1. Guest, 'News In Brief' from w/c 3rd Dec can be read here.
    Dismiss Notice

My letter to The Lancet in response to the GETSET publication

Discussion in 'Open Letters and Replies' started by Barry, Dec 14, 2017.

  1. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,294
    Likes Received:
    21,785
    I submitted a letter to The Lancet in response to the GETSET publication back in July. @Tom Kindlon provided invaluable support. I heard today it has been rejected, so I see no reason to not show it here. See attached file. The submission limit was 250 words, and I used them all. The letter is not science based, but focuses on something I feel is important.
     

    Attached Files:

    Lucibee, Mark, Snow Leopard and 25 others like this.
  2. strategist

    strategist Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,023
    Likes Received:
    10,349
    Was a reason for the rejection given?
     
    Inara, MEMarge, Moosie and 4 others like this.
  3. Daisymay

    Daisymay Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    355
    Likes Received:
    3,991
    Excellent letter, excellent point, no wonder it was rejected.
     
    Inara, Allele, Joh and 9 others like this.
  4. Keela Too

    Keela Too Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    643
    Likes Received:
    5,783
    Location:
    Sally Burch - Northern Ireland
    Excellent letter @Barry - but I would argue that it is "science based". Science is about getting to the truth of the matter. It should never be about word-play and misrepresentation of detail. Correcting a misinterpretation is as much about good science as picking apart statistical errors. Well said.
     
  5. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,294
    Likes Received:
    21,785
    Thank you :).
     
  6. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,294
    Likes Received:
    21,785
    Yes, will post later this evening once I'm home. Something along the lines of having considered along with other letters under consideration ...

    The good news is this shows they have finally given the GETSET authors enough time to respond to correspondence (how long did they need?!), and will presumably be publishing some letters (maybe with authors's responses?) some time (soon?).
     
  7. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,294
    Likes Received:
    21,785
    The rejection letter content ...
     
  8. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,652
    Likes Received:
    47,916
    Location:
    UK
    Looks like a standard letter sent to all writers of rejected letters. Bad luck Barry. Thanks for trying.
     
    ladycatlover, Inara, EzzieD and 6 others like this.
  9. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,294
    Likes Received:
    21,785
    Hopefully the effort was not entirely wasted. It was made clear to me that before any letters are published, the authors get to look at them so their comments on the letters can also be published. So I think it fairly likely they will have seen my letter - I hope so.

    I've also been able to "publish" it here unedited :).
     

Share This Page