Have now listened to some bits and pieces (not to all of it, there are 18 short videos). Impression is of a mixed bag.
Target audience appears to be families trying to cope with having a youngster with ME.
The presenters are a mother of a young pwME, an adult pwME&LC, and Prof Tate in the double role of expert as well as father of a pwME.
There look to be two main aims.
One, to share personal experiences of dealing with ME in various situations and make viewers feel less alone in their own battles. This part is quite strong albeit unlikely to be particularly uplifting to viewers as a lot of the experiences reported were negative. And that's coming from people who look like white, middle-class folks capable of standing up for themselves and their family members (they may not be, just the impression you get from the videos), I don't know how that makes less privileged viewers feel. But overall I think the videos achieve this first goal.
Two, to provide viewers with some factual information and share some tips gained from lived experience. This part is more shaky. A few of the 'facts' are a bit on the speculative side and some of the tips are overly anecdotal but not properly flagged as such.
Unfortunately Prof Tate mixed up his roles. It's one thing for him to report
as a father on the sometimes less than rational things the family have tried out of desperation and convinced themselves were helpful. That's fine and we've probably all been there. But
as a researcher he needs to be much more clear about what is based on fact and data and what is speculation and anecdote. Many pwME don't have the necessary knowledge to make those distinctions for themselves.
I also fear that him talking up preliminary research findings as if they're solid facts already and his telling of anecdotes about reiki and brain retraining and what have you may make him look less credible in the eyes of the people who fund research, that they'll be even less inclined to closely look at the quality of any actual proposal. As far as I can tell, Prof Tate knows his biochemistry and has an extremely valuable contribution to make to ME research, I'd hate to see him self-sabotage his chances of getting funding. To be fair, when it comes to ME research in NZ, there isn't much left to (self-)sabotage, the door's basically shut anyway.