Review Evaluation of Tools to Assess Symptoms and Symptom Severity in Patients With [MUPS]: A Systematic Review... 2024 Baboo et al

Discussion in 'Other psychosomatic news and research' started by Andy, Apr 16, 2024.

  1. Andy

    Andy Committee Member

    Messages:
    22,003
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    Full title: Evaluation of Tools to Assess Symptoms and Symptom Severity in Patients With Medically Unexplained Physical Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis

    Abstract
    A substantial portion of patients presenting to healthcare settings exhibit physical symptoms lacking clear, demonstrable organic causes. Accurate assessment of symptom severity is crucial for documenting outcomes and establishing treatment efficacy. This systematic review and narrative synthesis aims to provide researchers with insights into available and validated tools for assessing medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS).

    It involved comprehensive searches across electronic databases, including PubMed, Wiley, and Cochrane, adhering to PRISMA and COSMIN guidelines. The study comprised two phases: Phase 1 systematically reviewed tools for assessing MUPS symptoms and severity, while Phase 2 conducted a narrative synthesis of their measurement properties, focusing on validity and reliability.

    Out of 14,459 records, 191 articles were identified, leading to the recognition of 16 validated tools for assessing MUPS symptoms and severity. Most tools demonstrated excellent internal consistency and structural validity. However, the majority lacked cross-cultural validity.

    The choice of tools for the assessment of MUPS will assist clinicians and researchers in determining the severity of MUPS and developing a tailored treatment plan to improve the physical and psychological functioning of these patients.

    Open access, https://www.cureus.com/articles/224...-systematic-review-and-narrative-synthesis#!/
     
  2. Sean

    Sean Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    7,243
    Location:
    Australia
    structural validity

    Is that the same as content validity?
     
    alktipping and rvallee like this.

Share This Page