Jamie Strong, a member of Karl Morten's team at Oxford, nominated for the National Diversity Awards

Andy

Retired committee member


Jamie Strong | Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford | Oxford, UK
Positive Role Model (Disability)
..
A recommendation from a colleague:
“Jamie is inspirational because he started from a place of despair; from being disabled by ME/CFS, to securing a place for himself in research by advancing our ME/CFS knowledge and thereby, is an advocate for ME/CFS patients who are being stigmatised and misunderstood as lazy and unmotivated. Throughout his employment, Jamie has shown exceptional talent in human biology, medical statistics and R programming, and so it came as no surprise when Jamie won a place on Oxford University’s MSc Medical Statistics course (part-time) without a BSc. It must be noted that Jamie has not become better from ME/CFS; significant adjustments are made for Jamie to be continually employed by the University and Jamie, and this has clearly brought fruition to our understanding of human biology.”
https://nationaldiversityawards.co.uk/nominate/22663/

As far as I can see, the tweet refers to voting but it's actually nominating Jamie, so there is a little more effort required in that you need to explain why you are nominating him.
 
Either there is variance between their and my understanding of the words 'nomination' and 'vote' or there is seemingly some form of site error occuring.

My understanding is that once someone has been successfully nominated it is unusual for the vote to be in the form of renominating the same person.

The top of the page says he needs votes, but the bottom is demanding a short essay on why he should be successfully nominated.

Inconsistent

Importantly with no way to cast a vote, only a way to nominate someone who has already been successfully nominated, and should be past that process.

Of course, if my understanding of the words 'nominate and 'vote' is flawed and incomplete, I hope they start using this method for general electoral purposes.

The idea of an original 2000 word short essay being required to cast a vote for a MP seems like 'fun', and could radically change British politics.
 
Either there is variance between their and my understanding of the words 'nomination' and 'vote' or there is seemingly some form of site error occuring.

My understanding is that once someone has been successfully nominated it is unusual for the vote to be in the form of renominating the same person.

The top of the page says he needs votes, but the bottom is demanding a short essay on why he should be successfully nominated.

Inconsistent

Importantly with no way to cast a vote, only a way to nominate someone who has already been successfully nominated, and should be past that process.

Of course, if my understanding of the words 'nominate and 'vote' is flawed and incomplete, I hope they start using this method for general electoral purposes.

The idea of an original 2000 word short essay being required to cast a vote for a MP seems like 'fun', and could radically change British politics.
Oh, this is just how the awards work. I know a few people who've won or been nominated. Think of it as voting to shortlist, rather than voting to win outright.

The public can nominate literally anyone, so they balance that out by requiring people to vote for nominees. That way, only people with a certain number of votes make it to the shortlist, rather than everyone who gets a single vote.

Incidentally, I went to check more info, and then (lovely surprise!) saw my mum in the purple image (on the left) here: https://nationaldiversityawards.co.uk/categories/

It looks like she enjoyed the party last year: https://nationaldiversityawards.co.uk/national-diversity-awards-winners-interview-touchstone/
 
I hope he wins but I am unable to participate in this, never having met him, or heard of him, previously.

A nomination is different from a vote.

Literally every word I submitted would be a lie.
 
Literally every word I submitted would be a lie.
Perhaps you could say something like 'Recognition of Jamie's achievements would help to make the millions of people around the world (or x million people in the UK) with this life-sapping (or some other negative adjective) disease more visible and better understood'.

I have heard of Jamie before, I think it would be great if he was a winner of this award.
 
That won't work, I don't know any of those things.

A vote is a vote, not really subject to interpretation.

A nomination is a public statement recommending someone for something, giving, usually personal, reasons. After submission it is subject to interpretation, the beliefs and bias of whomever processes it. It may be disregarded, it may be weighted as to relevance, or because of who wrote it. It is not a vote, all nominations are not equal.

I realise others don't seem to have this problem but I cannot nominate someone I know nothing about, other than the publicity blurb associated with the nomination campaign. That is not a sensible basis for nominating someone, as everyone else will have glowing nomination publicity as well.

If he loses by 1 vote then I will feel bad, but this is not an acceptable system.
 
Yeah, fair points.

There's some information here, but not enough I expect.

https://www.meassociation.org.uk/20...ance-of-achieving-its-target-2-december-2016/

Jamie – son of ME Association trustee Nicki Strong – fell ill with a tummy bug on a family holiday to Egypt in 2005. An active teenager who went running several times a week, he never fully recovered, and was forced to drop out of university. Lara, now 25, developed symptoms a few years after her brother, following the onset of glandular fever.

https://www.meassociation.org.uk/20...-the-oxford-research-centre-13th-august-2018/
 
Here’s some information about the work he’s doing with Karl Morten’s team at the University of Oxford:

Jamie Strong
DATA ASSISTANT

Elucidating metabolomics correlates with Autonomic physiology in ME/CFS (Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome)

I am currently working in collaboration with the Oxford Chemistry Department, and Nicoloaus Copernicus University, Torun Poland, to analyse a comprehensive dataset comprising variables of symptomatology, autonomic physiology with each case matched to their respective plasma metabolome.

Our initial analysis led by Professor James McCullagh (Chemistry) focused on the coverage of a broad spectrum of metabolites in plasma, quantified under different methods, to include comprehensive coverage of the TCA cycle, which combined with other methods, further covering Amino Acids and Lipids and glycolytic intermediates enabled surrogate indications of reactions pertaining to anaplerotic metabolism. Multivariate models were devised using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Orthogonal Projections to Latent Structures Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA) to enable differentiation of cohorts.

My work at present builds on the data yielded from the multivariate analyses to determine correlation of parameters of physiology and symptomatology with the metabolomics datasets, ultimately enabling us to advance toward potential candidate metabolites that may be implicated in the mediation of clinical sequelae.

We aim to build on and adopt a similar approach in our upcoming project in collaboration with the London School of Hygeine and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) and sponsored by the ME Association (MEA) which will comprise a larger cohort, with a fatigued control group (Multiple Sclerosis), in addition to healthy controls.

https://www.wrh.ox.ac.uk/team/jamie-strong
 
I either heard or read Karl Morton talking about Jamie and his value to his research team. From what I remember he considers him a very valuable asset to the team with excellent analytical skills (or something) and they also particularly value having someone in the team who, with his daily struggles to manage to work within what his illness allows is an inspiration to them to try to help solve ME.

He sounds like a very worthy candidate for the award and I wish him well, but like others here, I'm not sure about writing a nomination. I would vote if it were simply a matter of ticking a box.
 
Back
Top Bottom