Dx Revision Watch
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Have also asked:
Post-Acute COVID-19: An Overview and Approach to Classification
Eva M. Amenta, MD1 , Amy Spallone, MD2 , Maria C. Rodriguez-Barradas, MD2,3, Hana M. El Sahly, MD2,4, Robert L. Atmar, MD2 , Prathit A. Kulkarni, MD2,3
1General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston Texas 2 Infectious Diseases Section, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
3Medical Care Line, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas 4Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
Abstract
As the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has progressed, a large volume of literature has developed delineating the clinical manifestations of acute infection.
Recent reports have also started to describe persistent symptoms extending beyond the period of initial illness or hospitalization.
Anecdotes of different signs and symptoms occurring after acute infection have also arisen in the lay press.
Here we describe the current existing medical literature on the emerging concept of post-acute COVID-19 and suggest an approach to classifying different manifestations of the syndrome.
We also review long-term clinical manifestations observed in patients who recovered from infection due to other epidemic coronaviruses and briefly discuss potential mechanisms driving the phenomenon of post-acute COVID-19.
Post-acute clinical syndromes in other epidemic coronaviruses
Post-acute symptoms have been observed in a variety of infections, such as Epstein-Barr virus, dengue fever, tick-borne encephalitis, influenza, West Nile virus, Chikungunya, Zika virus, and Ross River virus, among others [38]. With regard to epidemic coronaviruses specifically, Tansey et al assessed health outcomes in patients who had recovered from SARS-CoV up to 1 year after discharge and found that more than half of patients were continuing to experience fatigue and sleep disturbances [39]. Another 4-year follow-up study of SARS-CoV patients found that almost 50% still suffered from chronic fatigue, and over one-quarter qualified for a diagnosis of myalgia encephalitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) [40]. In 2015, the National Academy of Medicine published proposed diagnostic criteria for ME/CFS [41]. Summarizing, these criteria state a patient diagnosed with ME/CFS should have the following clinical findings: (1) substantial impairment in the ability to engage in pre-illness activities for more than 6 months, along with profound fatigue not alleviated by rest; (2) post-exertional malaise; and (3) unrefreshing sleep. Additionally, patients meeting criteria for ME/CFS should also have either cognitive impairment or orthostatic intolerance.
@Dolphin - I can't get the link to the article to work. ?
Longer link doesn't work, times out. Probably best to use the landing page in this comment: https://www.s4me.info/threads/post-...fication-2020-amenta-et-al.17469/#post-297279.
At least they're not yet calling it post covid wrong illness belief syndrome
Royal Society Report (23 October 2020)
Long Covid: what is it, and what is needed?
https://royalsociety.org/-/media/policy/projects/set-c/set-c-long-covid.pdf
The diversity of symptoms and their variable and unpredictable course have generated confusion and uncertainty in both the medical profession and the public. Consequently, many patients have had their disabling or alarming symptoms ascribed to anxiety or depression, or simply dismissed. Long Covid bears a strong resemblance to an ill-defined syndrome usually called post-viral fatigue, whose pathogenesis remains obscure and which is thought by some to lack an organic basis.
The pathophysiology of Long Covid, which may differ from that in the acute illness, warrants detailed investigation.