Arvo
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
That makes it a bit more complicated, I think. The conflict of interest would be more apparent if it were an independent business than if it's part of their responsibilities as university employees. Hm.
Maybe, but it's still a big problem IMO. Dutch health care has been deliberately commercialised, so if hospital A "specialises" in a specific treatment for a medical or psychiatric problem and earns money via insurance company reimbursement for that treatment, then I think it's unethical if the researchers of that same hospital (edited to add: that also make a living providing that specific treatment) are the main ones studying the efficacy of the treatment, especially when they are already announcing that they will provide the treatment on a big scale if proven effective, and will develop a related therapist training course that I expect to be monetized as well.
I don't know what the deal is with AMC or VUmc (they are university affiliated), but several dutch hospitals can be owned by shareholders and ran as a business that needs to make profit (and one that can go bankrupt and close down).
And the NKCV is different: it seems to be part of the care provided by the AMC psych department, but as an independent institute it's not part of the AMC psych department itself. It'd be interesting to know how financial reimbursement from health insurance companies are distributed among NKCV (that profiles itself as an independent treatment center) and the AMC psychiatry department (that refers patients to the NKCV).
Last edited: