1. Sign our petition calling on Cochrane to withdraw their review of Exercise Therapy for CFS here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 18th March 2024 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

Paul Garner on Long Covid and ME/CFS - BMJ articles and other media.

Discussion in 'Long Covid news' started by lycaena, May 5, 2020.

  1. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,267
    Location:
    London, UK
    Sorry, but this seems to me out of context @Esther12. No competent physician is going to go through the series of ill-informed belief states Garner was obviously engaging in right from his early tweets. We are all taught about the reality of post-viral fatigue and have seen enough patients to have a grasp of it. To fall into the beliefs indicates that he must belong to a medical subculture familiar to me since some of my peers joined it in the 1980s that thinks that most problems seen in general practice are based one 'mind-body interactions'. Essentially these are people who could never cope with science proper and slipped into shamanism early on. When academic departments of primary care were set up these people filled them in droves. Greenhalgh is the same. The PACE crowd are the same.

    This is not the frailty of the situation of the man in the street faced with the unknown. It is the incompetence of someone in medicine who does not have the intellectual capacity to do the job.
     
    TiredSam, Helene, Woolie and 43 others like this.
  2. Hoopoe

    Hoopoe Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    5,234
    They might belong to a subculture of medicine that believes in the modern equivalent of shamanism. However a sudden onset of something like ME/CFS is difficult to accept. We see that people often react to it with denial and magical thinking to shrink the problem to something they can endure more easily.

    I think this can be a valid way to deal with a difficult situation. It can also be damaging, especially in the long term (or when it becomes the de-facto public policy).

    When I had a major relapse some years ago and developed terrible new symptoms, I kept telling myself that it would improve and simultaneously knew it was wishful thinking and that I couldn't actually predict what would happen. However this positive thinking allowed me to avoid panicking. I slowly improved and as I did, I was able to accept a more realistic view again, well knowing that I had told myself lies. It's a way to endure a difficult situation while letting the body heal itself (I didn't tell myself that positive thinking would make me recover however).

    The LP is the positive thinking equivalent of the strongest drugs available. That someone reaches for something to strong could indicate there is a serious ongoing problem. I hope Garner will be okay.
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2021
    Woolie, sebaaa, Atle and 17 others like this.
  3. tmrw

    tmrw Established Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    54
    Location:
    Germany
    Also Prof Garner didn't "end up" being a public advocate. He chose to be one by writing three or more ramblings about his state in the blog of a medical journal.

    It is great that he wanted to point out that there are a lot of people with "long covid". But he could have done this as well without throwing around theories. He isn't a victim (in a sense that nobody forced him to write public blog posts). He didn't need to write the last blog. And he certainly didn't need to diss all people with ME who are still sick.

    Edit: clear up my last point
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2021
    TiredSam, Helene, Woolie and 32 others like this.
  4. Midnattsol

    Midnattsol Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,574
    As someone taking a health-care education, I don't understand where we students are supposed to learn to read studies or evaluate evidence. We have maybe 5-10 ECTS in scientific methods in five years of education. Some of my stat courses have been with med students, they don't seem to have any more than us. Mostly it boils down to "check the credentials of who is talking" and then more or less anyone with a degree or important job title fit the job.

    Edit: A bachelor's degree is generally 180 ECTS, while a master's degree is an additional 120 ECTS where I come from :)
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2021
    TiredSam, Dolphin, sebaaa and 14 others like this.
  5. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,267
    Location:
    London, UK
    Not sure what branch of health care you are involved in but this should never be the way to do things.

    The basic principle is that you have to be able to convince yourself that you can see why a study makes sense and is robust. There is nothing more to scientific methodology than common sense. The difficult bit is getting experience in all the ways things can be fiddled or muddled. In medicine that comes at the trainee stage with journal clubs where senior colleagues point out flaws and juniors get the hang of it.
     
    sebaaa, Atle, TrixieStix and 20 others like this.
  6. Midnattsol

    Midnattsol Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,574
    My degrees are in biomedicine and in (soon-to-be clinical) nutrition.

    I don't think everyone have access to a journal club. I've been part of one, in neurobiology, where one of the professors were working on making a course for psychology students sort of like a journal club. From that I gather they didn't already have something in place. There were none for us biomedicine students, and neither for nutrition. Sure, we've had the occational "read this paper and present it", but there's not a lot of critical thinking going on. Can't say I've been imporessed by medical students understanding of science either, but it may differ between countries what education you get. Not to mention how good your seniors are. Had I been at a different university in Norway I might have thought it's ok to mistake a feasability trial for an RCT ;)
     
    TiredSam, Dolphin, sebaaa and 11 others like this.
  7. Sean

    Sean Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    7,041
    Location:
    Australia
    As long as they bring anti-gravity tech, I'm cool. :alien:... :cool:
    True, but most of us don't get to do it in the BMJ.
     
    TiredSam, Dolphin, sebaaa and 10 others like this.
  8. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,267
    Location:
    London, UK
    I realise that this is a real problem. I also think that the journal club structure we had thirty years ago in medicine has been degraded in many places. This is where the training should come but very often it may not. Critical thinking is the only point of the exercise. Presenting for the sake of presenting has become increasingly part of the mantra but it is pointless.

    Sadly, the answer may be, as in everything else in life, that if you want to get something done, you are best to do it yourself. One of the most important messages of education is that nobody has a hotline to truth any more than oneself. The experts are just you, a bit older.
     
    Helene, Dolphin, sebaaa and 20 others like this.
  9. tmrw

    tmrw Established Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    54
    Location:
    Germany
    There seem to be rules in PVF and ME/CFS recovery. Please correct me if I am wrong, when I am struck by sudden remission I want to do everything right:

    Rule 1:
    If you get into remission, you have to right a book, or a big blog post at least. The bigger and more public the better.

    Rule 2:
    You have to attribute the cause of remission to the last thing you did. Thing positiv, surgery, dinner. Animal sacrifices probably got out of fashion because most people aren't farmer any more and killing animals isn't on everyone's daily to do list.

    Rule 3:
    Sick blame the patient Community for still being sick. This one is optional l, but you earn bonus points.

    Have I missed something?
     
    TiredSam, Helene, borko2100 and 29 others like this.
  10. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    51,844
    Location:
    UK
    Currently I think Paul Garner's article is him at the stage of being a mouthpiece for the LP people who got hold of him and filled his head with pernicious nonsense. That nonsense includes:

    Providing a pseudo scientific mind/body explanation of how diseases without biomarkers occur and are maintained by wrong thinking.

    Giving the person the belief that they can control their illness, and that this ability to control it is a virtue.

    The flipside of that - those who don't / can't / won't use the patent mind control methods to defeat their illness are lacking in virtue and need to be castigated and avoided.

    Avoid any suggestion that the body can heal itself without needing magical thinking, or any research that suggests most people with early stage PVFS recover anyway. Stay away from research and critical thinking, just keep repeating the mantras.

    That it is part of the treatment to spread the word to others, either by training to inflict the method on other sufferers as LP coaches, and to make a living out of doing so, or to write articles, produce videos etc. proclaiming your recovery, thus locking you in to continuing to proclaim yourself one of the successfully recovered.

    This stage of making public pronouncements avoids the possiblity of people backtracking once the brainwashing has worn off. They are too locked in to publically declaring the mantras of the process and would lose face and/or income by admitting it's a scam.

    Edit to add: The other aspect of the treatment that needs to be taken into account is that the promoters/trainers start the process by carefully selecting candidates who are:
    1. most likely to be amenable to the method - as in this case asking if they already believe they can learn to control their symptoms themselves,
    2. Showing clear signs of starting to recover from a self limiting illness such as PVFS.
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2021
    TiredSam, Helene, Woolie and 36 others like this.
  11. Leila

    Leila Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,157
    So a public announcement (to the world or in the case of a less prominent figure, friends/family etc.) is part of the recovery process?

    Fake it until you make it?

    I really dont envy those who won't bc then you lose all credibility and support.

    This is a perfect scam.
     
    TiredSam, Helene, sebaaa and 17 others like this.
  12. ukxmrv

    ukxmrv Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    847
    We have no real way of telling if PG has recovered or if he is merely under the influence of the L.P. brainwashing - or both.

    I have a family member who claimed to be cured by a similar method. She never went back to a real job. After taking up a sport for a year or so after her ' recovery ' she abruptly dropped that and spends most of her time at home. Never goes on holiday or exerts herself. Her parents don't think she ever recovered. She still advocates for the method that cured her.

    PG I assume, at his level and profession, can get by on the conditions that suit him? He won't need to stand for hours operating a till or serve customers in a shop or run around an Amazon warehouse. I could tolerate some easy deskbound work on hours that suited me off and on for years.

    Once the euphoric effects of the L.P. wear off he can live a quiet sedentary life. No one will know what allowances he needs to make for his continued illness, if any. If he goes on holiday and crashes then something else will ge to blame.

    If he can't continue at work then I am guessing that a pension awaits him. He won't be knocking at the door of the DWP pegging for a pittance.
     
    TiredSam, Helene, Woolie and 17 others like this.
  13. Mithriel

    Mithriel Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,815
    Again my memory has failed me, but I believe that there was a discussion on an ME forum about whether having another infection can make ME a bit better as well as worse. If the immune system is revved up and people are forced to rest it could happen.

    Also if the idea of being stuck in dauer is correct having an infection that has a strong response could click the switch when it was over, if you see what I mean.

    Many years ago treatment of cancer was divided over whether you should use radiation and chemotherapy to kill off cells or the other method they used at the time of infecting the patient with, I think malaria (?) so the immune system produces a strong response which can activate it against the cancer as well. It may be that the dengue infection got rid of lingering coronavirus.
     
  14. Joan Crawford

    Joan Crawford Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    546
    Location:
    Warton, Carnforth, Lancs, UK
    Hello, I thought about not commenting as I too felt disquieted like others. However, the more I thought about it the more I felt I wanted to get out there what I was thinking and the harm that this article can do from his place of authority and power given who he is. So, I have just posted this on the BMJ blog comments section. It's in moderation so who knows if it'll ever appear. So, FWIW:

    Dear Dr Garner,

    It is excellent news that you have recovered from your debilitating symptoms after Covid-19 infection. This is the usual and most common outcome from post-viral fatigue states which generally resolve between 6 to 24 months duration post infection. From a longitudinal perspective, for example, Dubbo study (Hickie et al., 2006)).

    I was, however, rather taken aback by some of your statements. For a man of science and medicine to state, for example, “I started telling my friends that long covid was a metabolic disease that had damaged my mitochondria.” It would perhaps be illuminating to your medical colleagues, fellow long haulers post-COVID-19 and the BMJ readership where you obtained objective evidence for this disease and abnormalities and by what testing method was used to demonstrate such? This would be potentially of great value in figuring out, along with monitoring the progression and recovery from, such states if you could please share.

    As a Counselling Psychologist who works with patients with long term medical conditions in and outside of the NHS, I was amused to see that you “… started unconsciously monitoring signals from my body.” I wondered how this could be achieved. By its definition, the unconscious is not available for introspection or therefore self-monitoring.

    I would have hoped that given your medical credentials and access to colleagues who would have reassured you that recovery in the medium term was your most likely outcome. I suspect your visit to the CFS/ME specialist did just that – priming you to the idea that recovery was likely. I was cheered to see that you were able to take good advice in your early illness from patients who have not been so fortunate as yourself and who have not had positive outcomes: to rest and pacing yourself initially. I am glad that you were able to receive treatment for your anxiety; however, I am baffled why you felt the need to seek care from an unqualified, non-clinically trained student in Norway? There are plenty of clinically qualified psychologists, with experience of working with post-viral patients, close to home, in the NHS, to support you.

    Reading the description of the therapeutic process you engaged in (details of which are sketchy to say the least) I am struck by your absence of critical analysis of both it and the evidence base for it, or lack of. Surely this is an important aspect of credibility and essential if a professional is to be taken seriously by peers and professionals? Belief in one’s recovery (“I suddenly believed I would recover completely.”) while presenting woo-hoo pop psychology theories with no objective demonstration of cause and effect, are you really suggesting that your scientifically trained colleagues buy into this? The conformation bias and other well-known and studied phenomena I would hope would be a key part of your line of work (Director of the Centre for Evidence Synthesis in Global Health and Co-ordinating Editor of the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group). So, while you had an inclining that all that was ailing you was not purely biomedical you have found your way out of the horrid situation that you were in. You have attributed that to your change in mindset, pushing heroically through your symptoms and “I did this by listening to people that have recovered from CFS/ME.” In the former two scenarios you show extreme bias by not considering the more likely hypothesis that you were naturally recovering anyway (supported by longitudinal evidence in other viral conditions) and having overcome some anxiety and fear avoidance you are able to recover your health. Why dress it up to read like a moral tale and disparage a completely different patient group to boot? And since no one has a reliable, objective test for CFS/ME nor for long-covid it is scientifically incorrect to state or to demonstrate objectively the later. This is at best a tentative hypothesis, a belief of which there are equally valid, alternative explanations. Ironically, the recently updated ME/CFS guidelines by NICE have removed the existing, poor quality evidence base for the approach you took, for ME/CFS, as having low or very low quality. There is evidence that these approaches, as you are advocating, can cause long term harm to people with ME/CFS, which I have borne witness to time after time in my clinic (Kindlon, 2017), with resultant catastrophic physical and psychological consequences. Many people with ME/CFS spend their time seeking “joy, happiness, humour, laughter…” This makes no difference to their condition – but helps them to cope. People with ME/CFS are not so fortunate to be able to overcome their fear of exercise, as they are not fearful of exercise, but exercise intolerant, which is something that can be objectively demonstrated using the two-day cardiopulmonary exercise test or 2-day CPET. That you seem unaware of this consistent finding in patients with ME/CFS is profoundly disquieting.

    As a leader in your field in a well-regarded UK institution and a position of responsibility and authority I hope in time that you can reflect on what you have written in this blog. Perhaps if you can take the time to digest how biased your thinking currently is. Perhaps a step back is needed for you to look at this in a more scientific manner. Your blog is I suggest misleading and potentially harmful to patients with ME/CFS. I put it to you that this blog will cause upset, and unnecessary distress by overreaching and conflating your subjective and biased experiences with another patient group, whilst simultaneously not backing up your case study with objective data. All that is being presented here in your blog is a biased talking shop – one that appears to be disparaging a whole group of patients, which I find shocking and irresponsible for someone in your position.

    I wish you sincerely all the best in your continued recovery and retention of health and vitality.

    Joan Crawford

    Chartered Counselling Psychologist
     
    TiredSam, borko2100, Helene and 80 others like this.
  15. Mithriel

    Mithriel Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,815
    Medicine can only use anecdote as a starting point for further investigation. In the 70s anecdote suggested strongly that plentiful vitamin C in pregnancy prevented spina bifida. The results were so obvious that it was considered unethical to run a proper RCT.

    The controversy carried on for a long time until it was finally done. Then it was discovered that it was not vit C but folic acid and women thinking of becoming pregnant were encouraged to take supplements.
     
    TiredSam, Dolphin, sebaaa and 15 others like this.
  16. Kitty

    Kitty Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    5,032
    Location:
    UK
    Helene, sebaaa, Atle and 34 others like this.
  17. MSEsperanza

    MSEsperanza Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,855
    Location:
    betwixt and between
    sebaaa, MEMarge, alktipping and 8 others like this.
  18. Joan Crawford

    Joan Crawford Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    546
    Location:
    Warton, Carnforth, Lancs, UK
    Opps :)
     
    MEMarge, Missense and Kitty like this.
  19. Snowdrop

    Snowdrop Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,134
    Location:
    Canada
    Well, having read the latest from PG in BMJ I've finally decided my opinion. Not particularly illuminating perhaps but I find the whole saga so far to be Opera.

    And as they say in baseball (referring to opera) It ain't over til the fat lady sings.

    Gazing into my crystal ball I vaguely can make out something shiny. Wait . . . is that a sword & a knighthood I see for PG?

    None of us is going anywhere so I guess we'll stay tuned.

    E: typo
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2021
    sebaaa, MEMarge, alktipping and 5 others like this.
  20. Amw66

    Amw66 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,261
    :emoji_clap::emoji_clap:

    Thank You
     
    sebaaa, MEMarge, alktipping and 13 others like this.

Share This Page