1. Sign our petition calling on Cochrane to withdraw their review of Exercise Therapy for CFS here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 18th March 2024 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

Jen Brea: My ME is in remission

Discussion in 'General ME/CFS news' started by Dr Carrot, May 20, 2019.

  1. DokaGirl

    DokaGirl Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,664
     
  2. wastwater

    wastwater Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    347
    I have heard of chiari malformation from my rare gene group,but never paid much attention the person said sometimes people are misdiagnosed as having fibromyalgia

    DMP022 Narrow spinal canal as an unknown characteristic in Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome
    https://www.spine-health.com/video/cervical-spinal-stenosis-video

    Mostly I don’t have those symptoms
     
    Last edited: May 24, 2019
    MSEsperanza, andypants and DokaGirl like this.
  3. Alvin

    Alvin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,309
    I assume its going to come and go for me and this is just a symptom of increasing ME severity
    That said if i figure out exactly what caused it i'll post it


    I'm very different i will seek testing if i can reasonably manage it. One of my greatest fears is that a treatment for ME will be found and it won't work on me and i had something else all along and if it was something that could have treated years earlier those are years i can never get back.
    That said i most certainly would not undergo risky surgery on a whim or on flimsy evidence, but that traction test mentioned is a very good test that seems non invasive and rather conclusive. Of course i would suggest dotting i and crossing ts before subscribing to easy answers.
    That said i doubt i have CCI but i can only prove that with a proper test

    I can imagine

    Very true. In the end we need a culture change, we need to say psychosomatic has to be proven and not default and we need to make sure fraud is weeded out, PACE was doctored to give the results they wanted, even when their own stacked deck during the trial before the doctoring turned on them they would not accept reality.

    Public sentiment is not about reality, its about chosen position. Hence doublethink, alternative facts, lies, scapegoats and so on are employed, to pretend reality is what they want it to be.

    If you mean by the PACErs then of course not, they are only interested in the psychosomatic religion they have created. If you speak of public sentiment we are just not a big kettle of fish in public consciousness. If you speak of the media they have problems of their own from sucking up to bullies to hubris in believing they know right from wrong and are not subject to human foibles.

    They are selling a religion of lies. Religion is based on faith not science. They can't acknowledge reality because it would shatter their faith. They demonstrate repeatedly that they would rather destroy us and themselves to prevent their faith from betraying them.
    People will give their lives for their ideologies, and they don't choose only the accurate ones to sacrifice themselves for because they believe in the sanctity of their beliefs.

    As i said earlier (or was it another thread) lies and doublethink will work until the tide turns.

    This is about creating doubt.

    We can't even conclusively prove viral load is part of ME, its likely its somehow related but how and why we have no verification yet.

    What?
    The big difference is that they sell a specific piece of obvious fraud vs our mention of you might have this and it helped so and so. We are not selling the mentions nor are we creating fake science to "back" it up.
     
    Chezboo, Sarah94, DokaGirl and 7 others like this.
  4. Hip

    Hip Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    726
    OK, that's interesting.

    I understood it took many months for your ME/CFS symptoms in general to disappear after surgery (although Jeff's disappeared after only a few weeks), but I did not realize that the PEM symptom disappeared immediately post surgery.

    The first thing that comes to mind is reports from a few ME/CFS patients taking the parasympathomimetic drug pyridostigmine, who observed a large improvement or even elimination of their PEM. This suggests there may be some link between PEM and the parasympathetic.

    So perhaps the instant elimination of PEM after CCI/AAI surgery might be explained in terms of parasympathetic nervous system function restoration?
     
    Last edited: May 23, 2019
    Naomi10, DokaGirl, Guest 2176 and 5 others like this.
  5. Roy S

    Roy S Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    459
    Location:
    Illinois, USA
    Jen and Jeff,
    I don't think you are evading questions, but I've seen similar things happen in the past. If you had one place for all the available information people are seeking it might help a lot.
    FAQ's and all other good questions could be answered well once and you wouldn't have to answer them multiple times. Updates could be added.

    About all of my questions have been answered but it took a lot of extra time on most of those platforms to find the info. Finding something again could be difficult.
     
  6. andypants

    andypants Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,334
    Location:
    Norway
    I believe @Mattie mentioned no longer being able to turn his head normally, having to turn his body instead.

    Yup.

    I’m so glad Jen brought up conflicting feelings because my instinctive reaction to this story, after being surprised and happy that even one PwME has seen some well deserved improvement, was guilt. Guilt that maybe I haven’t done absolutely everything in my power to look into every possible test and treatment. What if there was something there all along?

    Realistically, I have done everything in my power, the power is just very limited. And of course I have a life that needs living, too. What little I have of it:) Ultimately it gives me hope that some of us actually do eventually come across something that makes a difference.
     
    Naomi10, Amw66, DokaGirl and 16 others like this.
  7. arewenearlythereyet

    arewenearlythereyet Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,092
    First of all congratulations for gaining your remission @JenB ...long may it last. I’ve never done aerobics but can’t quite imagine ever doing that kind of activity. That must be a weird feeling.

    I think from what you say ‘coming out” is the only thing you could do. I just wonder though whether elaborating too much on the circumstances and using phrases like “I don’t have ME any more” might be interpreted by journalists etc as something other than what you intend?

    Is there a plan to counter the negative press effect, and in particular how do you feel that the Unrest film should be used now ...are there plans for a re-release with further footage/follow up?

    Is seems a shame for this powerful and influential piece of work to be dismissed as not relevant anymore since you had another condition (just trying to think like the daily mail...which is quite unpleasant).

    Also have you spoken to Carol Monaghan MP about this?
     
    Binkie4, DokaGirl and MEMarge like this.
  8. JenB

    JenB Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    440
    Hi! I appreciate your concern and it breaks my heart a bit.

    I don’t think my recovering means that suddenly all this falls apart. Not only am I hardly the only patient in the film, I did in fact have ME (), AND I recovered via a means that is NOT inconsistent with current models of the disease. My CCI diagnosis does not preempt my ME diagnosis (in part because PEM and some of the other ME symptoms are not typically thought to be symptoms of CCI). This is new and strange and frankly wonderful territory, for both ME specialists *and* CCI specialists. I need to think more about this. I don’t think I fully understand what you are afraid might happen.

    I/Unrest are also not the focus of current campaigning—British patients are.

    The Daily Mail is the Daily Mail. Can’t do anything there but I doubt they will be covering this. In fact, news rarely just happens and it’s not like I am try to pitch media about my recovery. If something were ever to come up, there are experts stateside who could speak very eloquently about all of this.
     
    Sarah94, DokaGirl, MEMarge and 10 others like this.
  9. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,274
    Location:
    London, UK
    It would be very easy - at least in terms of checking the validity of the imaging. The people involved would just follow the responsible path that all medical researchers looking at new treatments should follow. It would cost nothing, other than a little time in the evening collating data and then asking colleagues to review it blind, which used to be part of routine quality control anyway. Then writing a manuscript to a journal.
     
  10. arewenearlythereyet

    arewenearlythereyet Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,092
    Yes I understand what you say and I think there isn’t anything wrong with talking about anecdotal experience at all.

    However I just think that there is a tendency for the press and media (and the general public) to oversimplify things (e.g. ME is about being tired). We have seen only recently some pretty poor articles that are clearly not well researched and give a misleading impression to the general public and potentially politicians and other stakeholders that we might want to influence.

    I’m not sure even when supportive that they have the ability to distinguish the nuances between having one invisible illness let alone two. I fear the tendency will be to go to a black and white position (you no longer have ME ...you got cured, ME is not real it’s really something else, the Unrest film was misleading, politicians have been duped, etc etc.)

    I think there is something you can do as a high profile figure in ME advocacy. That is to take control of the narrative of your story with these potential distortions in mind. I don’t think it’s up to British patients to decide this? They will need some sort of coordination and repetition of message as will all the other supporters and promoters of unrest? We also have the support from politicians to manage.

    I think that the word remission need to be emphasised wherever possible alongside the potential for relapse ...we have had enough distortions of recovery in the press from both PACE authors and sadly patients and celebrities. Miracle cure stories are a default go to now in the press.

    Don't get me wrong, this could be a way of reinforcing clear and meaningful messages if actively managed. I’m just very wary of what can be twisted and manipulated by some people that have a lot to lose. We also have the NICE guidelines being discussed and don’t really want any u turns in support at this critical stage.

    There are my worries ... I haven’t even thought about the validity of spine compression or whatever although it feels like this seems to be something that should be downplayed (or powder kept dry) in the press until we have more information. It might be just another blind alley. That doesn’t prevent it being discussed amongst the patient and researcher community though.

    I hope you don’t feel, this is pouring cold water on your remission ...which is great news ...I would also say that it would be totally understandable if you wanted to take some time out and just have a bit of ‘normal life’. Even resume your career ...run a marathon whatever...horizons opening over a relatively short period of time must be a bit strange after the years of them shrinking away.
     
    Naomi10, DokaGirl, JaneL and 6 others like this.
  11. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,274
    Location:
    London, UK
    I have seen more material from the internet, and searched around a bit more.

    I hope I have not been critical of Jen myself and I personally think putting out this story was the right thing to do. The difficult bit is how the community should respond, taking into account both Jen's personal peace of mind and the potential damage that might occur if others are encouraged to undergo surgery that they may not need.

    I am not a neurosurgeon but I worked alongside and referred patients to Alan Crockard, who at the time was considered perhaps the best craniocervical surgeon in the world and trained Henderson. I looked after people with CCI.

    I have come to the conclusion that I am 90% sure that there is a major scam going on in the commercial pain control sector focused on CCI in the context of 'EDS'. There is promotional material on the net going through all the stuff about upright MRIs and cervical traction tests apparently for 'EDS' CCI in the context of very varied and vague symptoms. But since the estimate is that one person in 75,000 will have this problem there is something not right about the presentation.

    The promotional material talks about upright MRI and gives example pictures. The first thing I noted is that the reason for the upright posture is to identify a Chiari abnormality - the cerebellum slipping down through the craniocervical junction. It is not to identify CCI itself. The other thing is that CCI is judged by an angle drawn on the image. The example shown has an angle that is said to be abnormal but the picture does not show any convincing neuropathology. Without knowing more I would be very sceptical of this. The sleep apnoea people have used angles to claim that wearing a prosthesis at night can improve the airway but when I challenged a colleague on this they admitted that the angle can change just by a slight shift in the patient's position. I may be wrong but these look like exactly the sorts of measurement than can be made to look abnormal when there is nothing really wrong.

    Note that the estimated prevalence of CCI with EDS is 1/75000 whereas the estimated prevalence of ME is 1/500. Also note that, as far as I know, there are no documented cases of people with ME developing demonstrable neurological damage from CCI. It seems that it has never got bad enough in the last fifty years to produce any irreversible neurological change - not even to produce clinical identifiable hyperreflexia. There are cases of people with cervical stenosis and ME but cervical stenosis is a quite different problem that is very common in older people, some of whom are bound to have ME.

    So things do not add up.

    What I think may be most interesting about the promotional material is the reference to the cervical traction test. I will do a new post on that.
     
  12. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,274
    Location:
    London, UK
    The promotional material on the net says that a definitive diagnosis of CCI can be made from a cervical traction test - where the person is an inpatient and has the head pulled away from the neck for a period of days using some sort of frame.

    I do not think this can be a valid way of establishing that ME symptoms are related to CCI. As everyone here knows, ME symptoms can appear to improve very significantly for short periods in all sorts of circumstances.

    In the simplest terms we cannot in any way discount a 'placebo effect' from a traction test.

    However, I was struck by the possibility that something more interesting might be going on.

    The term SEID emphasises the fact that many of the features of ME can be considered as forms of intolerance of stimuli. Light, sound, drugs, food, etc. are environmental stimuli. Exertion is in a sense an internal stimulus. We have several times discussed the possibility that the problem in ME is that the central nervous system cannot process and 'neutralise' or 'file away' continuing incoming stimuli. The problem of unrefreshing sleep would suggest that.

    Being connected up to a cervical traction frame is not trivial. You cannot move your head around. I suspect that the effect is a bit like trying to work on something using a mirror or the first day learning to drive - your sensory relation to the world is completely re-registered. Your vestibular apparatus will be providing no input. All your brain's 'predictive coding' based on reflex motor feedback will be blocked.

    It strikes me that it is not impossible that immobilising the neck might 'flip' whatever problem the CNS has with sensory stimuli back into normal function. Crucially, this would have nothing to do with there being anything wrong with the neck. Neck immobilisation might induce remission, but through breaking malfunctioning neurocomputational routines, not by relieving any supposed pressure on the brainstem.
     
  13. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,274
    Location:
    London, UK
    As always, my chief concern with all these issues is for the safety of children. It looks as if a parent has already taken a child for a standing MRI to be assessed for CCI. This I find very distressing. Even if I am wrong that the whole CCI/ME thing is a scam at least it looks like highly irresponsible clinical management without adequate documented evidence.

    It also seems that someone has died from this operation. It is important to note that people die with this surgery not because it is 'done badly' by an incompetent surgeon but because complications can occur whoever does the operation. Alan Crockard had a number of failures.
     
    Keebird, Naomi10, TiredSam and 24 others like this.
  14. chrisb

    chrisb Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,602
    We can assume that those who have died will be unable to respond to this. What is the degree of adverse response? Will there be people who have had an adverse response who would be able to make their situation known? Anonymously, if necessary.
     
    MSEsperanza and DokaGirl like this.
  15. Suffolkres

    Suffolkres Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,522
    In response to a thread elsewhere talking about Jen's condition pathway and the attendant implications for both patients/families and NHS services,
    I wrote

    "The other significant factor is her (Jen's) initial acute problem (in addition to her ME/CFS diagnosis) and diagnosis of thyroid dysfunction/disease/thyroid cancer.


    Jen is not the first person I know to have followed the pathway of ME/CFS and then to receive this diagnosis of thyroid cancer; after treatment, experiencing a 'recovery' from ME.



    This justifies our view that NICE must reconsider it's mantra of 'no more testing'; (and our local East Coast Community Health service ECCH's mantra of 'no ongoing care' and only therapy approaches to their services.)
    ECCH 'limitation of it's services' places patients at risk at the end of the day. It’s a Quality and Safety issue as well as a Human Rights and Equality one.


    This point was made to Suffolk CCG Governing Body this week....... and justifies our need for a mass complaint against the (BACME) NICE Waveney/Norfolk CCG/ECCH ME and CFS service 'Model"."
     
  16. lansbergen

    lansbergen Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    616
    Yep.
     
    DokaGirl and Marky like this.
  17. roller*

    roller* Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    249
    i thought, mecfs-DIAGNOSE requires normal thyroid values.
    otherwise it would be considered a thyroid-disease.

    does anyone have a link to the movie unrest, to watch it for free.
    cant afford netflix luxuries.
     
    Last edited: May 23, 2019
    DokaGirl likes this.
  18. Marky

    Marky Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    588
    Location:
    Norway
    Really intriguing hypothesis Jonathan! Something like that would make more sense of the recoveries to me.
     
    TiredSam and DokaGirl like this.
  19. obeat

    obeat Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    681
    Could this be tested in a clinical trial with neuroimaging? This makes far more sense.
     
    DokaGirl and andypants like this.
  20. Mithriel

    Mithriel Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,815
    Byron Hyde discovered a lot of his patients had thyroid cancer but it was dismissed as important because a lot of people have thyroid cancer without knowing it as it is very slowly progressive.

    What worries me about this sort of remission of symptoms is that the ME is still there in the background and people do too much and end up worse than before. Many people have had that experience and I ended up housebound and needing a wheelchair after I thought I was cured and went wild - well just doing 20 minute walks but it felt wild...

    My own experiences are not uncommon. I had a dreadful experience in hospital but my ME actually felt much better. Lying on a bed all day and getting fed instead of looking after 3 children helped a lot.

    When I was diagnosed as diabetic I was given metformin and the results were amazing. I felt great and even painted a tabletop in a few hours. Unfortunately it did not last, after a few weeks i was back to what I had been before the diabetes made me exhausted.

    Also Dr David Bell did a study where he looked at how his patients were doing many years after the epidemic. He foudn that a lot of them said they were recovered but that when you looked at what they did they were still very restricted. He concluded that they no longer experienced OI or POTS so they felt better but were still actually suffering from ME. If this operation cures OI then patients symptoms may seem much better but the ME is still going on in the background.
     
    boolybooly, Grigor, Sid and 7 others like this.

Share This Page