1. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 30th January 2023 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

Researcher allegiance in research on psychosocial interventions: meta- research study protocol and pilot study - Yoder et al (2019)

Discussion in 'Research methodology news and research' started by Sly Saint, Sep 3, 2019.

  1. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    8,311
    Location:
    UK
    from Introduction
    interesting, a nice twist perhaps(?) But will anyone use it? Cochrane seem to be going in the opposite direction.

    full paper here
    https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/9/2/e024622.full.pdf
     
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2019
    DokaGirl, Barry, Cheshire and 4 others like this.
  2. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    11,851
    Location:
    London, UK
    Would it go like this?

    Meta-researcher to researcher: 'We are conducting a study to see how biased you are about your treatments. Would you be happy to give consent to be involved?'

    Researcher: 'Oh, sure, ask away.'

    Meta-researcher: 'Are you biased in any way towards your treatments by believing in them?'

    Researcher: 'Oh, no way, I am completely neutral during trials.'

    Meta-researcher: 'Thanks'
     
  3. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    11,851
    Location:
    London, UK
    I tried but could not really work out what was happening.
     
    Caroline Struthers and DokaGirl like this.
  4. Peter Trewhitt

    Peter Trewhitt Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,094
    I would personally posit there are a number of trials where it is very clear that RA, through experimental design relying on subjective outcomes in unblinded trials, deliberate biasing of participants, inappropriate subject selection, outcome switching and non reporting of null results on some measures, is the main determinant of the reported outcomes.
     
  5. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    8,311
    Location:
    UK
    another weird retweet from Michael Sharpe (does he ever read these things he keeps retweeting?)

    5 Reasons It’s So Hard To Think Like A Scientist
    https://digest.bps.org.uk/2017/06/20/5-reasons-its-so-hard-to-think-like-a-scientist/
     
  6. Sean

    Sean Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    5,308
    Location:
    Australia
    Researcher: 'Oh, no way, I always wear my Equipoise Socks™ at work.'

    Or late reporting, or misreporting/misinterpreting.

    He is just trying to be seen as one of the woke warriors for science.

    'See, I can't possibly be trying cover anything up coz I promote criticism of my own profession.'
     
    rvallee, Annamaria, Mithriel and 6 others like this.

Share This Page