Yup, the picture of different people making different decisions, or not making decisions, is building. We’re getting some idea of the “passed from pillar to post”Sounds like a complete shambles. (The hospital not the inquest)
Ironic...they could compel her to attend but they didn’t want to be the cause of someone’s health deterioration
Yes I was racking my brain for that phrase. ThanksYup, the picture of different people making different decisions, or not making decisions, is building. We’re getting some idea of the “passed from pillar to post”
Do any of the articles make note that the same thing is happening right now with at least 2 other women that we know of? Because this is the kind of thing they need to point out in the same articles, and it adds a lot of time pressure to the reporting, which makes for a good story. It's sad that we need a "good story" for editors to be interested, but this is the world we live in, PR over human rights.Checking PressReader (which digitises print publications) it seems there will be considerable coverage in today's printed newspapers. The Guardian:
The Telegraph:
The Daily Mail:
The Daily Express:
That a patient died from a condition that isn't terminal makes it so much worse. I assume whoever said that thinks it makes it better. It makes it 100x worse, it means the death was purely the result of negligence.This one isn’t very clear. Dr Strain was seen as the lead but has no nutrition knowledge
Psych said it isn’t a terminal condition
View attachment 22521
“In the UK the amount of research that is being done into diagnostic tests and treatment for it is woefully inadequate considering this is a disease affecting at least a quarter of a million people who were young, vibrant and fit, healthy adults and are left with this terrible debilitating disease,” he said.
Assistant Coroner Deborah Archer asked Prof Strain about the view of Miss Boothby-O’Neill’s family that there was a “culture of disbelief” among staff at the Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital that ME was a real illness.
“I start every conversation I have that this is a biological illness of unknown etiology that, just because we can’t do a test for it, doesn’t mean it is not real,” he said.
“When I open a conversation like that it is very difficult for people to tell me this doesn’t exist.
“In doing so I am potentially limiting people’s ability to argue with me, particularly around care.
“Outside of Maeve’s case, I have had very frank discussions with people trying to tell me this was a psychological illness or a psychosomatic illness.
I wonder how they've changed their management of it?“Since Maeve’s tragic case we have treated other people with severe ME and we have learnt and changed the way we manage it.
I believe in his evidence he said pwS/VS ME get a side room with black out curtains automatically plus there has been specific S/VS ME training for nursesPA article about today's inquest via the Belfast Telegraph. Includes some details of David Strain's testimony:
https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/...-specialist-beds-for-patients/a901025462.html
Some good quotes here:
This is interesting:
I wonder how they've changed their management of it?