Havana Syndrome: U.S. and Canadian diplomats targeted with possible weapon causing brain injury and neurological symptoms

Merged thread

‘Havana syndrome’ symptoms of diplomats in Cuba are not mass hysteria

Since no one is posting this yet I'm going to right ahead.

Replace a few words and this argument could be applied to ME. The main arguments are the same, although the body of evidence is comparably small for this case compared to the decades of work on ME. They are also quite likely to be correct in this case, mass hysteria is simply not a serious thing.

Except it's written by one of the most ardent ME deniers: Edward Shorter. He most likely retains his belief, arguing exactly the other side of this very argument without skipping a beat.

Ironically I'm seeing quite a bit of disagreement in the comments that basically echo the exact same arguments Shorter himself would make to defend his beliefs about ME. Cognitive dissonance is one hell of a drug.

https://theconversation.com/havana-...iplomats-in-cuba-are-not-mass-hysteria-118678
 
Last edited by a moderator:
:wtf:???!

Does status of the victims play a role in credibility here?

Interesting that ME effects people from all walks of life, but no matter, all are stigmatized and not given the benefit of the doubt, as in this case.


And - deep pelvic pain caused by endometriosis is still seen as psychological by some.
 
Let me misquote:

"Whether an occult core of organic pathology exists, from which these waves of illness attribution radiate, is a question that remains to be answered. But no clinician doing research today on Havana Syndrome can afford to be unmindful of Robert Aronowitz's warning that "A market for somatic labels exists in the large pool of "stressed-out" or somaticizing patients who seek to disguise an emotional complaint or to "upgrade" their diagnosis from a nebulous one to a legitimate disease"...The evidence of somatization is that its victims take their symptoms, psychogenic in nature, to be evidence of organic disease (Lipowski 1988) It is a praiseworthy and humane characteristic for physicians to empathise with patients, sharing their hopes and fears. Yet one must be very cautious that empathy does not lead into a scientific blind alley.

CAUTION I replaced the words "chronic fatigue syndrome" in the original with "Havana Syndrome".

This is taken from Chronic fatigue in historical perspective. Edward Shorter.
1993 Chronic Fatigue syndrome. Wiley, Chichester (Ciba Foundation Symposium 173) p6-22

It must always be remembered that Shorter is a professor of social history and frequent writer of somewhat lurid books. Sometimes he utters sense, sometimes not.
 
I will just bore you with a strange further early round of hysterical discussion in early ME debate. As you all know Slater gave a lecture in 1964, published in 1965, on Diagnosis of "hysteria". At the end of that year Walsh wrote a supposed rebuttal. As this included an oblique reference to Royal Free disease I assumed that this was a subtext in the discussion. This may have been incorrect.

There was an intervening event-the Blackburn school "mass hysteria". I think that was in October. There must then have been articles in the Times and Telegraph linking this outbreak to Royal Free disease, because Ramsey very quickly wrote to the Lancet rebutting this suggestion, with cogent argument. It appears that Beard then supported McEvedy in his study of that outbreak, before they went on to co-author the papers which we all know and love. That Blackburn "mass hysteria" was very useful for some.

Beard's obituary records that he had an extensive private practice. It would be interesting to know something of the nature of that practice.
 
DokaGirl said:
Does status of the victims play a role in credibility here?
Click to expand...

I would guess it almost certainly does. The majority of diplomats are probably men and are therefore much more likely to be believed about anything medically related. And in fact, just being a diplomat makes them much more likely to be believed than most other adults, particularly female ones.

And the idea that endometriosis is not hysterical in origin was (very slowly) gaining ground in the UK for a while but with the rise of MUS as the explanation for everything it is sinking back to being psychogenic again.
 
strategist said:
Can we rule out that psychogenic illness isn't merely a label for every as of yet undiscovered disease mechanism?

Has it ever been definitely been demonstrated to exist?
Click to expand...
I'd estimate that 99% of alleged cases of psychosomatic illness are misdiagnosed.

It possibly exists but it's extremely rare. Unfortunately there is zero accountability or oversight and most psychosomatic diagnoses are merely implied, lazily labeled without any effort or due diligence.

But despite well over a century of relentless efforts, it still hasn't been demonstrated so it's more likely that it doesn't exist at all, a mere tiny turtle all the way down into our ignorance.
 
DokaGirl said:
:wtf:???!

Does status of the victims play a role in credibility here?

Interesting that ME effects people from all walks of life, but no matter, all are stigmatized and not given the benefit of the doubt, as in this case.


And - deep pelvic pain caused by endometriosis is still seen as psychological by some.
Click to expand...
The earlier outbreaks mostly impacted medical professionals so that's puzzling. I think that once someone is lumped into the "patients" camp they lose all credibility no matter who they were before and status has no impact.
 
chrisb said:
Let me misquote:

"Whether an occult core of organic pathology exists, from which these waves of illness attribution radiate, is a question that remains to be answered. But no clinician doing research today on Havana Syndrome can afford to be unmindful of Robert Aronowitz's warning that "A market for somatic labels exists in the large pool of "stressed-out" or somaticizing patients who seek to disguise an emotional complaint or to "upgrade" their diagnosis from a nebulous one to a legitimate disease"...The evidence of somatization is that its victims take their symptoms, psychogenic in nature, to be evidence of organic disease (Lipowski 1988) It is a praiseworthy and humane characteristic for physicians to empathise with patients, sharing their hopes and fears. Yet one must be very cautious that empathy does not lead into a scientific blind alley.

CAUTION I replaced the words "chronic fatigue syndrome" in the original with "Havana Syndrome".

This is taken from Chronic fatigue in historical perspective. Edward Shorter.
1993 Chronic Fatigue syndrome. Wiley, Chichester (Ciba Foundation Symposium 173) p6-22

It must always be remembered that Shorter is a professor of social history and frequent writer of somewhat lurid books. Sometimes he utters sense, sometimes not.
Click to expand...
Wow. I genuinely feel stupider for reading this. The lengths some people will go to justify their beliefs is really impressive. Assumptions built on assumptions and cemented by speculation and conjecture. What a word salad.
 
rvallee said:
The earlier outbreaks mostly impacted medical professionals so that's puzzling. I think that once someone is lumped into the "patients" camp they lose all credibility no matter who they were before and status has no impact.
Click to expand...

I am finding it difficult to explain what I mean but medical professionals who became ill were felt by their colleagues as just not being up to it, basically losers who were not able to keep up the pace. The long hours as junior doctors and so on were almost an initiation rite if you see what I mean. I read about a doctor with undiagnosed MS who came up against that sort of attitude.

The other thing is that it is one thing writing about diplomats but ME is so horrible, no treatment, no idea of what causes it so no way to take precautions to prevent it, that it must be much easier on the mind to believe someone doing the same job as you is psychologically weak (something you are not) rather than they have a devastating illness that could get you next.
 
It seems to be pesticide poisoning.

The researchers found that since 2016, Cuba launched an aggressive campaign against mosquitoes to stop the spread of the Zika virus.

The embassies actively sprayed in offices, as well as inside and outside diplomatic residences — sometimes five times more frequently than usual. Many times, spraying operations were carried out every two weeks, according to embassy records.

Toxicological analysis of the Canadian victims confirmed the presence of pyrethroid and organophosphate — two compounds found in fumigation products.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
The psychiatrist involved in this study insists it's not mass hysteria

Cindy Calkin, a psychiatrist and member of the multidisciplinary research team, said she categorically rejects the idea of mass hysteria.

"I have interviewed all but one or two of [the victims] and I haven't found any evidence of psychiatric disorder. This is a very strong group, very resilient and there is no evidence of mass hysteria," she said. "Part of the diagnostic of mass hysteria is that there is no underlying other medical cause that can be found. And we [found] underlying medical evidence."
Click to expand...

The reasoning here is interesting because it suggests that normal human beings that receive ordinary medical investigations might get a mass hysteria diagnosis instead.

Do you have to be from an upper socioeconomic background, part of a strong group and very resilient, with million dollar plus medical workups to escape a mass hysteria diagnosis?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom