'Alem Matthees' especially seems clearly written all over this.
Would he really want to be associated with such a band of self-congratulatory self-serving ethically corrupt morally bankrupt malodorous imposters?'Alem Matthees' especially seems clearly written all over this.
I have already decided that if I am ever offered a knighthood . . . .
To be honest I haven't done anything that puts me in the running yet, I just like to be prepared for all eventualities.@TiredSam Do you have a view as to what contribution that your future knighthood would be in recognition of?
Probably simplest if I just refuse rather than join the establishment vowing to changing things from the inside. That could go horribly wrong.@TiredSam I think you should graciously accept any offer to be in the big tent. While you are in there could you lobby to strip all the assets from the monarchy, modernise the House of Lords including removing the ability of the prime insisted to nominate his wife's hairdresser for a peerage and use the proceeds/savings to fund the NHS? I think hesseltine can go ...he never shows up anyway so doesn't really earn his money.
Sense About Science probably just likes attracting attention by honoring "controversial" (aka abusive and fraudulent) nominees.
True but one twitter account by one person is NOTYurk.
The bully rewarded. Seriously?
Hum, this element is missing to make Saint Esther a perfect marthyr figure.
Btw this twitter account has allways been a bad idea, not funny and too easy a target...
Yes Alem should be nominated'Alem Matthees' especially seems clearly written all over this.
Can't help thinking there's a lot of funny handshakes going on behind the scenes. Probably virtual funny handshakes these days.I’m trying to get my head around why an organisation would give such a prize - what is the point of it? And this makes the most sense to me!
Self serving organisation using self serving ‘scientists’ to self promote.
Probably sunshine as well, but that's not in shot thank god.View attachment 924
Edited to add - can you see the halo?
[My bold]Sir John Maddox, whose name this prize commemorates, was a passionate and tireless champion and defender of science, engaging with difficult debates and inspiring others to do the same.
The prize is open to nominations for any kind of public activity, including all forms of writing, speaking and public engagement, in any of the following areas:
- Addressing misleading information about scientific or medical issues.
- Bringing sound evidence to bear in a public or policy debate.
- Helping people to make sense of a complex scientific issue.
There we go then ...Wesseley is a member of the advisory council.
As he was at the time he "won" the prize as well.Wesseley is a member of the advisory council......There we go then ....
No way. Really? I suppose nothing should surprise me.As he was at the time he "won" the prize as well.
Yes, really. Shame is not in his vocabulary, apparently.No way. Really? I suppose nothing should surprise me.
No "motivational chats" or brown nosing behind the scenes there then. It's so good to feel reassured by the system isn't itNo way. Really? I suppose nothing should surprise me.