Compliance, operational and expertise risks in practice management, social care, occupational health intermediation, insurance underwriting, etc vs ME

"Unmanaged post-viral disease risks and rising pandemic exposure - Compliance, operational and expertise risks in practice management, social care, occupational health intermediation, insurance underwriting, claims management and reinsurance (draft)"

https://richardramyar.com/pro-bono-publico/51-me-cfs-medical-education-liability-indemnity.html

"This post is a live draft and will contain errors - any feedback regarding typos or grammatical mistakes will be gratefully received.

I cannot engage in discussion regarding the general nature of the content or how it may apply to individual situations. Unlike my other work, it is not in "journal" format. The references are not structured that way (and are a bit messy for now). The use of 'callout quotes' to emphasis key points is not consistently applied throughout the guide yet. "

 

"I should also add that this approach is already leading to substantial success that will be press released."

 

"It is the foundation of a different approach, which addresses the growing risks to medics themselves, their organisations and their insurance, along with specific mechanisms of concern they must manage versus us."

 

"...I've just been alerted to the fact that the actual list of educational resources fell off, in an editing blooper. It will be readded later this week. "

 

Unmanaged post-viral disease risks and rising pandemic exposure

(Updated with addition of version history)

"Post-viral disease is an undermined field of risk assessment, pricing, budgeting, compliance management, reputation management, liability generation and discrimination. Elevated probability of unlawful clinical judgement and/or administrative decision-making in this field pervades clinical and therapeutic services and related contracting parties. Risks are routinely misjudged and exacerbated. "

"Medico-legal issues, requirements and enforcement factors are discussed. Legal obligations on service providers versus current risk generation are then outlined, along with their impacts on liability, malpractice-risk and indemnification. Risk-mitigation measures are offered throughout and are followed by compliant education resources.

This pre-released draft is specifically not structured for scientific audiences and will receive ongoing updates.

Communication of factual or typographical errata or other suggestions is welcome."

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/pand...alomyelitis-activity-6799785407891427328-OgXJ

Image Credit: Weiss & Paarz Medical Malpractice Attorneys

#LongCovid #covid #MyalgicEncephalomyelitis #MECFS #riskmanagement #medicaleducation #doctors #insuranceindustry #underwriting #claimsmanagement #practicemanagement #generalpractice #physiotherapists #covid19impacts

 

"Initial assumption of ME/CFS eligibility for covid vaccination in the Group 6 cohort is not a function of clinical discretion. To not include ME/CFS patients in Group 6 for covid vaccination is unavoidably unlawful"

 

Summary on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/user/status/1394029113179049984


The relative lack of interest in this topic is counterproductively surreal and disturbing. We have become chronically used to persistent lawbreaking and aggressive insistence on malpractice. Neither medics, associations nor bodies of state define the law. Not your GP, not the RCGP, not the BMA, not NICE, not Cochrane nor the CDC.

The lack of interest continues the community's misdiagnoses of the nature of power and control in our context, playing the game on the wrong terms, terms that are entirely defined by the fallacious malfeasants.

Ignoring this ignores the underlying fundamental factor that defines everyday conversations with medics, the NICE process, the CDC process, Cochrane review, Swedish parliamentary sessions, etc. Literally everything. All those processes exists within the limits of the law and do not define what is lawful. Full stop.

The sooner we realise that, the sooner we have realised the primary truth that is inconvenient to the lawbreakers and their facilitators.

Our response is all too often to persuade or educate, only. This is very appropriate where there is no bad faith, not where there is persistence or insistence. I understand. We tend to stick to the persuasion for a fear of upsetting people or being accused of "activism". But this is a mix of accepting 1) bastardized terms of engagement defined by the "the opposition" and 2) it often veers into beaten wife syndrome, frankly. Our fear is irrelevant to the law.

Our relative lack of interest is disturbing.

 

An appropriate example of dealing with the illiterate on this basis (PG in this case):

"Legally unsustainable, which your peers have zero control over

Science shoots the message when methods violate basic standards / messenger veers into weak sophistry

Reducing the definition of science towards illiteracy to excuse rampant malpractice was never appropriate @rcgp"

https://twitter.com/user/status/1401284751567228930

 

Continued discussion from this onwards: https://www.s4me.info/threads/indep...ed-by-hilda-bastian.13645/page-68#post-349086

 

https://twitter.com/user/status/1405111375760965636

 

2/ (actionable factors for other practices or services anywhere in the world to account for linked within the following):

https://twitter.com/user/status/1394029113179049984