Woolie
Senior Member
This discussion is interesting because it touches on how we use diagnostic labels. What we have here are two diagnostic labels: autism/ASD and MECFS. Both labels describe collections of features that often go together and whose cause or causes remain unknown.
When you think about it, it doesn't actually make a lot of sense to make a claim about the relationship between these two, because we don't know the cause of either.
Just for argument, let's call autism/ASD "Symptom collection A" and MECFS "Symptom collection B". Would it make sense to say that "Symptom collection B" is late onset "Symptom collection A"? The answer is no, because we don't know what causes either. All we know is that there are some features shared between the two collections and some (a lot of) features that are different.
When you think about it, it doesn't actually make a lot of sense to make a claim about the relationship between these two, because we don't know the cause of either.
Just for argument, let's call autism/ASD "Symptom collection A" and MECFS "Symptom collection B". Would it make sense to say that "Symptom collection B" is late onset "Symptom collection A"? The answer is no, because we don't know what causes either. All we know is that there are some features shared between the two collections and some (a lot of) features that are different.
Last edited: