AndyPandy
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Well worth watching the live stream of the Q and A with David Tuller although it was punctuated by problems with streaming.
Interesting to hear from David Tuller about how he became interested in ME and what keeps him motivated to keep advocating on our behalf.
In Australia, he plans to have meetings with politicians to lobby on our behalf and hopes to engage with mainstream media. He is also gathering material for future articles.
Grateful for his efforts on our behalf.
The Q and A:
I'm not able to put together a summary of the session but here are a few issues regarding questions from the audience:
I found the male doctor's assertions disturbing:
. That GPs are frequently faced with people suffering from fatigue.
(The implication being how can they be expected to know - it could be anything - when ME is clearly more than just fatigue - if only they took the trouble to inform themselves)
. That GPs are aware of and use the CCCs to diagnose ME/CFS.
(Most GPs in Australia aren't aware of the CCCs. This was supported by other viewers in their comments. I can't even get them to read hard copies of the International Consensus Primer when I hand it to them. And surely this assertion is at odds with point one above ie they don't know how to distinguish ME from fatigue)
. That GPs aren't taught anything about fatigue in medical school
(The implication being how can they be expected to know about ME? And their professional learning is frozen in time at that point? And at odds with point 2 above ie they are aware of and use the CCCs)
There was also another man at the end who was trying to find specks of gold dust in PACE. David Tuller dealt with this nicely.
Overall, I was impressed with David Tuller's grasp of the problems ME sufferers face, the science and the politics of ME and his ability to argue cogently and convincingly on our behalf.
Hopefully Emerge will post a full version of the session online.
I'd be interested in other people's comments on the session.
Interesting to hear from David Tuller about how he became interested in ME and what keeps him motivated to keep advocating on our behalf.
In Australia, he plans to have meetings with politicians to lobby on our behalf and hopes to engage with mainstream media. He is also gathering material for future articles.
Grateful for his efforts on our behalf.
The Q and A:
I'm not able to put together a summary of the session but here are a few issues regarding questions from the audience:
I found the male doctor's assertions disturbing:
. That GPs are frequently faced with people suffering from fatigue.
(The implication being how can they be expected to know - it could be anything - when ME is clearly more than just fatigue - if only they took the trouble to inform themselves)
. That GPs are aware of and use the CCCs to diagnose ME/CFS.
(Most GPs in Australia aren't aware of the CCCs. This was supported by other viewers in their comments. I can't even get them to read hard copies of the International Consensus Primer when I hand it to them. And surely this assertion is at odds with point one above ie they don't know how to distinguish ME from fatigue)
. That GPs aren't taught anything about fatigue in medical school
(The implication being how can they be expected to know about ME? And their professional learning is frozen in time at that point? And at odds with point 2 above ie they are aware of and use the CCCs)
There was also another man at the end who was trying to find specks of gold dust in PACE. David Tuller dealt with this nicely.
Overall, I was impressed with David Tuller's grasp of the problems ME sufferers face, the science and the politics of ME and his ability to argue cogently and convincingly on our behalf.
Hopefully Emerge will post a full version of the session online.
I'd be interested in other people's comments on the session.
Last edited: