Professor Michael Sharpe

There are some very pertinent comments on Demonitor's Facebook post which is very heartening. Virtually all the comments so far (at least those that I think I have understood) were very critical of Sharpe. (Apart from one commentor who kept getting annoyed that people were talking about ME. He asserted that PACE was relevant to only CFS and that Sharpe had personally confirmed that it had nothing to do with ME. It would be interesting to see what Sharpe had actually said on this.)
It is right there. "I apologise and agree that CFS and ME are best kept separate" Prof. dr. Michael Sharpe, 25 April 2018 to the ME Vereniging Nederland.
 
It is right there. "I apologise and agree that CFS and ME are best kept separate" Prof. dr. Michael Sharpe, 25 April 2018 to the ME Vereniging Nederland.

Thank you it is useful to have this clear statement from Sharpe, though I suspect he is happy to suggest one thing to one audience and something else to another.

The BPS researchers in their publications do not present a clear distinction with different case definitions so we can not know whether their subjects had what Sharpe would consider CFS or what he would consider ME or indeed something else completely different. Indeed given their preference for the Oxford criteria most BPS research could include either or possibly neither.

Also does White’s CFS include or differ from idiopathic chronic fatigue without PEM. If he believes there is an important distinction between ME and CFS why does he not make this clear in his publications, especially when most researchers currently regard both as a provisional single entity.
 
Thank you it is useful to have this clear statement from Sharpe, though I suspect he is happy to suggest one thing to one audience and something else to another.

The BPS researchers in their publications do not present a clear distinction with different case definitions so we can not know whether their subjects had what Sharpe would consider CFS or what he would consider ME or indeed something else completely different. Indeed given their preference for the Oxford criteria most BPS research could include either or possibly neither.

Also does White’s CFS include or differ from idiopathic chronic fatigue without PEM. If he believes there is an important distinction between ME and CFS why does he not make this clear in his publications, especially when most researchers currently regard both as a provisional single entity.
You cannot get a ME diagnosis here, and I suspect it is the same in a lot of UK.
This simply makes things more concerning.
 
Back
Top Bottom