1. Sign our petition calling on Cochrane to withdraw their review of Exercise Therapy for CFS here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 15th April 2024 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

Germany: Restraining psychiatric patients requires court order

Discussion in 'Other health news and research' started by MSEsperanza, Jul 25, 2018.

  1. MSEsperanza

    MSEsperanza Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,857
    Location:
    betwixt and between
    Nellie, Inara, Pechius and 7 others like this.
  2. adambeyoncelowe

    adambeyoncelowe Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,732
  3. Amw66

    Amw66 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,329
    Sad contrast to where the direction things are taking in UK
     
    Sly Saint and Skycloud like this.
  4. adambeyoncelowe

    adambeyoncelowe Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,732
    I wonder if the rest of the EU will follow suit? Too bad it won't matter for the rest of us, any more.
     
    NelliePledge likes this.
  5. Inara

    Inara Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,734
    I have to say Germany is NOT taking a better direction.

    The Constitutional Court indeed says forced fixation restricts the basic right of freedom. But until June 30th 2019 the states are allowed to continue with it. The Baden-Wuerttemberg and the Bavarian legislature are obliged to bring about a constitutional state by 30 June 2019 (which means the following: "To ensure the protection of those affected by a custodial attachment, a daily judicial on-call duty is required covering the period from 6:00 to 21:00." I.e. a judge can direct the fixation. Which is common practice.)

    See the verdict: https://www.bundesverfassungsgerich...idungen/DE/2018/07/rs20180724_2bvr030915.html

    So the court says it's against the constitution, but Germany can (and will) continue with it.

    I fear this will be sold as a success of human rights and "democracy" when in fact, it's not.
     
    Last edited: Jul 25, 2018
  6. Inara

    Inara Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,734
    If UK decides to make fixation possible without a judge's verdict, indeed, one could go to the European Court (edit: I think).
     
    Last edited: Jul 25, 2018
    MSEsperanza and adambeyoncelowe like this.
  7. Amw66

    Amw66 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,329
    Until March 2019..
     
    Skycloud and adambeyoncelowe like this.
  8. Inara

    Inara Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,734
    I don't understand?
     
  9. Amw66

    Amw66 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,329
    UK leaves EU in March 2019 - looking more likely to be crashing out without any deals, so likely no / limited EU Court jurisdiction
     
    adambeyoncelowe and Inara like this.
  10. adambeyoncelowe

    adambeyoncelowe Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,732
    Yeah, we'll all be buggered. Not that the government ever listens to the courts anyway these days. The DWP does what it wants.
     
    Inara and Trish like this.
  11. Luther Blissett

    Luther Blissett Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,678
    The European Court of Human Rights is not affected by Brexit?
     
    Inara likes this.
  12. MSEsperanza

    MSEsperanza Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,857
    Location:
    betwixt and between
    I think that's right, because the Council of Europe is not identical with the Council of the EU:

    wikipedia:
    "Unlike the EU, the Council of Europe cannot make binding laws, but it does have the power to enforce select international agreements reached by European states on various topics. The best known body of the Council of Europe is the European Court of Human Rights, which enforces the European Convention on Human Rights."
     
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2018
    Inara, Trish and adambeyoncelowe like this.
  13. adambeyoncelowe

    adambeyoncelowe Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,732
    I think I remember this. Leave voters wanted to get rid of the ECHR for protecting terrorists etc, but it wasn't going to be affected by the vote anyway.
     
    Skycloud, Luther Blissett and Trish like this.

Share This Page