1. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 7th June 2021 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Contribute to feedback on the CDC Evidence Review, for more details click here
    Dismiss Notice

Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature, Boutron and Ravaud, 2018

Discussion in 'Health News and Research unrelated to ME/CFS' started by Indigophoton, Mar 26, 2018.

  1. Indigophoton

    Indigophoton Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    849
    Likes Received:
    9,777
    Location:
    UK
    There's a neat summary of some of the issues,

    [​IMG]

    I haven't read the paper properly yet, but noticed this comment in particular,
    (emphasis added).

    http://www.pnas.org/content/115/11/2613
     
    Sly Saint, Esther12, Woolie and 9 others like this.
  2. Philipp

    Philipp Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    222
    Likes Received:
    1,588
    It would be interesting to see if the part about "requesting the addition of spin" is more common with psychology-associated research. I vaguely remember something about reviewers not wanting to add comments about how subjective outcome measures in unblinded trials are problematic...
     

Share This Page