Barry
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
True. Not being one I missed that possibility.I am sure there are movie buffs who would watch anything for free![]()
True. Not being one I missed that possibility.I am sure there are movie buffs who would watch anything for free![]()
I'm afraid you will need to explain more explicitly what you mean, for me to be sure I understand exactly what you are saying anyway.I suspect that the financial realities of ME necessitate consideration of the opportunity cost of any transaction
For anyone who missed it, Jen has posted a long thread of posts under the initial post on Twitter, including answering some people's questions:
Thats sad to hear, but i assume Youtube has some algorithm to remove copyrighted works, they seem to be able to do it for mainstream customers.
I assume she owns or directs the organization that owns the copyright, i assume she can press charges or get the authorities in the person's jurisdiction involved? Not a nice thing to have to do but if someone insists on screwing over your copyright...
If it was one person breaking copyright to put it up on You Tube, then it is right to blame that person. And blame You Tube for not taking it down quickly.
I am uncomfortable with the implied condemnation of a whole nation on the basis of one person's wrong action. I suspect a lot of people who watched the pirated version in the UK were unaware it was pirated.
My limited sample for this comment is a family member and a couple of friends who told me it was now available free on YouTube, honestly not realising it was pirated. I had a look but didn't watch much of it, and only later heard it was pirated.
I later bought the DVD and watched it.
I am of course sorry to hear it was pirated, and losses incurred, and would support fund raising for more medical education based around the film. But let's do that as a positive act, not laced with a heavy dose of blame on a whole nation.
Agree we need to be positive now.
I do think that a way to do this would be to crowdfund MEAction/MEA led medical education programme. Building on US model and US work - but in U.K. Here working on positive change while others are rightly debunking PACE. Think we need both approaches and the positive education is vital for our futures.
I do think that a way to do this would be to crowdfund MEAction/MEA led medical education programme. Building on US model and US work - but in U.K. Here working on positive change while others are rightly debunking PACE. Think we need both approaches and the positive education is vital for our futures.
I don't follow this. We have a huge amount of educational work done by people like the MEA with the purple book. MEA and Biobank and various other organisations have worked hard to disseminate Unrest and provide discussion panels. I cannot see what a single case of pirating has to do with any strategy on education. If we are going to educate in medical schools we need professional medical input so that the message is based on good science. Otherwise it will not be taken seriously. People are working on that right now in the UK.
Unfortunately public screenings ( such as at med schools) require a license to screen - c £200Thank you @Jonathan Edwards. I agree it's vital that efforts to educate doctors and medical students should be done by medical professionals and researchers who have both sound knowledge and credibility. I'm pleased to hear that is happening. Do you have suggestions or ideas of how we could best support that, for example by fundraising for the MEA or other organisations.
Edit to add - Unrest and pwme can play a part in that too by showing and telling the patient experience.
Unfortunately public screenings ( such as at med schools) require a license to screen - c £200
The DVD is also priced at higher end of market ( probably due to distribution costs?) - not everyone has itunes / netflix.
The Youtube generation expect everything to be " for free"....