Esther12
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
I was sure I'd seen this posted here, but now cannot see it.
They say "The early involvement of occupational health practitioners is recommended to maximize the chances of maintaining employment." - Not seen any good evidence for any intervention intended to improve employment outcomes for CFS though.
This is published in journal from the Society of Occupational Medicine - I wonder if it's a precursor to more spin from Ira Madan, who has a long history of promoting CBT/GET on the basis of very weak evidence?
Edit:
Paywall, https://academic.oup.com/occmed/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/occmed/kqz108/5543260
Sci hub, https://sci-hub.se/10.1093/occmed/kqz108
They say "The early involvement of occupational health practitioners is recommended to maximize the chances of maintaining employment." - Not seen any good evidence for any intervention intended to improve employment outcomes for CFS though.
Background
Work status in people with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) has not been extensively researched.
Aims
To explore occupational outcomes in patients with CFS by socio-demographic, well-being and disease characteristics.
Methods
We assessed cross-sectional data from patients attending a UK specialist CFS treatment service between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2014. The main outcome was self-reported current employment status: currently in employment, temporarily interrupted employment or permanently interrupted employment. Other variables included sex, age, ethnicity, education, marital status, CFS duration, fatigue severity, anxiety, depression, activity limitations and functional impairment. We used multinominal logistic regression models to identify factors associated with current work status.
Results
Two hundred and seventy-nine (55%) patients were currently working, with 83 (16%) reporting temporarily interrupted employment and 146 (29%) stopping work altogether. Factors strongly associated with permanently interrupted employment were older age (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 5.24; 95% CI 2.67–10.28), poorer functioning (AOR 6.41; 95% CI 3.65–11.24) and depressive symptoms (AOR 2.89; 95% CI 1.82–4.58) compared to patients currently working. Higher educated patients (AOR 0.60; 95% CI 0.37–0.97) and being in a relationship (AOR 0.34; 95% CI 0.21–0.54) were associated with being currently employed. Anxiety symptoms were common; 230 patients (45%) met caseness criteria.
Conclusions
Many patients with CFS were not working. This was exacerbated by high levels of depressive symptoms. Health professionals should assess co-morbid mental health conditions and consider treatment options when patients with CFS present themselves. The early involvement of occupational health practitioners is recommended to maximize the chances of maintaining employment.
This is published in journal from the Society of Occupational Medicine - I wonder if it's a precursor to more spin from Ira Madan, who has a long history of promoting CBT/GET on the basis of very weak evidence?
Edit:
Paywall, https://academic.oup.com/occmed/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/occmed/kqz108/5543260
Sci hub, https://sci-hub.se/10.1093/occmed/kqz108
Last edited by a moderator: