the lungs).
The authors suggested that this safe concentration of chlorine dioxide gas could be added to the air in crowded environments during an influenzavirus pandemic, to prevent the transmission of the virus.
I think this is an interesting idea, and could well work for the coronavirus pandemic. I imagine chlorine dioxide gas-generating machines could be set up in hospital air conditioning systems, to protect the doctors and nurses who are treating coronavirus patients.
The logistics of setting up chlorine dioxide gas-generating machines in other crowded environments such as public transport though would be difficult.
0.03 ppm of chlorine dioxide appears safe, as the recommended maximum exposure limit is 0.1 ppm over a 10-hour work shift.
The authors suggested that this safe concentration of chlorine dioxide gas could be added to the air in crowded environments during an influenzavirus pandemic, to prevent the transmission of the virus.
I think this is an interesting idea, and could well work for the coronavirus pandemic. I imagine chlorine dioxide gas-generating machines could be set up in hospital air conditioning systems, to protect the doctors and nurses who are treating coronavirus patients.
The logistics of setting up chlorine dioxide gas-generating machines in other crowded environments such as public transport though would be difficult.
0.03 ppm of chlorine dioxide appears safe, as the recommended maximum exposure limit is 0.1 ppm over a 10-hour work shift.
Last edited: