Thanks for the mention
@Amw66
I assume the first question refers to Dr Anthony Hemsley who is giving evidence tomorrow at the hearing when the Coroner will consider whether or not to write a Section 28 Prevention of Future Deaths Report.
Dr Hemsley was appointed as Medical Director to the RDUH Trust in June 2021, over half way through the period covered by the inquest. As such, he would have had little/no direct involvement in Maeve's case. The handling of Maeve's case was addressed during the main inquest hearing by the clinicians who were directly involved in her care.
I haven't seen Dr Hemsley's statements. However, I imagine that, given his position and the timing of his appointment, the relevance of his evidence goes to how the Trust has addressed the issues arising from Maeve's case
since her death rather than adding anything further to what happened between January and October 2021. I assume that this is why the Coroner is hearing from him tomorrow and why he was not called during the earlier proceedings.
The other two questions in that X post are presumably rhetorical so any answer would be purely speculative in the absence of any further information.