Long Covid in the media and social media 2023

Status
Not open for further replies.
Long Covid SOS, one of the Long Covid charities represented at the UK Covid Inquiry, posted on Twitter.

"Today we found out that @BorisJohnson scrawled 'BOLLOCKS’ across a @DHSCgovuk document about #LongCovid He admitted in his witness statement that he didn’t believe #LongCovid ‘truly existed’ We now know that he thought it should be dismissed as "Gulf War Syndrome stuff""
Anybody surprised?

Just more evidence that the BPS club could not have survived and prospered for as long as they have without the highest level of political patronage and protection.

That is the real reason this shitfest is taking so long to fix. Too many people in political and economic power have a massive investment in it being true. It has become far too important to their projects to be allowed to fail.
 
A minimising article on forskning.no saying covid-19 is a cold now and will get easier every time one has it.

Is it dangerous to get covid again and again?

Brings up that "some research" have found increases in blood clots, stroke, diabetes, and other illness and changes in immune system function after covid, but then does not mention how we have seen an increase in death from "other ischemic cardiovascular disease" the last three years also in younger age groups, an increase in diabetes type 1 in children*, an increase in invasive strep infections** and that sick leave has been rising over time.

*Diabetes is difficult, already pre-pandemic there was predictions that diabetes would double by 2050. But the increased incidence of DT1 in children in 2020 was reported as "alarming" previously, but the even higher jump in incidence in 2022 I've not seen mentioned anywhere. There was a dip in 2021 that maybe made some people go "nothing happened anyway, natural that some years have more than others".
** IGAS is also difficult, but the trend in Norway pre-pandemic was downward.
 
Montreal News: Up to 10 per cent of Quebec health-care workers affected with long COVID

Between six and 10 per cent of health-care workers in Quebec have suffered from long COVID since the start of the pandemic, preliminary data released on Thursday revealed at the first Canadian Symposium on long COVID, in Montreal.

A third of them have experienced symptoms deemed "severe," and more than half of them have been experiencing symptoms for more than a year.

Seventy-one per cent of health-care workers affected by long-form COVID said that their state of health now interferes with their ability to work, and 16 per cent said that they are now often unable to work.

The majority of cases of long COVID in health-care workers were detected in employees who had been infected with the virus since the emergence of the Omicron variant, who had been vaccinated, and whose state of health had not required hospitalisation.
 
Sharing from a LC advocate, this billboard in Georgia (unsure of what city). Sharing as it sounds like other advocates are going to attempt to re-create the same or something similar in their respective states too, but will monitor.

Here's the link from Twitter/X that shows the billboard and the steps that the 3 advocates involved took to execute it (which the steps from the outside, look pretty straightforward and simple).

 
Sharing from a LC advocate, this billboard in Georgia (unsure of what city). Sharing as it sounds like other advocates are going to attempt to re-create the same or something similar in their respective states too, but will monitor.

Here's the link from Twitter/X that shows the billboard and the steps that the 3 advocates involved took to execute it (which the steps from the outside, look pretty straightforward and simple).



@Dakota15 - I no longer have a twitter account so I can only see the first post in the thread.

However, I learned that nitter.net is working again, so I used that to look at some other posts in her thread.

Here's the link to the billboard toolkit doc:
Code:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qBVFujh8QisaKAiTc8L8ngJfJJwSZXzH/view



And here are two screenshots (default nitter colors, hope this is legible)

Billboard tweet - 1.png Billboard tweet - 2.png
 
Last edited:
On Swedish radio this morning:

P1 Morgon: Farligt med långtidscovid
https://sverigesradio.se/artikel/farligt-med-langtidscovid
auto-translate said:
Long covid is dangerous

6:55 min

With autumn and later winter, the spread of covid-19 is expected to increase, and although the pandemic may feel far away, there is still a risk of suffering from serious illness or long-term covid.

Listen to Emma Moderato, who has been sick for more than three and a half years and has recently been getting worse rather than better.

Listen to the report by Ci Holmgren.

SR Ekot (nyheter): Fortsatt risk att drabbas av långtidscovid
https://sverigesradio.se/artikel/fortsatt-risk-att-drabbas-av-langtidscovid
auto-translate said:
Continued risk of being affected by long-term COVID

2:11 min

The risk of contracting long-term covid remains, even with the new mutations that dominate now.

More people will be affected if the spread of infection increases this autumn and winter, as it has done in previous years.

"This is worrying, of course, and we will do what we can to ensure that people affected by this receive the best possible care and treatment," says Minister for Social Affairs Jakob Forssmed.

Comment by @MittEremltage:

Risk för en storskalig patientsäkerhetskatastrof
https://mitteremitage.wordpress.com/2023/10/09/risk-for-en-storskalig-patientsakerhetskatastrof/
auto-translate said:
Risk of a large-scale patient safety disaster

Today Swedish radio has a couple of good reports on postcovid (links are at the bottom of the post). However, what emerges is worrying on several counts.

Firstly, Minister of Social Affairs Jakob Forssmed seems to have difficulty understanding that it can be good to know how many people have been affected by the long-term consequences of COVID-19 in order to take care of them in the healthcare system. No authority has been commissioned to investigate the incidence, but at the same time, the National Board of Health and Welfare and SBU have been commissioned to develop guidelines for the healthcare system. Although the number of people with long-term illnesses is expected to increase, the number of specialist clinics is decreasing without anyone knowing how great the need is. It is time for the Swedish government and authorities to recognise the extent of the problem, but without a mandate to map it, they will continue to evade responsibility.

Secondly, the report notes that people continue to suffer from post-covid after acute COVID-19 and that the number of people affected will increase if the spread of infection increases during the autumn and winter. It also states that the risk of contracting the disease increases with each acute infection. The Minister for Social Affairs only states that those who become long-term sick need to receive good care, but does not mention that we need to use the tools available to reduce the risk of falling ill. Other than vaccines, that is.

Doctor and researcher Judith Bruchfelt mentions that, in addition to vaccination, we should try to avoid infection as far as possible. But no one talks about how this should be done. Reducing the risk of infection, for example through improved ventilation, masks and testing to monitor the situation, still seems to be out of the question. The reports state that children and young people are also affected by post-covid, but the fact that they still do not have the opportunity to be vaccinated in Sweden is not mentioned.

Thirdly, it is extremely problematic that Judith Bruchfelt is left completely unchallenged when she says that this is a completely new group of patients. This is not true. People were already suffering from post-infectious diseases, such as Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME), before the pandemic. The reports show that people with milder acute COVID-19 suffer from long-term and very severe symptoms in the aftermath. I know that many of those who have been sick the longest now fulfil the criteria for ME. Some are diagnosed, but I have also understood through contacts with sufferers that others are met with great ignorance about ME and stress-induced symptom exacerbation (PEM) even at the country's specialist clinics for post-covid.

Repeatedly suggesting that this is something never seen before is dishonest and risks putting people with PEM at high risk of deterioration. They are also distancing themselves from all those who suffered long-term illness after infection even before the pandemic, but also those who contracted ME from COVID-19 or other causes during the pandemic. And in this way, they also distance themselves from the knowledge that already exists about post-infectious disease and how certain symptoms should be treated. This actually risks giving free rein to the BPS lobby to promote their theories. I know, for example, that some post-covid clinics are prescribing gradually increased exercise to people with PEM which, according to the research already available on PEM, can be directly harmful and lead to a permanent deterioration of the disease.

Emma Moderato, a post-covid patient and vice-president of the Swedish Covid Association, tells in the report how she has deteriorated in her contact with the healthcare system and gone from being partially able to work to being on full-time sick leave.

"Paradoxically, it was a number of hospital visits that made Emma Moderato worse. There was no room to admit her when she came in with stomach pains, instead she was asked to come back several days in a row. - It's a classic description of post-covid, these setbacks that, for me, it was very exhausting to be in the emergency room for three days without being able to eat and drink properly. My body can't handle that and it makes me worse."

We are unfortunately many ME sufferers who share Emma's experience of being deteriorated by the healthcare system. And if they continue to ignore the knowledge that exists - and treat people with post-covid and PEM like they have done so far with ME sufferers - we are facing a large-scale patient safety disaster where seriously ill people risk getting even worse when they get avoidable damage from the care.

MittEremitage said:
Some are diagnosed, but I have also understood through contacts with sufferers that others are met with great ignorance about ME and stress-induced symptom exacerbation (PEM) even at the country's specialist clinics for post-covid.
I can confirm this. I've come across so many people with long covid on social media (in Swedish Facebook groups, in particular) who fulfill the CCC ME diagnostic critera but have not been given a ME diagnosis (and therefore also not been educated about PEM) because their doctors, mostly GPs but also specialists, believe that "it wouldn't add anything meaningful", that "it's not necessary", etc.
 
CIDRAP Not 'little adults': Experts say long COVID undercounted, misdiagnosed in kids

quotes:

"I think it's largely because we're trying to apply adult framework to pediatric problems, and as a result, a lot of things are missed," David Putrino, PhD, director of rehabilitation innovation for the Mount Sinai Health System in New York, told CIDRAP News.

"I think what we need are detailed longitudinal studies where we really take the time to characterize what long COVID looks like in a pediatric population," he said. "That has not been done. What has been done is 'let's treat them just like little adults,' which is always a pitfall in pediatrics."

...

Ziyad Al-Aly, MD, clinical epidemiologist at Washington University in St. Louis and chief of research at the VA St. Louis Health Care System, told CIDRAP News that many children likely aren't diagnosed as having long COVID because they don't recognize or have the vocabulary to report their symptoms.

"Kids don't come home and say, 'Mom, I have postexertional malaise, I have brain fog,'" he said. "What happens is that they start doing poorly in school, and parents find out weeks and weeks later."

Hannah Davis, cofounder of the Patient-Led Research Collaborative, a group of long-COVID patients who are also researchers, said recognition can be particularly difficult in younger, preverbal children.

"Generally, long COVID research in children has been lacking compared with long COVID research in adults," she said. "A very sad thing to me is that I, and the other folks with long COVID as adults, we had this whole life where we understood what it meant to be healthy and active and not have these symptoms, and children don't necessarily, so you see it manifest in different forms."
 
So only a bit over a month after disability and welfare released numbers showing that long term sick leave has been steadily increasing, in categories related to long covid especially (they do not include mental health in this, but personally I believe there are people who have likely been misdiagnosed as having anxiety or depression), there is a news media article about it:

Rekordmange sjukmelde: – Vi er bekymra
Record number of sick reports: - We are worried

Decent enough article, mentions that risk is present even after not being affected after previous infections. Doesn't claim vaccine is going to solve the issue. But then mentions nothing about mitigations going forward despite stating that models say it's likely half the population is going to become infected this winter :banghead:

Oh and there's been a meeting with the directory of health and the Norwegian "Long covid expertise". The only somewhat official "expertise" I can remember is a group with both Signe Flottorp and Henrik Vogt, so not expertise I have faith in.

Edit: I think it's sad they are not including the increase in death from heart disease even in younger age group, the alarming increase in diabetes, the increase in serious infectious disease like strep A in children and now recently also our largest outbreak ever of E.coli with several children becoming severely ill.
 
Long Covid at the UK Covid Inquiry today

Starts sometime between 10am to 1pm with Prof Chris Brightling and Dr Rachel Evans then after 2pm Ondine Sherwood.

Available on YouTube plus I think on their website

https://covid19.public-inquiry.uk/h...olitical-governance-module-2-public-hearings/

"Looking back on it... do you think the NHS or public health authorities could have done more in those early months to respond to the developing picture?"

"So I think with hindsight the answer to that is absolutely yes, that they were left alone with what is a very frightening condition.... health care professionals weren't there to support them and the research wasn't there, and perhaps more could have been done at the start of before the pandemic to prepare for what those post-viral syndromes might have been"


Talking about it in the past while all of this still holds true. Nothing substantial is being done, denial and psychologization, the cause of this failure, are still raging on, in fact have been amplified further. Everywhere it's the same, this doesn't have to do with any particular healthcare system, they all failed, every last one of them is continuing the same failure.

And still zero acknowledgement that it was in fact warned very early on, warnings that have since been validated further, proven to be highly accurate and actionable. In fact the very things we have been demanding for decades are always, without fail, what ends up being recommended, even if it's not acted on.
 
I listened off and on as I could and felt as if it was largely that ME had never existed. There were references to CFS, Chronic fatigue. The criteria for CFS was said to be the CDC one. PEM was mentioned but with fatigue as the primary mention.

To be fair none of these people were pretending to be ME experts. I think that this day could have benefited from having some one who knew ME history there.

One new term to me was along the line of "hibernating" study. This refers to a study that can be picked up at each new pandemic. I need to listen to the whole thing again and see what I missed or have wrong.

p.s. I noticed that there would be a transcript produced for the Inquiry and posted to their website "soon".
 
Last edited:
:banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead:

Mental Health Is a Universal Right
https://time.com/collection/time100-voices/6323214/mental-health-care-delivery-who-chile/
Multiplying and escalating crises are placing ever greater strains on people’s mental health and the services available to support them. From the lingering effects of COVID-19, the uptick in climate-related emergencies, and the ongoing impacts of conflict and displacement in many regions, more and more people are suffering. Meanwhile, stigma and discrimination against people with mental health conditions and psychosocial disabilities continues in our schools, workplaces, and communities.
It's BS like cowardly putting Long Covid as a mental health issue that makes all the messaging around mental health completely pointless. They can't even tell the difference, don't even have basic understanding of mental health, and medicine does not treat mental health seriously, including by not caring about miscategorizing entire illnesses, in fact by insisting against all evidence that they prefer it this way.

This is written by the director-general of the WHO and the president of Chile.

Basic health care isn't even a right yet. Not even close. Mental health care is barely where medicine was a century ago, it's not realistic to pretend that this is anywhere near realistic. This messaging makes about as much sense as "a mansion for everyone", in the 4th century, when the ability to build mansions barely existed at all.

Yes, it can be said that chronic illness causes psychological suffering. But none of this can be addressed while medicine is stuck with psychosomatic ideology, unable to make any progress to address the cause and mislabeling it as mental health when it isn't that.
 
BMJ: What happens inside a long covid clinic?
https://www.bmj.com/content/382/bmj.p1791
7 September 2023
In response to the above article.

We need better care for long covid and ME/CFS

"As a patient with severe long covid and myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME), I was pleased to see Dean’s article about a long covid clinic.1 I went from working on-call as a consultant to being unable to stand or feed myself with long covid. I remain severely affected a year later and now face losing my job. Altmann and colleagues estimate that one in 10 people "

Paywalled, https://www.bmj.com/content/383/bmj.p2372
 
Long covid: Researchers “extremely angry” at Boris Johnson’s “bollocks” comment

"Clinicians who led research on long covid from early on in the pandemic and who met government members to discuss the condition have expressed sadness and anger after messages emerged in which the then prime minister, Boris Johnson, described the condition as “bollocks.”

During a UK Covid-19 Inquiry session on long covid on 13 October researchers were shown a memo provided to Johnson in October 2020 that discussed a report on long covid and its symptoms.1 On it he had written: “Bollocks. This is Gulf War syndrome stuff.” In February 2021 Johnson wrote in a WhatsApp message, “Do we really believe in long covid? . . . I bet it’s complete Gulf War syndrome stuff.”

Chris Brightling and Rachael Evans, two of the investigators leading the Post-Hospitalisation Covid (Phosp-Covid) study,2 a national study looking at the long term effects of covid-19 on hospital patients, said they were “shocked” and “angry” by the messages and raised concerns over how much Johnson’s views had influenced the government’s decision making."

https://www.bmj.com/content/383/bmj.p2406
 
Dominic Meagher on BlueSky (Deputy Director & Chief Economist, John Curtain Research Centre)

Responding to news that Australian CMO is removing Covid as a communicable disease of national significance.

I don’t get how these heath experts have such a narrow concept of the cost of heath sequelae. I mean, even ATAGI only ever considered death of the primary patient in their assessment of the costs/benefits for vaccines for kids etc. It seems like almost the entire profession is ruled by ideology

(I say that as an economist who recognises a profession distorted by ideology, especially around 2003-2008)

(From the @rvallee school :))
 
Good news though, with regard to the commentary, I don’t think it’s true that governments provide all the necessary money to make speedy progress on all illnesses. Privately raised money is important.

I hope the way that the biomedical LC-researchers have positioned themselves now ensures that we won't have a repeat of the ME Lines-scandal earlier this year.

The consortia/research teams are already there, you only have to send them the funds. Our government is supposed to make 32 million available for research into LC.
 
Good news though, with regard to the commentary, I don’t think it’s true that governments provide all the necessary money to make speedy progress on all illnesses. Privately raised money is important.
We could probably raise 5-10x as much money easily if medicine were to simply acknowledge that it's a serious issue, whether we are talking about LC or ME. Private fund-raising requires legitimacy. All diseases that manage this have significant recognition, have many MDs on board and, especially, no detractors.

It's actually impressive how much has been achieved with medicine mostly working against us. But this is the main blocker.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom