Paving the way: the second generation of e-patients, their experiences, actions and driving forces (one has ME), 2020, Scott Duncan

Dolphin

Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Paving the way – the second generation of e-patients, their experiences, actions and driving forces THESIS FOR LICENTIATE DEGREE (Ph.Lic.) By Therese Scott Duncan

Free full text: https://openarchive.ki.se/xmlui/bit...erese_Scott_Duncan.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y

ABSTRACT

Background:

E-patients are described as patients and informal caregivers who are empowered, equipped, enabled and engaged, and use digital solutions for their self-care and in healthcare contexts.

Self-care can be understood as health related activities and behaviors regarding life styles and environmental aspects.

The self-determination theory can be used to understand aspects of motivation and to provide an understanding for the basic psychological needs of persons, and how their autonomy, competence and relatedness are supported.

Understanding e-patients also includes understanding their use of different consumer health informatics applications.

These are digital solutions where patients and informal caregivers as citizens are the end-users.

In the beginning of this century, e-patients were described as persons using the Internet to find information about their condition or to prepare for clinical encounters, as well as engaging in online communities.

They were called the first generation of e-patients. Today there is a broader use of and an increased access to better digital solutions.

Therefore, the first generation of e-patients has evolved largely in tandem with the evolving environment.

The overall aim for this thesis isto examine the experiences, actions and driving forces of the second generation of e-patients, and their applicability to a broader group of patients with chronic conditions and their informal caregivers.

Methods:

Three studies were performed.

Study I consisted of a qualitative approach conducting semi-structured interviews with 15 e-patients.

Deductive framework analysis was used, with the self-determination theory as an initial framework.

Study II was a mixed method study with seven semi-structured interviews and a survey with 180 included respondents having Parkinson disease and self-tracking experience.

Inductive conventional content analysis was applied for the interviews and statistical analysis for the survey.

In study III the 15 semi-structured interviews from study 1 were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis resulting in 12 key concepts.

These concepts were tested in six focus groups with 33 patients with chronic conditions and their informal caregivers.

An abductive direct content analysis was used for the focus groups.

Results:

The second generation of e-patients generate their own data, are early adopters or innovators of new solutions for themselves as well as for other peers.

They are characterize by relatedness towards others, autonomy concerning themselves, as well as increased competence.

Learning aspects seem to generate from self-generated data, and self-tracking provides persons with Parkinson’s disease with tools to improve their decision making as well as more active communication with healthcare professionals.

To track one’s health and medication can be time consuming, and it is consider important to find the right balance between tracking efforts and expected outcomes.

When comparing activities and behaviors of e-patients to other active patients and informal caregivers, some variations seem to exist between the two groups.

Therefore two different frameworks regarding role specific competencies emerged.

Conclusion:

This thesis shows different levels of being an e-patient.

The e-patient movement is thriving towards generating own data, being early adopters of new solutions, and evolves as innovators, as in contrast to other active patients and informal caregivers.

In tandem with the progressing digital environment the second generation of e-patients has the possibility to influence the future of participatory design within healthcare contexts as well as consumer health informatics applications.

It is therefore important to follow and understand this development.

Keywords: E-patients, self-care, behaviors, digital solutions.
 
the student writing this has totally missed the reason that people with chronic or even acute health problems are using the internet to educate themselves and find a means to improve their symptoms is the gross failure of modern medicine to actually serve its patients needs .
 
All that jargon gives me indigestion.
Here's my version:

Sick people use the internet to learn about their illness, find out about possible treatments, and share experiences and information with other patients.

The next development has been using technology to track their own symtoms and responses to treatments. This helps them with self management of symptoms and treatments, and communicating with health professionals.

The next stage is for patients to use these tools to get involved in influencing the design of better tracking, information sharing and treatments for doctors and patients, and in research.
 
All that jargon gives me indigestion.
Here's my version:

Sick people use the internet to learn about their illness, find out about possible treatments, and share experiences and information with other patients.

The next development has been using technology to track their own symtoms and responses to treatments. This helps them with self management of symptoms and treatments, and communicating with health professionals.

The next stage is for patients to use these tools to get involved in influencing the design of better tracking, information sharing and treatments for doctors and patients, and in research.
yes this but the medical profession does not like well informed patients telling them how they should be treated for their particular problem after all there has been a long standing paternalistic approach in medicine getting rid of this odd to me idea that every patient is to unreliable to relate their experience and symptoms would be a start towards improving patient experience and outcomes .this would of course require some time and effort from both doctor and patient perhaps education at secondary school level so everybody would have a better idea of how to communicate with medical professionals .
 
perhaps education at secondary school level so everybody would have a better idea of how to communicate with medical professionals .

yep ,I agree this right here is one of the big problems. Patients should not need to be educated in how to get the most out of their appointment with a healthcare professional. This is and should be the healthcare professional's job and in a lot of cases it is impossible to do that properly within the allotted 10 mins.

While working & I got involved with a new client I wouldn't always have previous experience with the specific demands of their business. It was up to me to find that out and bridge the gap between my technical expertise and what was needed for their business.

A patient may not have the ability to clearly and succinctly explain the symptoms and problems they're experiencing for a whole number of reasons. Including the fact they're not well and that's why they're at the docs in the first place. :banghead:
 
Back
Top Bottom