1. Guest, the 'News In Brief' post for w/c 13th August is now available, click here to read it.
    Dismiss Notice

My letter to The Lancet in response to the GETSET publication

Discussion in 'Open Letters and Replies' started by Barry, Dec 14, 2017.

  1. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,574
    Likes Received:
    16,585
    I submitted a letter to The Lancet in response to the GETSET publication back in July. @Tom Kindlon provided invaluable support. I heard today it has been rejected, so I see no reason to not show it here. See attached file. The submission limit was 250 words, and I used them all. The letter is not science based, but focuses on something I feel is important.
     

    Attached Files:

    Lucibee, Mark, Snow Leopard and 25 others like this.
  2. strategist

    strategist Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    708
    Likes Received:
    7,199
    Was a reason for the rejection given?
     
    Inara, MEMarge, Moosie and 4 others like this.
  3. Daisymay

    Daisymay Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    287
    Likes Received:
    3,186
    Excellent letter, excellent point, no wonder it was rejected.
     
    Inara, Allele, Joh and 9 others like this.
  4. Keela Too

    Keela Too Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    440
    Likes Received:
    4,209
    Location:
    Sally Burch - Northern Ireland
    Excellent letter @Barry - but I would argue that it is "science based". Science is about getting to the truth of the matter. It should never be about word-play and misrepresentation of detail. Correcting a misinterpretation is as much about good science as picking apart statistical errors. Well said.
     
  5. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,574
    Likes Received:
    16,585
    Thank you :).
     
  6. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,574
    Likes Received:
    16,585
    Yes, will post later this evening once I'm home. Something along the lines of having considered along with other letters under consideration ...

    The good news is this shows they have finally given the GETSET authors enough time to respond to correspondence (how long did they need?!), and will presumably be publishing some letters (maybe with authors's responses?) some time (soon?).
     
  7. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,574
    Likes Received:
    16,585
    The rejection letter content ...
     
  8. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    5,304
    Likes Received:
    33,234
    Location:
    UK
    Looks like a standard letter sent to all writers of rejected letters. Bad luck Barry. Thanks for trying.
     
    ladycatlover, Inara, EzzieD and 6 others like this.
  9. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,574
    Likes Received:
    16,585
    Hopefully the effort was not entirely wasted. It was made clear to me that before any letters are published, the authors get to look at them so their comments on the letters can also be published. So I think it fairly likely they will have seen my letter - I hope so.

    I've also been able to "publish" it here unedited :).
     

Share This Page