Likely followed by a talk on vaccine safety by Andrew Wakefield and a panel on the scientific method sponsored by Goop.com and NaturalNews. The talk is the pros and cons so I guess it's worthwhile debate to involve people smearing, bullying and insulting patients trying to engage with health care systems. Frankly this is extremely insulting. This is an important topic and it would have been hard to find worse ambassadors for it. Or from a different perspective, it explains a lot about why patient engagement remains fluff aspirations with zero interest from medical systems if those are the people discussing its pros and cons. I think this needs responses but my thoughts on this are too angry for now so if anyone else wants to give it a go. I think it warrants making a complaint to the RCP. They seriously have chosen some of the worst possible lecturers on this topic and it reflects very badly with how they view patient engagement: as a joke. I'm not sure if this qualifies as research per se but it's definitely inspired from their psychosocial research so this forum seems the best fit.