would you mind explaining the effects of the presence of these fragments of recombinant Spike protein in those who had a mRNA vaccine?
I'm no expert, just trying to keep track of publications as they come out; but million dollar question and I don't think anyone knows. To make an effective vaccine we needed to train our immune systems on the spike protein. The assumption based on current understanding was that this occurred in lymph nodes and that mRNA has a short half-life. Both those assumptions seem to be being called into question.
This paper references another that found that mRNA (as opposed to spike protein) was present in the blood out to 28 days in patients whose viral landscape was being monitored (hepatitis C) —
SARS-CoV-2 spike mRNA vaccine sequences circulate in blood up to 28 days after COVID-19 vaccination (2023, APMIS)
There was also the study that showed mRNA in breast milk (although that was up to 45 hours post vaccination) —
Detection of Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Human Breast Milk (2022, JAMA Pediatrics)
If it wasn't planned that they be there, but has been shown to happen by various groups, what is the significance of that? Will there be studies comparing the 50% who have them with the 50% who don't?
I don't know what studies may be planned. It sounds like something that should be evaluated, because it could lead to improvements in technology and thereby safety and efficacy, as well as inform on aspects of immune function. I can imagine that there may not be much appetite to support such research from government funding agencies however, given political and legal implications.
Could these fragments be causing the microclots that are being found? I have also read of substances being found in urine.
We don't know if microclots are a real phenomenon in vivo, vs an artefact of hypercoagulability. There do seem to be multiple papers showing derangement of coagulation pathways, so it might be more likely the latter. However, microthrombi are consistently reported in post-mortem studies, and while by definition that wasn't consistent with ongoing effective physiology, we should leave the door open to the possibility that they are present in LC.
We have had in vivo evidence of abnormal physiology that could be explained by microclots, eg the xenon MRI studies —
Review of Hyperpolarized Pulmonary Functional 129Xe MR for Long-COVID (2023, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging)
I recall one paper that showed in vitro amyloid fibrin formation in the presence of spike protein —
Amyloidogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein (2022, Journal of the American Chemical Society)
And there was the paper that showed spike protein in the middle of clots retrieved by endovascular techniques —
Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein on retrieved thrombi from COVID-19 patients (2022, Journal of Hematology & Oncology)
Your last sentence indicates that the technique they used to detect the vaccine spike in blood can be used on other body parts. Do you know if research on other parts of the body has happened? "Data in preparation" ? Do you know of any studies on the heart for example? - there seemed to be claims of lots of myo-and pericarditis around post vaccination.
Circulating Spike Protein Detected in Post–COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Myocarditis (2023, Circulation)
Not vaccine-specific spike but there are some, including a recent (obese) mouse study that showed spike protein caused cardiomyocyte mitochondrial metabolic reprogramming and resultant fibrosis —
Spike Protein Impairs Mitochondrial Function in Human Cardiomyocytes: Mechanisms Underlying Cardiac Injury in COVID-19 (2023, Cells)
The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induces long-term transcriptional perturbations of mitochondrial metabolic genes, causes cardiac fibrosis, and reduces myocardial contractile in obese mice (2023, Molecular Metabolism)
I'm jumping round a lot maybe drawing links where there aren't any but it will be interesting to see the "data in preparation". Thank you for posting this.
It's a difficult area, intersecting science and politics. To my mind there's a spectrum: with the rabid anti-vaxxers/"vaccines are the sole cause of LC and everything else bad" at one end and the "vaccines can do no wrong and are immune (hah!) from any conceivable adverse effects" at the other. Science/reality is somewhere in the middle of that spectrum. I think people have been surprised to realise that the component the virus uses to enter the cell and that we need to train immunity on — the spike protein — could itself be pathogenic. We have a few papers under the
spike-protein tag.