His critiques involved an article he was sent to peer-review, not the book itself. She decided to make changes to the chapter in the book after the contention over the article heated up.
Fair point,
. Although I have to admit that I think of Dave as more of a scientist than journalist, but that might be because of his academic position and rigour. We need more journalists like that!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.