neophyte32
Established Member (Voting Rights)
Is this false advertising? Or not ?
Nature News actually reported on this development. I don't think I am allowed to share the article because it requires a subscription (which I have). I can share this one quote that might be the most important takeaway.Why ME/CFS Biomarker Headlines Keep Failing to Deliver
Every few years, headlines appear claiming that scientists have finally found a biomarker for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). Each time, the community feels a surge of hope: maybe this is it—the long-awaited diagnostic test that will legitimize the disease and speed up treatment research.
And yet, decades later, we still don’t have a clinically validated biomarker. The latest announcement about the EpiSwitch blood test is just the newest chapter in this long story of excitement and disappointment.
Why a Biomarker for ME/CFS Matters
A biomarker—a measurable biological signal that identifies a disease—could change everything for ME/CFS. It could shorten the years-long diagnostic delays, help distinguish ME/CFS from overlapping illnesses, and guide treatment development (Jason et al., 2023).
But identifying one has proven incredibly difficult. ME/CFS is a heterogeneous condition. No two patients are the same, and the biological pathways involved—immune, metabolic, vascular, and neurological—are deeply interconnected (Proal & VanElzakker, 2025).
The Pattern: Discovery, Hype, and Disappointment
The ME/CFS field has followed a predictable pattern for years:
This cycle has played out with cytokine panels (Montoya et al., 2017), mitochondrial enzyme assays (Armstrong et al., 2015), metabolomic signatures (Naviaux et al., 2016), and red blood cell deformability (Saha et al., 2019). Each produced intriguing findings, but none proved specific or stable enough to serve as a diagnostic test.
- A small study identifies a biological difference between patients and healthy controls.
- The media declares it a “breakthrough blood test.”
- The findings fail to replicate in larger, more diverse groups.
- The discovery fades—until the next big claim.
![]()
ME/CFS Biomarkers: Why Every New Blood Test Isn’t the Breakthrough It Seems — Post-Viral Nutrition
Every few years, new headlines promise a biomarker for ME/CFS. Learn why most fail, what’s behind the EpiSwitch test, and why real progress will take a cluster of biomarkers.www.postviralnutrition.com
Don’t take this a legal advice because I don’t have a legal background, but I think fair use generally allows for sharing a fairly large chunk of the article for non-commercial comment or criticism.Nature News actually reported on this development. I don't think I am allowed to share the article because it requires a subscription (which I have). I can share this one quote that might be the most important takeaway.
“I think it’s really cool they brought this method to the field,” says Katie Glass, a molecular biologist who studies ME/CFS at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York. “As far as it being a biomarker, my enthusiasm would be pretty tempered because the cohort is very small and they looked at only very severe patients.”
The tools available to researchers keep improving.
![]()
First proposed blood test for chronic fatigue syndrome: what scientists think
A blood test has achieved 96% accuracy in diagnosing the condition in a small study of individuals. What does the test detect, and is it a biomarker of the condition?www.nature.com
Turns out, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) and long Covid have a few things in common. For one, they're notoriously tricky to diagnose. So when researchers said they developed a blood test that may be able to detect both of these conditions, our curiosity was piqued.
In case you're not familiar with the diseases, CFS is a disease that causes extreme, life-altering fatigue, per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). It's estimated that it impacts 3.3 million people in the US. In the UK, recent research suggests that approximately 403,000 people are living with ME/CFS – roughly 0.6% of the population – though older estimates put the figure closer to 250,000.
Long Covid is a chronic condition that happens after someone has a Covid-19 infection, with symptoms like fatigue, trouble breathing, and brain fog lasting for at least three months, per the CDC. It's affected roughly two million people in the UK.
While the study focused on CFS, there is some biological overlap with long Covid, says Dmitry Pshezhetskiy, PhD, lead study author and research fellow at the University of East Anglia.
Basically, because the two conditions may create similar changes (called biological "signatures") in DNA and biology that are detectable on a blood test, this CFS test could eventually be adapted and tweaked in order to detect long Covid. Still, more and larger studies will need to confirm all of this.
What does this mean for patients?
“It would be hugely helpful—incredibly valuable—to have a test for long Covid,” says James C. Jackson, PsyD, research professor of Medicine at Vanderbilt Medical Center and author of Clearing the Fog: From Surviving to Thriving with Long Covid—A Practical Guide. “In the absence of an objective test, diagnosing long Covid is challenging and, often, it is a diagnosis of exclusion—meaning that if clinicians can't come up with other explanations, it is only then that they land on a diagnosis of long Covid.” This process takes a lot of time and resources and can be “incredibly frustrating” for patients, Jackson says.
Similarly, for CFS, diagnosis is often based on symptoms and ruling out other causes, which can take months or even years. A reliable blood test would give patients faster answers.
Ultimately, figuring out where these two illnesses overlap can help guide researchers into developing targeted treatments to help get to the root of what is causing these conditions, Pshezhetskiy says.