Indigophoton
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Neil Harrison, who is now on the CMRC and doing the FND trial mentioned during the PACE debate, comments in the article,How do you feel when you're angry? Tense? Jittery? Exhausted? Is it the same every time? Is it identical to how your best friend, co-worker, or barista feel when they experience anger? In all likelihood the answer is no, that how you experience anger varies between situations, and that how you experience it varies from others.
According to new research from Northeastern, how your body physically changes during anger and other emotions can also widely vary—findings that upend hundreds of years of conventional wisdom.
Psychologists have long operated under the notion that categories of emotion—anger, sadness, fear, disgust, happiness, surprise—each have its own physiological fingerprint. For example, your blood pressure should go up when you're angry or your heart rate should rise when you're scared. That assumption, however, is not true. That's according to new research led by Lisa Feldman Barrett, University Distinguished Professor of Psychology at Northeastern...
"We conclusively show across hundreds of studies that this common-sense belief—that each emotion has its own bodily fingerprint—is just false," Barrett said.
For example, Barrett said bodily responses such as heart rate, respiration, and blood pressure fluctuate significantly across all emotion categories. The new study suggests there is not, in fact, a single physiological fingerprint for each emotion, but rather a population of potential responses.
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-04-scientists-disconfirm-belief-humans-physiological.ampNeil Harrison, Wellcome Clinician Scientist and Reader in Neuropsychiatry at Brighton and Sussex Medical School in the United Kingdom, studies how changes in the body interact with the brain to modulate emotion. He said the question of whether emotional categories have bodily fingerprints has stumped scientists "dating back at least to the time of Darwin."
"This impressive study by Barrett and colleagues represents perhaps the most ambitious attempt yet to address this question," Harrison said. "The findings suggest that rather than adopting a classical approach, there is a more fundamental need to reappraise the whole concept of emotion-specific patterning of automatic nervous system responses."
Impact Statement
Public Significance Statement—This meta-analytic investigation demonstrates that there is no 1-to-1 mapping between an emotion category and a specific autonomic nervous system response pattern. In addition, we observed substantial variability in autonomic nervous system changes during instances of the same emotion category that was not accounted for by experimental moderators (such as the way the emotion was induced). These findings suggest that autonomic nervous system changes during emotion are less like a bodily fingerprint and more like a population of variable, context sensitive instances.
The paper (paywalled), http://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037/bul0000128