Ah OK so from reading through am I right in thinking it is 'DR Burnt Out' that wrote it - will look up who that is later
But intrigued particularly by this, which is going on, straight after the DecodeME findings paras in this article, (I don't know whether it is attempting to use non sequitur by doing so - hence my next question) to then suggest CFS< Fibro and PTSD all have similar etiology.
And then rambles into using this suggestion to then push about the 'neighbourhood health' move being about basically 'MUS-ing' ME/CFS - cost after all they are all the same according to people like this.
SO my question is that if DR Burnt out is claiming fibro, CFS and PTSD are 'overlapping conditions with similar etiology' in an article which has almost certainly been written entirely because the DecodeME results are out
Then how much does the DecodeME findings say that these aren't 'overlapping conditions' ? I guess I'm looking to understand what is the correct wording vs the genetic findings of 8 genes help us certainly in pointing towards where answers might be in mechanisms and potentially cures/therapies that might help.
Is there anything similar for fibro, PTSD or any other conditions we get lumped and dumped with?
And of course the finding of anxiety and depression having a very different pattern I guess means that their claims of either caused by or 'perpetuating after the initial virus' (which they've hidden in the term 'central sensitisation' now?) can be shown to be back to front or alternatively putting unnecessary 'mental illness pathology labels' on the actual cause even where association might be claimed because bullying, stress, misery, pressure on the body via eg the financial and punitive and unkind regime
isn't actually the 'stress, depression or anything else pathological' that bps type people want to do a switch and bait as when they start using that in a 'causal/perpetuator claim' instead of saying 'and on top of that making the ME/CFS worse directly, it is going to make people pretty miserable in different ways, if this is done to them etc as it is unkind [just like it would if it was done to those who have cancer or Parkinsons or MS or heart problems]'.
ie can we start to nail an answer to this one, because I think it is pretty important to both nail it, and to show that we are far above these 'pretenders/contenders for the gravy train' in being able to understand what gene findings
can confirm
isn't true any longer - which has been used in the past merely by assertion with no evidence, vs what it can't but it probably makes very unlikely/it a silly thing for them to keep saying now it shows they aren't connected.
JUst because you can make people miserable or anxious as well as their ME/CFS or heart condition worse by bullying them financially, refusing adjustments or acknowledgement of the disability level, or spreading rumours its in their mind doesn't of course make these illnesses 'connected' other than that behaviour towards human beings being a very bad thing for which there are actions--> consequences, and no 'CBT nonsense' doesn't either mediate it or make it go away by thinking differently about being bullied or broke or magicking up health you don't have to be able to tackle said things as those doing the actions might like to pretend it claims I assume.
And how have they gotten away with this central sensitisation nonsense claim straight after DecodeME, is it because they didn't mention which 8 genes they were? Let's be honest to me this claim of 'becoming more sensitised' or we all know for many it means 'being over sensitive' and the PTSD/trauma nonsense is still clearly about trying to push the only CBT they know that even really works, but only when someone actually has a proper matched diagnosis of eg a phobia or very specific PTSD incident which is now over but/and can be tackled with exposure therapy. That's what their HPA made-up stuff seems to illogically have been concocted around the assumption of. We just need to learn to 'calm our system when we build up our exposure'. It's the same nonsense fear-aversion not very well disguised at all and if those pushing it don't know that then they shouldn't have a license to be talking to or about any patients on any of these topics because they don't have the capacity to be understanding or learning in the area they think they are operating in clearly.
Grrr