MrMagoo
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
I suppose AI is only as good as the instructions it has, rubbish in = rubbish out.I think the problem is probably that it's relying too much on AI which hasn't the sense to see that someone who has recorded between 400 and 1000 steps on each of the 14 days it's tracked so far is not going to be doing over 6000 steps today. And someone who only moves about for very few minutes at a time and has long spells with no steps isn't going to be cooking a meal for half an hour with 400 steps in that half hour.
It's still telling me at after 10pm that I'm doing very well having achieved about 10% of my planned 6000+ steps.
I honestly feel like it’s not even AI’s fault, it sounds like they’ve found an old Fitbit app and tweaked a few algorithms. It just sounds very much like the start point was a well person and some bits have been re-organised.
Actually now I think of it, it’s probably been trained on the ten million or so versions of “how to pace” guidelines that exist and are all bunkum. Who was it who was advised to break up their journey to the library over a few weeks? It’s reminding me of that!
Day one - walked half way to library. Unpacked flask and sleeping bag. Found a bench to sleep on.
Day two - walked up to the library doorway, which will be my bed for the night, ahead of tomorrow’s big push in to the library to choose a book!
Also though, how bonkers is it that a paternalistic app is instructing you on the minutiae of your day.
It will be interesting (if you can face it) to see how it deals with you repeatedly not complying with the recommendations. Will it start demanding less of you, or will it push you more?