Kate Kelland follows you on Twitter

Estherbot

Estherbot

Senior Member (Voting Rights)
You may be interested to know that Kate Kelland, the journalist behind the Reuters Michael Sharpe story, follows a large number of S4ME members on Twitter.

https://twitter.com/kkelland/following

We know about @Paul Watton & @dave30th. The list also includes as @Spoonseeker & Simon McGrath.

The list probably has been partly compiled by Michael Sharpe himself. I guess they are hoping someone will say something daft or inappropriate.
 
Looking for soundbites (tweets to be more accurate) to use against us?
Perhaps its time to tweet Trial by Error articles?
And perhaps CDC and other scientific webinars?

On the more contemplative side are we really that important to her career to constantly follow?
Or is it to build material for the next article?


Possible angles
Patients can tweet while claiming to be sick?
Patients disagree with "scientist" who publishes trials where people are "cured" before they begin treatment?
Patients won't stop talking about or to particular scientist they disagree with?
UK government is wrong when they condemn unscientific research?

I think my signature is extra correct today, all spirits are enslaved that serve things evil.
 
Last edited:
Estherbot said:
You may be interested to know that Kate Kelland, the journalist behind the Reuters Michael Sharpe story, follows a large number of S4ME members on Twitter.

https://twitter.com/kkelland/following

We know about @Paul Watton & @dave30th. The list also includes as @Spoonseeker & Simon McGrath.

The list probably has been partly compiled by Michael Sharpe himself. I guess they are hoping someone will say something daft or inappropriate.
Click to expand...
So she has no excuse whatsoever to be confused or misinformed about the fact that Sharpe and Wessely's allegations are largely fabrications, or at the very least gross exaggerations.

Wow. That's bad. Not particularly surprising but... damn. Deliberately putting out disinformation knowing it will lead to angry mobs screaming at us and further degradation of already deplorable medical care. That's going to look so ghoulish and corrupt in hindsight. I don't understand how they don't get that it will massively backfire. You can't just maintain such a big lie like this forever.
 
Peter Trewhitt said:
Looking on the bright side. She might actually read what people say and learn something.
Click to expand...
Its highly likely that ship has sailed. There is no shortage of real material from all the sources she has quoted, David Tuller's articles are all factual and thoroughly referenced, the CDC and other sources she names are reputable yet she looks down on them, there is no shortage of material from MEPedia to Youtube that has loads of factual information thats easily cross checked (for MEPedia the references are provided) and the clips available from OMF and a whole host of other sources explain their scientific findings and methodologies and even have Nobel prize winners as employees. The only reason she can claim ignorance is by purposely avoiding information she does not like (confirmation bias, ironically a verifiable psychology concept). Now its highly likely she believes her own words and what was provided to her but if she were truly open minded she would figure out the truth by reading everything from the lack of evidence for the harassment (including them losing the harassment argument in court where they had to provide evidence of it), from analyzing the real science from all the sources beyond those i named. Not to mention Simon Wessely's own goal by attempting to get his lawyer friend Mike Godwin to turn on us and failing spectacularly.

So this is intentional. Now if she wants to leave her bubble that would be great.
Kate, if your reading this and are interested in learning the truth of whats going on please research everything i just mentioned and even join the forum and ask for more references, we can provide them in spades
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom