NIH reply to my open letter to Francis Collins [The Kafka Pandemic]

Samuel

Samuel

Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Last edited:
I think whether something counts as lobbying congress depends on the context and is up to interpretation. I think telling congress about ME would only be appropriate if they didn't know about it or it wasn't well known. Given that many members of congress and their staff members are already aware of ME and its rough situation, I think that there wouldn't be much justification in Francis Collins going out of his way to tell congress since it would plausibly be seen as encouraging them to do something (which would be lobbying), or even criticizing them, since they already know about it, and outside the imperative of just providing them with information. I think that he would be quite careful about not overstepping his political bounds.

At the same time I think what Francis Collins can do is limited. The NIH has to choose grant reviewers and review grants according to particular processes (https://public.csr.nih.gov/ReviewerResources/BecomeAReviewer/Pages/How-Scientists-Are-Selected.aspx and https://grants.nih.gov/grants/grants_process.htm). In order to influence whether particular grants get selected he'd have to use his powers in a ridiculous and super inappropriate manner or he'd have to have 100% of everyone else at the NIH on board with funding as many ME grants as possible - both of which are basically impossible.

It might be within his power to do something exceptional, but that would have to have the support of congress or the executive branch.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom