Exploring the adverse events of Oxford-AstraZeneca, Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Johnson and Jonson COVID-19 vaccination on Guillain–Barré syndrome
Abstract
The vaccination against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is an important public health strategy to prevent people from the pandemic. Vaccines are a game-changing tool, it is essential to understand the adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination.

This study explored the adverse events of COVID-19 Vaccination Oxford–AstraZeneca, Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, Johnson and Johnson on Guillain–Barré Syndrome (GBS). In this study, initially 128 documents were identified from the databases, including Pub-Med, Web of Science-Clarivate Analytics, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The articles on COVID-19 vaccination and GBs were searched using the keywords “SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, Vaccination, and Guillain Barré Syndrome, GBS”, finally, 16 documents were included in the analysis and synthesis.

After administering 1,680,042,214 doses of COVID-19 vaccines, 6177 cases were identified with 10.5 cases per million vaccine doses. A significant positive risk was found between COVID-19 vaccine administration and GBS with a risk rate of RR 1.97 (95% CI 1.26–3.08, p = 0.01). The mRNA vaccines were associated with 2076 cases, and 1,237,638,401 vaccine doses were linked with 4.47 GBS events per million vaccine doses.

The first dose of the m-RNA vaccine was associated with 8.83 events per million doses compared to the second dose with 02 events per million doses. The viral-vector vaccine doses 193,535,249 were linked to 1630 GBS cases with 11.01 cases per million doses. The incidence of GBS after the first dose was 17.43 compared to 1.47 cases per million in the second dose of the viral-vector vaccine.

The adverse events of the Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine were linked to 1339 cases of GBS following 167,786,902 vaccine doses, with 14.2 cases per million doses. The Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine significantly increased the risk of GBS RR: 2.96 (95% CI 2.51–3.48, p = 0.01).

For the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, there were 7.20 cases per million doses of the vaccine, and no significant association was identified between the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and GBS incidence RR: 0.99 (95% CI 0.75–1.32, p = 0.96).

Moderna vaccine was related with 419 cases of GBS after administering 420,420,909 doses, with 2.26 cases per million doses. However, Johnson and Johnson's vaccination was linked to 235 GBS after 60,256,913 doses of the vaccine with 8.80 cases per million doses.

A significant association was seen between the risk of GBS and Ad.26.COV2. S vaccine, RR: 2.47 (95% CI 1.30–4.69, p < 0.01). Overall, a significant association was seen between the COVID-19 vaccines and the risk of GBS. The incidence of GBS was higher after the first dose compared to GBS cases per million in the second dose.

LINK
 
Case reports.

Post-SARS-CoV-2 infection and post-vaccine-related neurological complications share clinical features and the same positivity to anti-ACE2 antibodies
Bellucci, Margherita; Bozzano, Federica Maria; Castellano, Chiara; Pesce, Giampaola; Beronio, Alessandro; Farshchi, Alireza Hajabbas; Limongelli, Alessandro; Uccelli, Antonio; Benedetti, Luana; De Maria, Andrea

A potential overlap in symptoms between post-acute COVID-19 syndrome and post-COVID-19 vaccination syndrome has been noted. We report a paired description of patients presenting with similar manifestations involving the central (CNS) or peripheral nervous system (PNS) following SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination, suggesting that both may have triggered similar immune-mediated neurological disorders in the presence of anti-idiotype antibodies directed against the ACE2 protein.

Four patients exhibited overlapping neurological manifestations following SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination: radiculitis, Guillain–Barre syndrome, and MRI-negative myelitis, respectively, sharing positivity for anti-ACE2 antibodies. Autoantibodies against AQP-4, MOG, GlyR, GAD, and amphiphysin, onconeural antibodies for CNS syndromes, and anti-ganglioside antibodies for PNS syndromes tested negative in all patients.

Anti-idiotype antibodies against ACE2 have been detected in patients who recovered from COVID-19 infection, and it has been hypothesized that such antibodies may mediate adverse events following SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination, resulting in the activation of the immune system against cells expressing ACE2, such as neurons. Our data reveal clinically overlapping syndromes triggered by SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination, sharing positivity for anti-ACE2 antibodies. Their presence, in the absence of other classic autoimmune markers of CNS or PNS involvement, suggests that they might play an active role in the context of an aberrant immune response.

Anti-idiotype antibodies directed against ACE2 may be triggered by both SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination, possibly contributing to neurological autoimmune manifestations. Their pathogenic role, however, remains to be demonstrated in large-scale, more structured studies.


Link | PDF (Frontiers in Immunology) [Open Access]
 
Cohort study of cardiovascular safety of different COVID-19 vaccination doses among 46 millions adults in England, 2024, Samamtha Ip, et al



LINK
I need to avoid reading tooo much today (other essential things I need to use up my quota on) but I have been wondering
how they distinguish adverse effects from the vaccination vs effects from getting an infection?
For example: I know someone who believes they have had long term significant adverse effects from the vaccine, which is possible, but they also were socialising with people who had covid (they didn’t know at the time). Since the effect I’m talking about is, from my reading, associated with covid infection immune response, it is therefore also known to be associated with the vaccine immune response.
They would say that they hadn’t caught covid then. But as I recall they felt ill for a few days and had opportunity for infection. This is all sounding like I’m doubting them and their illness, I’m really not. I’m very conscious that neither of us know for sure, only that it is most likely to be covid related. It’s something I might not have previously thought much about when reading research into adverse effects.

So it makes me wonder how researchers could differentiate such effects? After all, a lot of people would genuinely say they didn’t catch covid in a particular time period but if they didn’t test how would they know?
Perhaps for more immediate effects you would say the odds might favour one answer but if it’s something that developed over weeks (hard to know exactly) and is ongoing and fluctuating … I can’t imagine how one could distinguish for research purposes.

It seems to me that one of the few answers to this is the, now relatively short, period during which some countries managed to keep covid from circulating in the community whilst also rolling out vaccines. But I’m not sure if this was done? Or if there were other ways to do this?

Perhaps it doesn’t matter if you’re going to be inevitably exposed. But I thought it worth understanding better.
 
Exploring the adverse events of Oxford-AstraZeneca, Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Johnson and Jonson COVID-19 vaccination on Guillain–Barré syndrome


LINK
Just noting that this says that various vaccines had some statistically significant association with GBS but that Pfizer did not. It reminds me that generalising across multiple vaccine types can be good to scale up the numbers but it’s worth drilling down too. Reminds me that it’s good there are a range of vaccines developed and studied.
 
I need to avoid reading tooo much today (other essential things I need to use up my quota on) but I have been wondering
how they distinguish adverse effects from the vaccination vs effects from getting an infection

It's not going to be the same for everyone but the symptoms I had from the vaccine were completely different to when I got the virus.

I also tested myself for a Covid infection plus the hospital did it as well.

The vaccine symptoms started as an acute onset on the evening of the vaccine and the day after. They didn't feel like a virus for me at the time but I still tested.

When I got Covid after that the symptoms were completely different to the vaccine. It felt like a virus.

Judging from posts from the vaccine group I belong it's not uncommon to hear of symptoms very distinctly different to a virus. No idea how common that is of course.
 
Last edited:
The systemic capillary leak syndrome following COVID-19 vaccine
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 outbreak has been declared the sixth Public Health Emergency of International Concern certified by the World Health Organization. With the extensive application of COVID-19 vaccines, rare but serious adverse reactions have gradually emerged, among which systemic capillary leak syndrome (SCLS) deserves our attention.

SCLS is difficult to diagnose. Not only can it exacerbate various diseases, but also can lead to pulmonary edema, kidney failure, and even death. We summarized and discussed case reports of SCLS induced by COVID-19 vaccines to raise awareness of COVID-19 vaccine-associated rare diseases.

We conducted a comprehensive search in Web of Science, PubMed and Embase and collected case reports of SCLS induced by COVID-19 vaccine before February 19, 2024. We identified and analyzed 12 articles, encompassing 15 cases. We synthesized the data to summerize possible mechanisms of SCLS, clinical manifestations, differential diagnoses, and therapeutic approaches. Most SCLS occurred after vaccination with the Pfe-Biontech mRNA vaccine (9/15) and following the second vaccination (10/15). Almost all patients experienced hypotension (13/15) and tachycardia (11/15). Most patients received intravenous fluids (9/15) and corticosteroids (9/15). 11 patients were recovered and were discharged, while 4 patients died.

Inflammation and endothelial cell damage may be linked to SCLS and COVID-19 vaccines. These findings highlight the necessity of focusing on serious adverse reactions of COVID-19 vaccines and the urgency to reconsider the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.

LINK
 
Report on two deaths from the AZ vaccine.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2g921rd2lo

Interesting timeline. I tried previously to put together something myself earlier

'Could doctors have been warned earlier'

Plus comments from the Coroner who didn't seem to think that one victims severe headaches warranted an emergency department assessment on the 4th of April although blood clots to the brain had been identified in the UK and Germany had suspended the AZ vaccine in March.
 
Though the United States may be past the peak of its latest COVID-19 surge, federal health officials are eying ways to reduce the spread of the virus over colder months and the holiday season, including a relaunch of free COVID tests by mail.

LINK

A note about vaccine timing. We should note that if you’ve caught COVID within the past few days or weeks you “may” wait three months from a positive test or the start of symptoms, per the CDC, to make sure that your body mounts a robust response to the vaccine. Dr. Amesh Adalja, senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, says that wait should be at least three months. That’s because if you have antibodies to the virus in your system because of a recent infection, the immune response to a vaccine can be weak.

Dr. Amesh Adalja on X:
"In this piece I’m quoted about timing of #COVID19 vaccinations. Wait at least 3 months since one’s last vaccination or infection to get a more optimized immune response to the new vaccine"

LINK
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/czxlpjlgdzjo


Meta boss Mark Zuckerberg says he regrets bowing to what he calls pressure from the Biden administration to "censor" content on Facebook and Instagram during the coronavirus pandemic.

In a letter sent to a US House committee chair, he said some material – including humour and satire – was taken down in 2021 under pressure from senior officials.

The White House has defended its actions, saying it encouraged "responsible actions to protect public health and safety".
 
August 30, 2024

FDA Authorized Updated Novavax COVID-10 Vaccine to Better Protect Against Currently Circulation Variants

Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted emergency use authorization (EUA) for an updated version of the Novavax COVID-19 vaccine that more closely targets currently circulating variants to provide better protection against serious consequences of COVID-19, including hospitalization and death. The updated vaccine is authorized for use in individuals 12 years of age and older. It includes a monovalent (single) component that corresponds to the Omicron variant JN.1 strain of SARS-CoV-2.

LINK
 
I want to get the Novavax vaccine as soon as the updated version is available. I didn't know the FDA had approved it yesterday. That's great news.

The article says it will be shipped in prefilled syringes. That should make it easy for pharmacies to administer it. I don't remember the details, but one pharmacy in Austin stopped carrying the older version of Novavax because of the way it was sent, something about the difficulty of combining partially used vials with new vials to make a single dose. (I may be off base about this, but it was something that made it difficult for the pharmacy.) On its website, this same pharmacy said it will carry the updated version, so I guess its concerns have been addressed.
 
Influence of mRNA C-19 vaccine dosing interval on the risk of myocarditis, 2024

Abstract
Myocarditis is the most salient serious adverse event following messenger RNA-based Covid-19 vaccines. The highest risk is observed after the second dose compared to the first, whereas the level of risk associated with more distant booster doses seems to lie in between. We aimed to assess the relation between dosing interval and the risk of myocarditis, for both the two-dose primary series and the third dose (first booster).

This matched case-control study included 7911 cases of myocarditis aged 12 or more in a period where approximately 130 million vaccine doses were administered. Here we show that longer intervals between each consecutive dose, including booster, may decrease the occurrence of vaccine-associated myocarditis by up to a factor of 4, especially under age 50.

These results suggest that a minimum 6-month interval might be required when scheduling additional booster vaccination.


LINK
 
I got a Novavax vaccine yesterday from the pharmacy chain CVS. I only noticed a few side effects.

My arm hurt for about 15 minutes, and I felt some prickles on my face, which quickly cleared up. Some eye irritation quickly cleared up, too. I felt more fatigue and achiness than usual, but I was back to baseline after a couple of hours.

Lots of people in my area are getting sick, so I'm glad to get this first vaccine done. I will also get the flu and RSV shots, but will stagger them, at my doctor's suggestion. He said, given my health history, that I should wait a month or so after each vaccine before getting the next.
 
I wish Novavax was available in Canada, it would significantly increase vaccination uptake. It's up to the provinces whether to buy and distribute, but they would have to meet the minimum order numbers.
 
I've just booked in my Covid booster, but in the UK we don't usually know which vaccine we're getting till we turn up to the appointment.

Even the pharmacist doesn't know until the supply arrives, they dispense whichever gets delivered to them. I don't think it's usual for them to have more than one type in stock at any one time, so if you're worried about it the only real option is to ask a day or so ahead, and cancel the appointment if necessary.

I've only had a mild reaction to one of them, and as I've had the same brand twice since with no ill-effects, it probably doesn't make much difference.
 
@Kitty is Novavax approved in the U.K?

I'm going over to the walk-in clinic like I did last December. No appointment. It's only a 5 min walk from my place. I'll take whatever they give me.
 
Back
Top Bottom